Hi, I don''t have means to replicate this issue nor file a bug about it
so I''d like your opinion about these issues or perhaps make bug report
if necessary.
In scenario where is say three raidz2 groups consisting several disks, two disks
fail in different raidz-groups. You have degraded pool and two degraded raidz2
groups.
Now, one replaces first disk and starts resilvering, it takes day, two days,
three days, counter says 100% resilvered but new data is still written to disk
being replaced, counter SHOULD update if data amount increases in group.
Before that first disk is resilvered, second failed disk in second group is
replaced resulting in BOTH resilver-processes start from beginning making pool
rather unusable due two resilvers and compromising pool for several days to
come.
Replacing disk in other raidz2-group should not interfere with ongoing
resilvering on another disk set.
Yours
Markus Kovero
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20090821/02db2aa0/attachment.html>
