Hello gluster-users: I have installed and configured a 2 brick replication setup and it appears to be a successful install. Writes on 1 brick are replicated on the other. My current dilemma is my client will NOT stay connected. I don't know what information to provide, so I will just give you the install steps I have taken THIS TIME. Recipe for this Ubuntu 12.04/32 host in Vbox: Yes, I realize it's "beta". If using Ubuntu 11.x would be better, I can re-install this Vbox host using that. cd /usr/src apt-get install -y bison flex g++-4.4 make wget http://download.gluster.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/glusterfs-3.2.5.tar.gz tar zxf glusterfs-3.2.5.tar.gz && cd glusterfs-3.2.5 ./configure && make && make install && ldconfig vi /usr/local/etc/glusterfs/glusterfs.vol volume cloud_c9 type protocol/client option transport-type tcp option remote-host xx.xxx.xx.xxx option remote-subvolume brick end-volume mount -t glusterfs xxx.xx.xxx.xxx:cloud_c9 /mnt/cloud_c9 (or mount -t glusterfs xxx.xx.xxx.xxx:cloud_c9 /mnt/cloud_c9 -o log-level=WARNING,log-file=/root/gclient.out) mount shows it but when/if I df -h, it's gone and /root/gclient.out shows http://susepaste.org/97668544 (expires in 6 days). No firewall rules in the way. I can ping each and every host from each and every other host and the client. I added my IP using "gluster volume set cloud_c9 auth.allow xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" successfully fuse init (API version 7.17) is loaded. My Questions are: What should a "./configure --prefix=..." be to get the logs normalized (into /var/log/glusterfs/) and the glusterfs to /etc/glusterfs/?' ./configure --prefix=/something --sysconfdir=/etc/something...? On the bricks, it goes to /var/log/glusterfs...and /etc/glusterfs but that's a CentOS host. IF the paths are just a Debian-derivative "thing" then I'll live with that. I have to get the BOSS connected next week, or else, this project might get sidelined, or delayed, or worse!? (Not really worse) We are a Cloud Hosting Provider of the AppLogic Grid Computing Software and I'd really like to be able to provide some storage using glusterfs and I don't have the luxury of letting the clients "figure out" their connectivity issues. It's not a marketable feature if the client(s) can't connect. IT REALLY SHOULD NOT BE THIS DIFFICULT to get a client connected. And some frequent convos on #gluster indicate that I am not the only person having difficulty with this task. Are bounties allowed to be posted via this list? Because I am seriously about fed up trying to MAKE this work. Thank you all for your time. -- JJ / Habitual on #gluster
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:12:38AM -0500, JJ wrote:> We are a Cloud Hosting Provider of the AppLogic Grid Computing Software > and I'd really like to be able to provide some storage using > glusterfs and I don't have the luxury of letting the clients "figure > out" their connectivity issues.Then maybe it would be a good idea to test on a supported platform first. I'm personally looking forward to 12.04 LTS being released, plus a few months for the inevitable bugs to shake out, but it's definitely in the "experimental" category right now. Note also: all the official builds of glusterfs are 64-bit. From what I've read, 3.2.x *ought* to work on 32-bit: http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2010-August/005175.html but if your VM platform supports 64-bit images, I'd suggest using that instead. FWIW, I had no problem at all getting glusterfs 3.2.x to work on fresh installs of ubuntu 11.10 64-bit server, connected via 10G ethernet. I'm testing on this because (a) the official packages are built for 11.10, and (b) it's probably the nearest I can get to 12.04 whilst still being a widely used and tested platform. http://download.gluster.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/Ubuntu/ I have entries in /etc/hosts for all the nodes, pointing to their IPs on the 10G network (there are separate management interfaces too) If you can get it to work like this first, it may then be easier to find out what's happening with your source builds. Some -dev package missing perhaps? OTOH, if it doesn't work from the official 64-bit packages, then maybe there's some problem with your environment (e.g. DNS, iptables, apparmor/selinux) Regards, Brian.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] Merging custom metadata
- [cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?
- Cannot install samba-3.2.5 on RHEL4 - libkeyutils.so.1 is needed by samba3-cifsmount-3.2.5-37.i386
- Fresh build from source of R-3.2.5 failing "make check" under 64-bit Ubuntu [SOLVED]
- Problems with tdb-database after migration from Debian-Samba-3.2.5-4lenny6 to Samba-3.2.5-4lenny7