Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev
2016-Aug-19 01:51 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
Dear testers, 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how everything goes.>From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems(bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes. Thanks, Hans
Diana Picus via llvm-dev
2016-Aug-19 16:22 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
Hi, All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries. Regards, Diana On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Dear testers, > > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. > > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. > > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how > everything goes. > > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes. > > Thanks, > Hans > _______________________________________________ > Release-testers mailing list > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev
2016-Aug-20 00:00 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
Thanks! Can you post the sha1's for the files you uploaded? Windows and Mac look good. Uploaded: ca26fbfabb54ac1f70776ab3a5503313ec518f18 clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz 26d616e1355dc0802f90babbd5ea0b72abc0c0bb LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win32.exe 42363aeaff395d442f418d77b542a088b5b0658b LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win64.exe Thanks, Hans On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote:> Hi, > > All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries. > > Regards, > Diana > > On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers > <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Dear testers, >> >> 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. >> >> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new >> comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are >> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. >> >> Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how >> everything goes. >> >> From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems >> (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes. >> >> Thanks, >> Hans >> _______________________________________________ >> Release-testers mailing list >> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
Brian Cain via llvm-dev
2016-Aug-20 00:10 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't build on SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests. At least some of the msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is available on this platform. I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back. Is the minimum required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8? When I tried rc1 on sles11.3 x86_64, msan's getrlimit test fails to build for lack of prlimit(). SLES11.3 has glibc 2.11.3. Is there a minimum required glibc? I think this test implementation previously used getrlimit(), which is present on glibc2.11.3. On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Diana Picus via Release-testers < release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Hi, > > All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries. > > Regards, > Diana > > On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers > <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Dear testers, > > > > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. > > > > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new > > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are > > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. > > > > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how > > everything goes. > > > > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems > > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes. > > > > Thanks, > > Hans > > _______________________________________________ > > Release-testers mailing list > > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers > _______________________________________________ > Release-testers mailing list > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers >-- -Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160819/3f58a153/attachment.html>
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2016-Aug-20 01:46 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
On 19 August 2016 at 02:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.ARM binaries good, uploaded. $ sha1sum 2de75ce9a302df58bbfc0e96583c2ba4f12fc0ce clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz cheers, --renato
Bernhard Rosenkränzer via llvm-dev
2016-Aug-20 09:03 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
Hi, built successfully and passed initial tests on OpenMandriva x86_64, aarch64, i586 and armv7hnl. ttyl bero On 19 August 2016 at 03:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Dear testers, > > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. > > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. > > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how > everything goes. > > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes. > > Thanks, > Hans > _______________________________________________ > Release-testers mailing list > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160820/e265dd8f/attachment.html>
Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev
2016-Aug-20 16:38 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
On 19 Aug 2016, at 03:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. > > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.Compiled everything just fine on FreeBSD 10 now, testing went OK except for the two threadsanitizer failures (hangs) I already reported for rc1. These aren't going to fixed before the release, so I'll ignore them. Uploaded: SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = eb529244055e45d0781b4259e286b5be3b8f044e6d3e65dbf67b597441292ef4 SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 367ce05bea07be6697418518445c8dc5156f6dd288a4e3397ff7f17b2d009abf -Dimitry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160820/70810ddb/attachment-0001.sig>
Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev
2016-Aug-20 21:45 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
Le 19/08/2016 à 03:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers a écrit :> Dear testers, > > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. > > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. > > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how > everything goes. > > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.Seems to work great on Debian. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.9&suite=experimental A bit surprised to see include fixer coming in the second rc but why not. However, still the same issue on armel: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-August/103457.html Sylvestre
Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev
2016-Aug-22 17:54 UTC
[llvm-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote:> Le 19/08/2016 à 03:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers a écrit : >> >> Dear testers, >> >> 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183. >> >> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new >> comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are >> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. >> >> Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how >> everything goes. >> >> From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems >> (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes. > > Seems to work great on Debian. > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.9&suite=experimental > A bit surprised to see include fixer coming in the second rc but why not.It was already being built, tested and in the release notes, but the binary wasn't part of the 'install' target so we just fixed that part.> However, still the same issue on armel: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-August/103457.html:-( Not a 3.9 regression though.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
- [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
- [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged
- [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged
- [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 3 tagged