> An RFC for eg Vorbis is the next logical step after the current drafts > are passed.I'm confused -- isn't audio/vorbis in the present RFC? Or is that application/Ogg? BTW I don't mean to complain, this is great stuff you guys are doing. I'd love to help any way I can.> > Linus > > --- >8 ---- > List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ > Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ > To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to > 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' > containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No > subject is needed. > Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered. >--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
> I'm confused -- isn't audio/vorbis in the present RFC? Or is that application/Ogg?audio/vorbis is tied to RTP transmission. Since there is no multi-codec RTP stream, this is fine. There will be a video/theora for RTP theora. There's no need for video/theora-vorbis, since the RTP protocol duplicates much of the reason for Ogg. TCP streaming I assume will be handled forever the old-school application/ogg way, just as traditional downloads and HTTP are done now. <p>There is a another discussion regarding how to tell between different kinds of ogg files in a directory, since obvously they will all have the .ogg extension. As far as I know, audio/vorbis is defined for streaming RTP only. It will probably be part of the RTP payload I-D, not a separate document. jack. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
ons 2003-01-08 klockan 23.34 skrev Dan Miller:> > An RFC for eg Vorbis is the next logical step after the current drafts > > are passed. > > I'm confused -- isn't audio/vorbis in the present RFC? > Or is that application/Ogg?I was referring to a draft on the vorbis format itself, not any media type. What we're doing now is standardizing how vorbis is to be *transported* over RTP and Ogg streams. The next natural step is then to specify Vorbis as an Internet Standard for lossy digital audio, ie set up an RFC for Vorbis audio. In case someone has the time and effort required to do that. But that is all after we pass current drafts. Linus --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [Fwd: Re: Regarding non-streaming Ogg]
- Re: Ogg Internet Drafts - create application/ogg-vorbis, application/ogg-tarkin, etc.
- Re: Ogg Internet Drafts - create application/ogg-vorbis, application/ogg-tarkin, etc.
- Re: Ogg Internet Drafts - create application/ogg-vorbis, application/ogg-tarkin, etc.
- [Fwd: Re: Regarding non-streaming Ogg]