similar to: Polycom SoundStation 6000 Dropping Registration

Possibly slightly off topic, has anyone ever had Cisco 79xx Series phones come up with "cannot complete conference" errors when trying to conference two calls together? This message may be private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. Gyron may monitor email traffic data and the content of email for the purposes

Are the phones exposed to the internet (even using NAT)? If so there is a good chance these calls are not coming through your PBX but are coming in direct from someone, usually scammers. Polycom has a config option to disable accepting calls from unknown devices. No idea if Cisco has something similar. From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at

Hi, In my dialplan I have the following line. same => n,Set(CALLERID(name)=Support) I am expecting this to always set the caller id name to 'Support' - however, we are getting calls come in as "Anonymous" with the number as something like "unknown at unknown" We're using Cisco 7945 phones - I possibly wonder if they are displaying this rather than asterisk

We were using G722 - I thought similarly and tried a call with alaw. Same problem occurred, any other ideas? > I'm willing to bet you are forcing the use of G729. 7940 and 7960 phones can > only do a single G729 channel, and if you require G729 for the second leg of a > conference, it will fail. This message may be private and confidential. If you have received this message in

> We run a variety of 5000, 6000, and 7000 series Soundstations running > Asterisk 11.6.0 and the phones are at 4.0.3.7562. We do not see these > registration issues. Would you be willing to send the configuration from asterisk for this? This message may be private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. Gyron may

> Apparently this is a known problem past v8 firmware: > http://kaa.kiev.ua/blog/asterisk-and-cisco-7945g-after-sip-firmware-update- > version-9/ I've done some more playing about and what I've noticed is that even when using TCP SIP on the 8.x Firmware conferencing doesn?t work - making it use UDP fixes this. So has anyone managed to get the 9.x firmware working with UDP?

> Next step is packet capture to see if there is a clue as to the cause of the > failure in the SIP signalling. Right, I see the following when running SIP Debug. Looks to me like the phones are expecting the server to do the conference mixing, which I guess it would do in CallManager? <--- SIP read from TCP:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:50604 ---> REFER sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx SIP/2.0 Via:

I'm willing to bet you are forcing the use of G729. 7940 and 7960 phones can only do a single G729 channel, and if you require G729 for the second leg of a conference, it will fail. On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Jordan Cook - Gyron Networks < jordan.cook at gyron.net> wrote: > Possibly slightly off topic, has anyone ever had Cisco 79xx Series > phones come up with ?cannot

Next step is packet capture to see if there is a clue as to the cause of the failure in the SIP signalling. On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Jordan Cook - Gyron Networks < jordan.cook at gyron.net> wrote: > We were using G722 - I thought similarly and tried a call with alaw. Same > problem occurred, any other ideas? > > > I'm willing to bet you are forcing the use of

To be sure you could setup a soft phone and see if the caller ID name comes in correctly. > On Mar 10, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Jordan Cook - Gyron Networks <jordan.cook at gyron.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > In my dialplan I have the following line. > > same => n,Set(CALLERID(name)=Support) > > I am expecting this to always set the caller id name to ?Support? -

Hello, I am playing around with events in asterisk via asterisk manager - i've noticed it doesnt seem to be emitting events to my connected client. Is there something that I need to do to receive events? Also output from 'manager show events' voip*CLI> manager show events Events: -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- OriginateResponse

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling > Sent: 11 March 2015 17:34 > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Caller ID Names > > Are the phones exposed to the internet (even using NAT)? If so there is

Apparently this is a known problem past v8 firmware: http://kaa.kiev.ua/blog/asterisk-and-cisco-7945g-after-sip-firmware-update-version-9/ On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Jordan Cook - Gyron Networks < jordan.cook at gyron.net> wrote: > > Next step is packet capture to see if there is a clue as to the cause of > the > > failure in the SIP signalling. > > Right, I

asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com wrote on 01/23/2015 10:24:24 AM: > Hello, > > I'm having a problem with a few Polycom SoundStation 6000s. > Everything works fine, but they drop registration to asterisk after > about maybe 30 minutes ? the phone does not re-try to register and > if you try to dial out on the phone it says ?URI Dialing is Disabled? > > Has

Hi folks, I'm trying to set up shared folders via symlinking and have come across a problem. I created a folder for one user, then symlinked it to another. I figured that one thing that is likely to happen at some point is that user 2 is going to decide they don't want to look at that folder any more, and will delete it, so I tried this. Much to my relief, it didn't delete the actual

sorry... typo.... the problematic phone has the 192.168.0.13 the asterisk has 192.168.1.211 when i connect a snom phone on the cable that was in the soundstation 6000 before and configure the phone to use 192.168.0.13 it does register on the asterisk via 5060/UDP... it would be helpful if someone, that has a running soundstation ip 6000 could send the configuration... :-/ regards, yves Am

Hi Mark, yes, you are right... these are different VLANs I configured the other phone to use the same IP (192.168.1.13)... and it worked flawlessly... on the SAME Networkcable in the same plug... so it must have something to do with the polycom phone config... remember... when I use tcp the phone tries to register, but does not even try with udp... thank you, yves Am 21.12.2016 um 13:34

Hi, Has anyone here ever used a Polycom IP 4000 Soundstation SIP Conference Phone with asterisk? If so, how well does it work and how does it sound?

I'm setting up a new Asterisk system on a Dell server and I'm getting "fuzzy" voice between the Polycom IP SoundStation 550 and the Asterisk server. I've checked all of my codec settings and both the Asterisk and the Polycom agree on u-Law encoding. I'm using the latest release of the Asterisk code (1.4.17) and other software. If I call between phones (i.e. two

Anyone successfully using the Polycom SoundStation VTX 1000 with Asterisk? I can't see any mention of it on the wiki page: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Polycom+Phones Thanks, Alvin