On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Wouter de Geus
<benv-xensource.com@junerules.com> wrote:> Hej folks,
>
> I''m messing around with DRBD once again but with a new Xen 4.1.2
installation
> using the XL toolstack instead of the xend daemon.
> However, after getting my DRBD installed and a device operational, trying
to create
> a domU using the drbd block device doesn''t want to work:
>
> xl create -c test.cfg
> Parsing config file test.cfg
> Unknown disk type: drbd
>
> My config has:
> disk = [ ''drbd:test,xvda1,w'' ]
According to misc/xl-disk-configuration.txt for 4.1.x, doing a grep
string for drdb show nothing... ...
For unstable, see
http://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/xl-disk-configuration.txt
which I can see drdb there as below:
=====================================================================<script>:
---------
Description: Specifies the script (deprecated)
Supported values: iscsi: nbd: enbd: drbd:
In xend and old versions of libxl it was necessary to specify the
"script" (see above) with a prefix. For compatibility, these four
prefixes are recognised as specifying the corresponding script. They
are equivalent to "script=<script>".
=====================================================================
According to http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-xen-configure-domu.html,
I think can work by using phy instead of drdb but you will need to
manage DRBD state transitions outside of Xen. The below is what I
read from the drdb site:
=====================================================================Under these
circumstances, you must use the traditional phy: device
syntax and the DRBD device name that is associated with your resource,
not the resource name. That, however, requires that you manage DRBD
state transitions outside Xen, which is a less flexible approach than
that provided by the drbd resource type.
=====================================================================
Thanks.
Kindest regards,
Giam Teck Choon
>
> This used to work great with the Xend daemon.
>
> Is there a solution for this, or should I simply revert to using the xend
daemon again?
>
> Thanks for reading :)
>
> Wouter.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users