search for: warrant

Wednesday next week would be the Xiph monthly meeting. It is there enough going on at the moment (IETF document being submitted soon, the various aspects of metadata) to warrant one? -- imalone

Wednesday next week would be the Xiph monthly meeting. It is there enough going on at the moment (IETF document being submitted soon, the various aspects of metadata) to warrant one? -- imalone

Wednesday next week would be the Xiph monthly meeting. It is there enough going on at the moment (IETF document being submitted soon, the various aspects of metadata) to warrant one? -- imalone

...nical reason, e.g. some deficiency >> introduced by one of the patches, says otherwise. HPA, what do you think? >> > > Step 1 is to commit it on a branch. I've actually been thinking about multifs since at least May and perhaps March. I think its change-set is enough that it warrants a release unto itself. When we're ready for 6.04, release 6.04, merge mutlifs, release 6.10, and probably update gnu-efi and release 6.11. Both of these change enough that they may have large impacts and warrant separation. I think HPA does have the right idea. Make a multifs branch to give...

...s is be what the final release looks like. There are currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how everything goes. >From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes. Thanks, Hans

I haven't been an R lister for a bit, but I hope to enlist someone's help here. I think this is a simple question, so I hope the answer is not much trouble. Can you please respond directly to this email address in addition to the list (if responding to the list is warranted)? I have a histogram and I want to see if the data fit a Poisson distribution. How do I do this? It is preferable if it could be done without having to install any or many packages. I use R Version 1.12 (1622) on OS X Thank-you very much, Tom Isenbarger -- Tom Isenbarger PhD isen@plant...

...tion and we ran into trouble with some of our clients having extraneous spaces at the end of their usernames. The quick fix was to add a space to username_chars. The slightly longer fix was a pretty simple patch to Dovecot. I put the trimming in auth_request_fix_username. I didn't think it warranted a full strfuncs function. If there is a better way to do this I'm all ears. I don't really like patching with my own code, even if I did essentially steal if from the kernel's strstrip(). diff -u dovecot-1.1.rc5/src/auth/auth-request.c dovecot-1.1.rc5-patched/src/auth/auth-reque...

I posted an issue that may warrant a patch some days ago with no response. Is there a more appropriate list to post on? Regards, Stan

...d_column_name]. Check out <http://shanesbrain.net/articles/2006/08/04/acts-as-most-popular-rails-plugin> for sample usage. The plugin is mostly just a group_by in disguise. It is probably overkill if you just need to find the most popular items for one column, and probably doesn''t warrant a plugin. But if you are a newbie, then this plugin will do the heavy lifting for you. Shane Vitarana http://shanesbrain.net

...nd described in one of NIST's documents > -- the security comes from strong crypto building blocks, while still > suitable for embedding in a compiler. > Security comes from careful threat analysis and establishing counter-measures appropriate to the threats, which might or might not warrant crypto. My house would be "more secure" if I put 24x7 armed guards around it, but the threat level doesn't justify the cost. As for using AES-128, I see buzzword value, but no real technical need. (No question that "crypto == good" syndrome comes into play here; it's...

Matt, Thanks for the response. Is there an example in the code somewhere of doing the intrinsic ID method? I don't need to put it a lot of places so I'm not sure it warrants adding a node. Thanks. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 2, 2016, at 09:29, Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > I'm trying to 'lower' an operation that ne...

I just built a CentOS7 system on a Zotac NANO PC. I used a 320GB 2.5" HD I had sitting around and installed with Standard Partitions on XFS. The drive is spinning, nonstop. How can I monitor if there is actually disk i/o to warrant this constant spinning. So noatime for all partitions work with XFS?? I did some browsing and the claim is XFS uses realtime which is better? than noatime? Perhaps it is just occasional writes to messages (at least 1 a minute) that determines to keep on spinning. But it is annoying.

...ill has the x86 opcodes), which makes this a low-risk way to try to obtain a valid vbios image. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76475 Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # v2.6.35+ --- Not sure if the stable CC is warranted... it's technically not a regression. But it's a simple change that enables hardware to work. Patrick/Claas -- please test this out (if you're applying this to a linux tree, you'll have to do it manually, but it should be fairly obvious where this should apply). drm/nouveau_acp...

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > Patch posted for review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15471 Looking at the patch, I think we should do FP only for now as vectors have extra complexities which IMO warrant more discussion. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151212/7a61bdef/attachment.html>

...I saw I Lost my printer share. I am using CUPS v1.1.3 for printing. When I went back to 2.2.7a it reappeared. 2 questions: 1> Why did it do this? I ./configured it --enable-cups- --with-pam_(smb) 2> Is there and advantage of upgrading such a small step? Or are there a big enough issues to warrant this action? TIA Kev

...idiosyncrasies of two distros when one suffices? Just start with a minimal CentOS install on your router/gateway and add only the packages that you know that you need. Any critical omission will evidence itself in short order and can be added then; or the source of the need removed as circumstance warrants. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ont...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 Bug ID: 2276 Summary: AuthorizedKeysCommand: add an option for alternate owner Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd

Hi all, While playing with libFuzzer, it's a little cumbersome to having to copy the buffer just in order to null-terminate it. Is a null-terminated buffer an often-enough usage scenario to warrant a libFuzzer commandline configuration switch to always generate a null-terminated test case? Thanks, Johan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170802/1c9a17e6/attachment.html>

...> currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue. >> >> Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how >> everything goes. >> >> From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems >> (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes. >> >> Thanks, >> Hans >> _______________________________________________ >> Release-testers mailing list >> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers

...d a named metadata node seemed like the correct way to approach this on the LLVM side. I have a review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D54487 which discusses some of the differences in implementation vs. GCC. A change to the set of "special" named metadata nodes seems like something that warrants an llvm-dev post, and I was not sure who specifically would be interested in reviewing the changes. Thanks, Scott