search for: synches

Hello I have a problem while synching between two NAS boxes with Linux. First NAS: group staff=50 (3.0.3pre1) Second NAS: groups ftp=50, staff=500 (rsync 3.1.1) I synched with -rptgo, without --numeric-ids. The expected result was that the items on the second group would be staff as well even with a different gid. However it looks like the 50 was taken literally and now all staff items are ftp

Is there a way to synch multiple servers at once so when one is changed, samba updates all the other servers at the same time automatically? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/how-to-synch-multiple-servers--tp28019825p28019825.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi All, I bought a USB Bluetooth dongle. However, it's not working for me. Please help, how to debug and get more information as I can not see any error or warning message from system log message. I checked http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/22183/focus=22211, however, also find another page

Hi, It's been a while since I created my smbpasswd file, and therefore it is no longer in synch with my Unix file. I've added and removed users over time, and now I need a way to update the 'smbpasswd' file without losing the encrypted passwords that are already in place (ie. I don't want to just run 'makesmbpasswd.sh' again). So, I've written the

On 2 Apr 2019, at 22.37, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > On 2 Apr 2019, at 17.03, Jan-Pieter Cornet via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We're synching mailboxes, changing format from maildir to mdbox, using doveadm backup/doveadm sync. >> >> When

This is a quick question.....Is there any way to allow W2K users access to a share on a linux machine without having to have synched passwords between samba and W2k...(maybe just leave the password field for samba blank?). A while back we had Novell servers and were constantly worrying about password synchs, is this going to be the case with RedHat as well?

Hi, same here, this doesn't seeem to be fixed with latest pigeonhole and dovecot release. Regards, Marcel Am 03.05.2019 um 08:20 schrieb Piper Andreas via dovecot: > Hello, > > Am 02.04.19 um 21:51 schrieb Timo Sirainen via dovecot: >> On 2 Apr 2019, at 22.37, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org >> <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote:

Funny how a topic will come up that you have never dealt with before, and suddenly it comes up from multiple directions at the same time. I was recently involved in a meeting where TAPI (which I understand only vaguely) was proposed as way to link a custom application to Asterisk for outbound and inbound call processing, much like SugarCRM and probably others are doing. Today I was asked by

This server was running fedora core 2 till 12/2/2005. It had an impressive uptime of 180 days or so. On friday I upgraded to CentOS 4.2. After upgrading to CentOS 4.2 this server has been throwing kernel panics every 10 hours or so. These are some of the error messages I am getting on the console: "CPU 0:Machine check exception :4 Bank 0 : f672100000000833 TSC 112180365ccf ADDR e2c7f7c0

How can i have my centOS-3 system synch to a time server on the internet? -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the

Hi, I am wondering how rsync-3.0.6 react if it encounters ESTALE error while synching? If I remember correctly then the rsync-2.6.0 skipping that file/dir in case of ESTALE error. Jignesh. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

On 2 Apr 2019, at 17.03, Jan-Pieter Cornet via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > We're synching mailboxes, changing format from maildir to mdbox, using doveadm backup/doveadm sync. > > When still running 2.2.36, 'doveadm backup' also synched the sieve scripts, without issues. > > After the upgrade to 2.3.5.1, the sieve sync stopped

Hello, Am 02.04.19 um 21:51 schrieb Timo Sirainen via dovecot: > On 2 Apr 2019, at 22.37, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org > <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >> On 2 Apr 2019, at 17.03, Jan-Pieter Cornet via dovecot >> <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi,

I hope someone can answer this. I saw another post about this but it had no answer. How do you exclude entire dirs??? I have RTFM, RTF FAQ, RTF Mailing List Archives, and still I can't figure it out. ugh. I am using this: rsync -avz -e ssh --exclude=/Stuff /home/user/Data/Docs/ remotePC:/home/user/Data/Docs/ but "Stuff" is always synched. The actual path to "Stuff"

Hi We have come across a situation where we are loosing synch of party 1 & party 2 voice in call recording. Here is the scenario Party 1 initiate a call to Party 2 using AMI commands When both calls are connected, we bridge these 2 calls. Then we start recording of this bridged call using AMI Monitor command. Monitor command is invoked on Party 1 only. Then we put party 2 on hold. We

Hello! We are synching some server data (websites, logfiles, ...) with rsync via ssh and are detecting a weird problem: Certain files and directories, apparently those who are regulary rsynced over the WAN, tend to use far too many blocks, e.g.: stat from file on server: File: `bilder.html' Size: 2009 Blocks: 288 IO Block: 4096 regular file [...] The same file (a fresh

Anyone have any tips for handling postgres constraints when using fixtures to load the database, other than to sort out the proper insertion orders or leaving the constraints out? I''d prefer not to do the former since I''d rather use my app to generate my fixture data (using a dump_fixtures task) and I''d prefer not to do the latter because leaving out constraints till the

Hi list, I intend to run an old pentium 133 as a linux-based fileserver on my home network (I have to use windows for my main machine and laptop!) Im having great diffiuculty synching the data, email, etc on my laptop and desktop, so I thought I might configure samba to act as a DC and use roaming profiles to make sure that my data is always synched. My question is this: is it worth the effort?

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Scott Michel wrote: >> The idea is to review the atomic_ops model, and if it makes sense, just >> reuse it. (e.g., atomic_ops seems to have (basic?) support for Alpha). > > atomic_ops may have interesting ideas on how Chandler might proceed and > implement, but using its code is very unlikely. I think that Torvald's point here is that the

Rsync v: 3.0.1 OS: IRIX 6.5.28f HW Plat: SGI 2400 Disclaimer: I am running rsync 3.0.1. It's difficult and costly for us to get new versions put on our system, so I'm hoping you will all help me out anyways. If the solution is indeed suspected in a later version of rsync, then we will go through the pain to get it installed.