Fajar A. Nugraha
2009-Feb-25 03:30 UTC
[Xen-users] Xen 3.3.1 + Windows 2008 x64 + GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13 = corruption?
Hi James, I''m testing GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13 on Windows 2008 x64, and found some interesting results : - The drivers are NOT signed, even though I''ve install certs. Had to use F8 on boot. - both QEMU and Xen block device are active, which usually means corruption is coming. Is this a known issue? http://i44.tinypic.com/2vmypvk.png http://i42.tinypic.com/2mewnia.png Regards, Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
James Harper
2009-Feb-25 06:37 UTC
[Xen-users] RE: Xen 3.3.1 + Windows 2008 x64 + GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13 = corruption?
> > Hi James, > > I''m testing GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13 on Windows 2008 x64, and found some > interesting results : > - The drivers are NOT signed, even though I''ve install certs. Had to > use F8 on boot. > - both QEMU and Xen block device are active, which usually means > corruption is coming. Is this a known issue? > http://i44.tinypic.com/2vmypvk.png > http://i42.tinypic.com/2mewnia.png >Yes, that probably isn''t good news. With a recent version of Xen and phy: or tap:aio, windows seems to pick up that one drive is an ''alternate path'' to the other and ignores one, otherwise things will go bad pretty quickly. I''d need to see the windows debugger output on boot to know what was going on though. James _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Fajar A. Nugraha
2009-Feb-25 07:42 UTC
[Xen-users] Re: Xen 3.3.1 + Windows 2008 x64 + GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13 = corruption?
James Harper wrote:>> - both QEMU and Xen block device are active, which usually means >> corruption is coming. Is this a known issue? >> http://i44.tinypic.com/2vmypvk.png >> http://i42.tinypic.com/2mewnia.png >> >> > > Yes, that probably isn''t good news. With a recent version of Xen and > phy: or tap:aio, windows seems to pick up that one drive is an > ''alternate path'' to the other and ignores one, otherwise things will go > bad pretty quickly. > > I''d need to see the windows debugger output on boot to know what was > going on though. > >And how can I get that? It should involve something like a serial console so that the output can be captured, right? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
James Harper
2009-Feb-25 08:19 UTC
[Xen-users] RE: Xen 3.3.1 + Windows 2008 x64 + GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13 = corruption?
> > > > Yes, that probably isn''t good news. With a recent version of Xen and > > phy: or tap:aio, windows seems to pick up that one drive is an > > ''alternate path'' to the other and ignores one, otherwise things will go > > bad pretty quickly. > > > > I''d need to see the windows debugger output on boot to know what was > > going on though. > > > > > > And how can I get that? It should involve something like a serial > console so that the output can be captured, right?I think I documented it on the wiki. Basically yes, you use a virtual serial port on the DomU and connect the debugger to it. I''m nearing the end of a pretty major set of changes to gplpv, but haven''t tested x64 yet... hopefully I''ll have some good news shortly. James _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users