search for: oversights

Hello everyone, The LLVM project has evolved significantly since our first public release in Oct. 2003. Most importantly, we've gained many new users and several active contributors, and we want to encourage and support them and attract more. At the same time, the software itself has undergone some significant changes and improvements, and been ported to new platforms. We expect that

On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > I think it first of all would be nice, if we could supplement this group with > a discussion list on this topic. The reason for this isn't to ad more > bureacracy, but to present public ideas and visions to a broader forum and I > belive in that the more elaboration within a broader forum the better the > ideas will get and the more

Hi OG, I think it first of all would be nice, if we could supplement this group with a discussion list on this topic. The reason for this isn't to ad more bureacracy, but to present public ideas and visions to a broader forum and I belive in that the more elaboration within a broader forum the better the ideas will get and the more people will get committed to start and finish the task.

I see strangeness on Thumb TST (tTST) predicate 'isCompare' It is true for regular ARM, false for Thumb: (gdb) p MI->dump() TSTri %reg16397, 3, pred:14, pred:%reg0, %CPSR<imp-def>; GPR:% reg16397 $24 = void (gdb) p MI->getDesc().isCompare() $25 = true (gdb) p MI->dump() tTST %reg16396, %reg16397, pred:14, pred:%reg0, %CPSR<imp-def>; tGPR:%reg16396,16397

Hi, So, I owe you all an apology. I was totally unaware that the llvm.org server, running at UIUC, was still in operation and hosting an active LNT instance. I was under the assumption the LNT server ran elsewhere. As a result, the ability for the LNT bots to submit run information to the "old" LNT server is now gone. I am very sorry for this oversight. In speaking with Chris

On Sep 14, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Gabor Greif wrote: > I see strangeness on Thumb TST (tTST) predicate 'isCompare' > > It is true for regular ARM, false for Thumb: > > (gdb) p MI->dump() > TSTri %reg16397, 3, pred:14, pred:%reg0, %CPSR<imp-def>; GPR:% > reg16397 > $24 = void > (gdb) p MI->getDesc().isCompare() > $25 = true > > > (gdb)

Hi, Having finally gotten around to installing R-2.9.0, I find that while the docs still say I can invoke the --no-latex option, R CMD INSTALL has decided that I can't. Nor is there any notice of this that I can find in the 2.9 series news. Is this just a trifling oversight that will be repaired? Jim

Probably this job: lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage2-coverage-R/ 💬 from 📱 > On May 31, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Duncan Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > > +Chris Matthews, do you know where the configs are stored for this? > >> On 2019 May 31, at 12:39, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> >> Hey Nico, >> >> I'm

Hi, I''ve just installed 0.22.2 and believe I''ve discovered a bug (or oversight). I have an exec like this: exec { "change-to-local-mirror": command => "sed -i ''s#\(KERNEL_REPO.*=\).*#\1 $mirror#'' ${rulefile}", path => "/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin",

Hey Nico, I'm actually not sure where the configurations for that bot are stored. I suspect Duncan may have a better idea. I'm reasonably certain that the missing +x is just an oversight. -Chris > On May 30, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Vedant or Chris: Ping :) > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Nico Weber

Noticed the patterns for setext style headings are: ^(.+)[ \t]*\n=+[ \t]*\n+ Should be: ^(.+?)[ \t]*\n=+[ \t]*\n+

On 30/01/2014 22:57, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote: >> On 30/01/2014 22:06, Daniel Berlin wrote: >>> Actually, the policy actually says the right thing, you removed a >>> sentence, which says: >>> "Please contact the oversight group for more details." >> >> To be clear, I

> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- > plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not > updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain > about mismatched versions though. "kernel-plus-3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.centos.plus" not ".2.3.". Al McCann There's been a circus in my

On 11/4/2015 4:13 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: > Nobody? Surely somebody knows where Samba 4 logs its DNS queries, or > was this was a huge oversight and the internal DNS doesn't get logged > at all, as appears to be suggested by my utter failure to locate such > logs. > > On 28/10/15 14:28, John Gardeniers wrote: >> We're using the Sernet Samba v4.2.4 with

First off - let me say I am not an administrator.?? I need to know?if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition.? When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size.? it's too small and I can't do yum updates. if it's not easy to actually increase it, is it safe to take a chunk in my root filesystem (like /new.boot or something) and

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:06 PM <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Nico, > > Sorry for the delay, I've been OOO. The llvm-cov bot should produce > reports for llvm-undname starting today. > Thanks! It looks like http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/index.html now has an "llvm-undname" entry, but

We're using the Sernet Samba v4.2.4 with internal DNS and I can't find the DNS logs. Where does the Samba 4 internal DNS log queries? Thanks. regards, John

I am looking for yum-priorities or any info on any changes here for CentOS 5.4. There is also a forum post for this here: <https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=22798&forum=37> Is this missing on purpose? Function merged with another yum package? Or is it just missing as an oversight? -- //Morten //morten at mortent.org

Hi Vedant and Chris, is the config for http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/index.html public somewhere? If so, where? (I looked in zorg but didn't find it.) If not, could you add "llvm-undname" to the list of binaries passed to llvm/utils/prepare-code-coverage-artifact.py so that llvm/lib/Demangle/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp (and friends) show up? (If the config is public,

Looking through the X86 GlobalISEL code for selecting loads and stores, I'm not seeing the creation of the MachineMemOperands I'd expect to see and do see being generated by SelectionDAG.  Is this simply an oversight, or is there some aspect of the new design which pushes us away from MMOs? Various parts of the machine instruction level optimization passes use the existence and