similar to: List etiquette question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "List etiquette question"

2006 Jul 25
3
Ruby hangman (was Re: List etiquette question)
"Beast" is more appropriate than you know. It''s definately Frankenstein code. (read: it ain''t pretty, but it works - some of the time). Anyway, it entertains my wife; not sure if hardcore programmers will get anything out of it or not. You might find it interesting (or pointless) that in a complete bastardization of rails'' main reason for being it
2006 Apr 01
2
List posting etiquette
Just a tag-on for the thread about list posting etiquette, etc., etc. The following is a link to an excellent (if wordy) how-to-do-it-right instruction manaual replete with links to other treatises on the topic. The entire text of this document is emailed to the mailing list on the 1st of each month. This is the Cadillac of etiquette manuals. http://www.linux-sxs.org/index2.html Enjoy, --
2012 Nov 15
2
How to modify a S4 function (in the package NADA)
I want to get access to the code of an S4 method in order to possibly modify a function to accomplish my particular needs: in my case the function in is cenfit() from the package NADA Now, given my reproducible example: my.ex<-structure(list(TEC = c(0.21, 0.077, 0.06, 0.033, 0.014, 0.0072), LR = c(0L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L)), .Names = c("TEC", "LR"), class =
2003 Nov 20
0
General Email and Mailing List Etiquette
> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > Tilghman Lesher > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:29 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Business discussion again > > [...] > And BTW, remember to trim footers and post your
2019 Sep 16
2
Dovecot 2.3.7.2 lucene segfault and coredump
Hi, I have other information. I analyzed the core dump: (gdb) core 22534 [New LWP 22534] Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/libexec/dovecot/doveadm-server.debug...done. done. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by
2004 Sep 02
3
Etiquette question
What exactly is top posting? I thought that was when someone responds to the very first message instead of the latest one. Jim C. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | I can be reached on the following Instant Messenger services: | |---------------------------------------------------------------| | MSN: j_c_llings@hotmail.com AIM: WyteLi0n ICQ: 123291844 |
2015 Feb 20
1
requireNamespace etiquette
I'm trying to resolve a problem of Namespaces and probably have misunderstood something basic. In my quantreg package the function crq() has as its first argument a formula that typically contains something like this: Surv(y, ...) ~ foo, where Surv is a function from the survival package which quantreg suggests. When this syntax is encountered in ordinary usage Surv is resolved, I believe,
1998 Aug 14
0
list etiquette
Howdy folks: Please (I beg you, please!) don't follow the examples of a couple of recent posters. This is very bad form. If you want to get off the list, please don't send send a message to the list begging other readers to help (they can't). Only you can help stamp out forest fires (or get yourself off this list). At the top of every message from the list is a URL that can
2003 Dec 29
1
Agent setup
Dear Group, I have been successful in setting up the Agents, queues and getting agents to log in. Is there a way that I could configure the system so that the agent is called back. i.e. the agent logs into the system, a call is destined for them and their phone rings. If some one has this setup I would be very interested in hearing from them. Warm Regards and Thanks --------------- Shad
2019 Sep 12
2
Dovecot 2.3.7.2 lucene segfault and coredump
Hi, i have a problem with libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4. I See segfault error to messages log, when dovecot store mail to INBOX. set 12 13:41:21 box02.par-tec.it kernel: doveadm-server[20285]: segfault at 38 ip 00007f575b68fc42 sp 00007ffc0272e750 error 4 in libclucene-core.so.2.3.3.4[7f575b569000+188000] set 12 13:41:22 box02.par-tec.it kernel: doveadm-server[18871]: segfault at 38 ip
2004 Jul 28
4
Cisco 7960 backlight and list etiquette?
Hi I've taken apart a 7960 to fit a backlight to the LCD. Would others on the list be interested in this as a project when I've finished (i.e. should I document and photo all the stages)? Also I can source some 7960's at a very good price but what are the rules about posting this information on the list if others were interested? P
1998 May 27
2
A problem of etiquette
Perhaps, the question is silly. But, I prefer asking it before making a mistake. I have just packed a binary distribution of R for Windows3.1/Win32s. It is equivalent to the previous one for Win95/NT (R-0.61.3 + many of the available packages) and it is compiled with egcs-mingw32 (GPL not a commercial compiler). Now, in preparing the README, I put the following sentence:
2010 Jun 08
0
Email etiquette
Hello, When replying to emails, please remove any lines of the original text you are not replying to, especially if you are bottom-posting, to prevent people from having to scroll through pages and pages of useless quoted text. I would recommend people use inline replying instead of top- or bottom-posting, but as long as your emails look tidy I'll not make an issue of that :)
2004 Apr 13
0
*** List etiquette - digest readers
If you're reading the digest of the Asterisk-users mailing list: * Please always strip the parts of the message you're not replying to - do not resend the whole digest! * Please always change the subject so it reflects your message - Do not send a message with a subject of RE: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #3413 - 14 msgs It does *not* reflect the content of your message
2004 Aug 18
0
List-etiquette * AGAIN *
* Please DO NOT post the same message to two lists. We have divided the lists to be able to stay focused and lesser the burden. You are not raising the chances of getting a reply, you are instead annoying a lot of people. Most of the people on the -dev list are reading all other lists. * Please move all discussions about serviceproviders and other products and services around asterisk to the
2015 Feb 13
1
Thread moderation and list etiquette (Reference - Another Fedora Decision)
On 12/02/15 16:51, Brian Mathis wrote: > Thanks for putting in the effort here. It's never a good situation to have > to moderate, but sometimes it is necessary. > > From my perspective, this kind of thing happens far more often than the > current example, though maybe not with such intensity. This situation A large part of this is that some of the regular people are now
2015 Feb 13
0
Thread moderation and list etiquette (Reference - Another Fedora Decision)
On 12/02/15 18:08, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Brian Mathis > <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote: >> CentOS is unquestionably one of the most used Linux distros >> in the world, and yet the mailing list is relatively quiet. To me this is >> a symptom of a problem, and I feel that it's partially a result of the same >>
2001 Dec 13
1
etiquette question
Hi all, I would like to know what the proper form is regarding feature requests and inquiries about future features that are being worked on or considered with regards to samba. I understand its bad form to scream demands on the maillist ;-0 Gr Richard
2005 Sep 15
3
Mailing List Etiquette
OK guys and gals ... can we please stop all the fighting? When technical questions are asked, they should be answered. I lot of people on this list have something that a lot of newbies need ... experience. So answering a question with "RTFM" or "JFGI" is not going to impart any of your experience ... which is one of the things they need and want. Also ... if someone attacks
2015 Feb 12
0
Thread moderation and list etiquette (Reference - Another Fedora Decision)
Hi Jim, Thanks for putting in the effort here. It's never a good situation to have to moderate, but sometimes it is necessary. >From my perspective, this kind of thing happens far more often than the current example, though maybe not with such intensity. This situation forces me to evaluate if replying to any message on this list is going to be worth the headache of the inevitable noise