similar to: TDM400 - channel out to lunch?

When configuring a TE410P which is only attached to a single E1 together with a TDM400, how should one count the channels for the next Zap interface? Must I put 4 span lines in zapata.conf and define all channels up to 124? thus having the TDM400's start at 125? Or can I comment out the 3 spans I don't use and start at channel 32 for the TDM400? (this would get nasty when adding extra

I recently swapped 2 FXO modules on to what had previously been a 4 FXS version of the TDM400 board. The FXS ports are recognized - the FXO ports don't appear to be recognized (ie modprobe wcfxo and ztcfg both say channel 1 isn't there). Has anyone experienced this problem? All software is current as of this AM. If the old FXS modules are re-installed all works just dandy (other than

Hi, Has anyone ever had any problem with the TE220B card with it showing up as four ports instead of two. I RMA'd the first one with the retailer (Digium tech advice), but I just got another brand new card and it is coming up as four ports again. The card identifier is showing 0420 when I do lspci. Has this happened to anyone and if so is there a fix? Remi

I have a pair of snom 360s at a customer and they were giving me Low Memory errors. The distributor suggested updating the firmware. I did that, to the one just below 4.0 (which wasn't released yet). One of the phones is still giving the Low Memory error every 3-4 days. The other one had a broken display that was just RMA'd, so it' hasn't been up long enough to know if the

On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 12:25 +0200, Mikael Jenkler wrote: > Hi Johannes! > > it seams that you pluggin is doing something wrong with the imap connection > > i get this: > > Aug 21 12:21:54 firestorm dovecot: child 21443 (imap) killed with signal 11 > > both with squirrelmail and mutt mail clients, but only when the pluggin > is enabled in dovecot > iam using

Hi This is a general question.What is the differnece between these ?Why I am asking such a question is i am using will_paginate pluggin..Now it is available as gem..So is there any performance (stability and speed of execution) difference? Thanks in advance Sijo -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because

G'day all, A weird problem has just started happening with my * server, and I've googled myself stupid looking for help. My system is latest CVS, a TDM400P with two FXS modules, two X101Ps, and VoIP connections (SIP, SCCP & IAX2). My wife complained about her extension (analogue, on one of the TDM400 ports) being dead -- no dialtone. I had to shut down *, then unload and reload the

Hi Colin Gutrie: Thanks for your repply about alt-gr problem. And great!!!! I'm also a developer (opengl developer), so I very happy to find a developer list of compiz...I'm working in some ideas for pluggins (for now only in a opengl format without nothing about compiz or xgl), so I very interesting in work with you, is this posible??, please guide me on this...what I have to do to set

Hi, I have two small companies that are going to be sharing a * box. I have 2 TDM400's with 4 fxo ports each. Each company has its own sales person and they would like the sales people to always show their own caller id and have their own lines ring directly to their phones. Company 1 sales person uses the 1 port on the tdm400 and company 2 sales person uses the 2nd port of the tdm400.

Hi, all Did anyone tried TDM400 card on old main board (Intel 440LX chipset -- PII)? The reason I am asking is because TDM400 needs PCI2.2 and main board is PCI2.1 I do not want to upgrade yet. Thanks, Rudolf

Hi all, We have tested both tdm400 and BRI 1 port HFC based with mISDN driver and with both cards we have the same problem... so probably it's due to our misconfiguration, but we couldn't find anything useful on google. With TDM400 we can place and receive calls, but if we receive a call from TDM400 and we reject it from a sip phone , asterisk send the hangup but the line continue to

Hello, I have the following configuration : E100P -> * -> TDM400 -> Modem When I receive FAXes, about 20% of them are corrupted : pages are not always complete. If the fax is complex or with numerous pages, it's usually a mess. Before that, I was using spandsp with success. Unfortunately it's too picky with some broken fax (training failed). Since this failure only occurs with

And if that ain't confusing I don't know what would be. I bought a TDM400 with two modules (FXO, FXS) a couple or so years ago and ended up never using it. Passed it along to a friend who is having some problems with it. (He isn't on this list.) We've both tried searches using Google but haven't been able to find anything that helps. So this is more a question of

I've got an old Dell Optiplex (Pentium-II, 1998 Vintage) which is successfully running an X100P card. I'm hoping to upgrade to a TDM400. Has anybody tried running these cards in old Optiplex machines? I'm not particularly worried about horsepower - more about the motherboard having a PCI bus that's able to power up the card... -Ronan

I have an analogue line connected to an FXO module on a TDM400. I want to use the FXO line only for outgoing calls - incoming calls are answered by other equipment, but even if I don't specify an "s" extension, the FXO module still seizes the line for all incoming calls. Is it possible to configure the FXO module to ignore ring events completely? Wiki resources etc have been no

Hi, I have a FAX machine connected to a TDM400 card FXS port. When I receive a fax call through X100 and transfer it to that extension, the FAX machine display REC, but nothing happen (no fax received). There is something special to be done for this configuration? Thanks, Dan

Hello, I have a TDM400 with 2 FXS modules and 2 FXO modules, as follows: Zap/1 - internal phone Zap/2 - internal modem Zap/3 - exchange Zap/4 - exchange Recently I upgraded zaptel (and kernel modules) from 1.0.9-1.1 to 1.0.9.1 and upgraded asterisk to 1.0.9.dfsg.1-3, which are Debian versions for Debian/sarge of the packages I believe the Debian maintainers created (not in Debian) The above

Has anyone had success with the TDM400 in production? I have multiple boxes where these cards lock up and the only thing that will fix them is to unload *, modprobe -r wctdm, modprobe wctdm, load asterisk. Does not matter if it is a FXS/FXO module. I know this topic has been discussed many times before, but my questions is not "is anyone else having this problem" since I know that

Folks, I recently swapped a TDM400 FXS card that was working perfectly into a new server (running recent CVS), and it's either misbehaving (unlikely), or I've missed something obvious (much more probable). Everything seems to be working, but I can't get any dialtone from it when I plug a phone into any of the 4 ports!! All of the jacks are lit (green lights) but they all seem dead

Hi, I'm running * 1.2.7.1 on Red Hay 9.0 w/ a TDM 400 2 x FXS, 1 x FXO. I'm using a VTech cordless that makes three short beeps when someone another extension is picked up, presumably this lets you know if someone is trying to listen in.. Everything works, except the VTech now makes the three beeps everytime you try to use it, even if another extension is in use. It seems as though the