llvm dev - Aug 2016 - [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged

Dear testers,

3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.

This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.

Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
everything goes.
>From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
(bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.

Thanks,
Hans

Hi,

All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries.

Regards,
Diana

On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
<release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Dear testers,
>
> 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
>
> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
> comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
>
> Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
> everything goes.
>
> From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
> (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
> _______________________________________________
> Release-testers mailing list
> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers

Thanks! Can you post the sha1's for the files you uploaded?

Windows and Mac look good. Uploaded:
ca26fbfabb54ac1f70776ab3a5503313ec518f18
clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz
26d616e1355dc0802f90babbd5ea0b72abc0c0bb  LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win32.exe
42363aeaff395d442f418d77b542a088b5b0658b  LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win64.exe

Thanks,
Hans

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries.
>
> Regards,
> Diana
>
> On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Dear testers,
>>
>> 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
>>
>> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
>> comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
>> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
>>
>> Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
>> everything goes.
>>
>> From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
>> (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hans
>> _______________________________________________
>> Release-testers mailing list
>> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers

When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't build on
SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests.  At least some of the
msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is
available on this platform.

I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back.  Is the
minimum required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8?

When I tried rc1 on sles11.3 x86_64, msan's getrlimit test fails to build
for lack of prlimit(). SLES11.3 has glibc 2.11.3. Is there a minimum
required glibc? I think this test implementation previously used
getrlimit(), which is present on glibc2.11.3.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Diana Picus via Release-testers <
release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries.
>
> Regards,
> Diana
>
> On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Dear testers,
> >
> > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
> >
> > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
> > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
> > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
> >
> > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
> > everything goes.
> >
> > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
> > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hans
> > _______________________________________________
> > Release-testers mailing list
> > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
> _______________________________________________
> Release-testers mailing list
> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>


-- 
-Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160819/3f58a153/attachment.html>

On 19 August 2016 at 02:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
<release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
> comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
ARM binaries good, uploaded.

$ sha1sum
2de75ce9a302df58bbfc0e96583c2ba4f12fc0ce
clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz

cheers,
--renato

Hi,
built successfully and passed initial tests on OpenMandriva x86_64,
aarch64, i586 and armv7hnl.

ttyl
bero

On 19 August 2016 at 03:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <
release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Dear testers,
>
> 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
>
> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
> comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
>
> Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
> everything goes.
>
> From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
> (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
>
> Thanks,
> Hans
> _______________________________________________
> Release-testers mailing list
> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160820/e265dd8f/attachment.html>

On 19 Aug 2016, at 03:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers
at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
> 
> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
> comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
Compiled everything just fine on FreeBSD 10 now, testing went OK except
for the two threadsanitizer failures (hangs) I already reported for rc1.
These aren't going to fixed before the release, so I'll ignore them.

Uploaded:

SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) =
eb529244055e45d0781b4259e286b5be3b8f044e6d3e65dbf67b597441292ef4
SHA256 (clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) =
367ce05bea07be6697418518445c8dc5156f6dd288a4e3397ff7f17b2d009abf

-Dimitry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160820/70810ddb/attachment-0001.sig>

Le 19/08/2016 à 03:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers a écrit
:
> Dear testers,
>
> 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
>
> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
> comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
>
> Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
> everything goes.
>
> From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
> (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
Seems to work great on Debian.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.9&suite=experimental
A bit surprised to see include fixer coming in the second rc but why not.


However, still the same issue on armel:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-August/103457.html

Sylvestre

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org>
wrote:
> Le 19/08/2016 à 03:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers a écrit :
>>
>> Dear testers,
>>
>> 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
>>
>> This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
>> comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
>> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
>>
>> Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
>> everything goes.
>>
>> From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
>> (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
>
> Seems to work great on Debian.
>
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=llvm-toolchain-3.9&suite=experimental
> A bit surprised to see include fixer coming in the second rc but why not.
It was already being built, tested and in the release notes, but the
binary wasn't part of the 'install' target so we just fixed that
part.
> However, still the same issue on armel:
> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-August/103457.html
:-( Not a 3.9 regression though.