search for: oversight

...more. At the same time, the software itself has undergone some significant changes and improvements, and been ported to new platforms. We expect that both the community and the software will continue evolve significantly over time. We feel that this would be a good time to establish a small oversight group to manage the continued development, distribution, and community-building process for LLVM. Our broad aim is to foster the wider adoption and growth of LLVM, and encourage participation and contributions from both UIUC and non-UIUC users. We do *not* want to create a bureaucracy, and d...

...way to arbitrate disagreements between developers. I feel that #1 is important to continue to attract new developers, particularly those in the commercial sector. #2 is important as LLVM grows, because more people working on a project have more chances for conflict. I hope and expect that the oversight group will end up being extremely low-volume. -Chris > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "Vikram S. Adve" <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> > Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.ed...

...=============================================== ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Vikram S. Adve" <vadve at cs.uiuc.edu> Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: [LLVMdev] Oversight group for LLVM Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:34:37 -0600 Hello everyone, The LLVM project has evolved significantly since our first public release in Oct. 2003. Most importantly, we've gained many new users and several active contributors, and we want to encourage and support them and attract m...

...mp-def>; GPR:% reg16397 $24 = void (gdb) p MI->getDesc().isCompare() $25 = true (gdb) p MI->dump() tTST %reg16396, %reg16397, pred:14, pred:%reg0, %CPSR<imp-def>; tGPR:%reg16396,16397 $22 = void (gdb) p MI->getDesc().isCompare() $23 = false Is this intentional or just an oversight? In latter case how do I fix it? Tablegen input? Thanks and cheers, Gabor

...at the llvm.org server, running at UIUC, was still in operation and hosting an active LNT instance. I was under the assumption the LNT server ran elsewhere. As a result, the ability for the LNT bots to submit run information to the "old" LNT server is now gone. I am very sorry for this oversight. In speaking with Chris Matthews this afternoon he suggested we ask all of you if you would care to redirect your LNT bots to the new LNT instance currently running at https://lnt.llvm.org. In the meantime, I am going to work to get a dump of the "old" LNT database off of the UIUC machi...

...sc().isCompare() > $25 = true > > > (gdb) p MI->dump() > tTST %reg16396, %reg16397, pred:14, pred:%reg0, %CPSR<imp-def>; > tGPR:%reg16396,16397 > $22 = void > (gdb) p MI->getDesc().isCompare() > $23 = false > > > Is this intentional or just an oversight? In latter case how do I fix > it? Tablegen input? Oversight I think, and it needs to be fixed with isCompare around the relevant patterns (ARM mode doesn't see this since isCompare is in the multiclass). -eric

Hi, Having finally gotten around to installing R-2.9.0, I find that while the docs still say I can invoke the --no-latex option, R CMD INSTALL has decided that I can't. Nor is there any notice of this that I can find in the 2.9 series news. Is this just a trifling oversight that will be repaired? Jim

...t 12:39, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote: >> >> Hey Nico, >> >> I'm actually not sure where the configurations for that bot are stored. I suspect Duncan may have a better idea. >> >> I'm reasonably certain that the missing +x is just an oversight. >> >> -Chris >> >>> On May 30, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> Vedant or Chris: Ping :) >>> >>> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> w...

Hi, I''ve just installed 0.22.2 and believe I''ve discovered a bug (or oversight). I have an exec like this: exec { "change-to-local-mirror": command => "sed -i ''s#\(KERNEL_REPO.*=\).*#\1 $mirror#'' ${rulefile}", path => "/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin",...

Hey Nico, I'm actually not sure where the configurations for that bot are stored. I suspect Duncan may have a better idea. I'm reasonably certain that the missing +x is just an oversight. -Chris > On May 30, 2019, at 6:24 PM, Nico Weber via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Vedant or Chris: Ping :) > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 7:56 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org <mailto:thakis at chromium.org>> wrote: > Hi Vedant and Chri...

Noticed the patterns for setext style headings are: ^(.+)[ \t]*\n=+[ \t]*\n+ Should be: ^(.+?)[ \t]*\n=+[ \t]*\n+

...Berlin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote: >> On 30/01/2014 22:06, Daniel Berlin wrote: >>> Actually, the policy actually says the right thing, you removed a >>> sentence, which says: >>> "Please contact the oversight group for more details." >> >> To be clear, I didn't remove this sentence -- it's some way down in the >> paragraph and pertains to receiving details from the oversight group, >> whereas the section about providing notification pertains to "us", the LL...

> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- > plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not > updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain > about mismatched versions though. "kernel-plus-3.10.0-862.3.2.el7.centos.plus" not ".2.3.". Al McCann There's been a circus in my head since the day I was born.

On 11/4/2015 4:13 PM, John Gardeniers wrote: > Nobody? Surely somebody knows where Samba 4 logs its DNS queries, or > was this was a huge oversight and the internal DNS doesn't get logged > at all, as appears to be suggested by my utter failure to locate such > logs. > > On 28/10/15 14:28, John Gardeniers wrote: >> We're using the Sernet Samba v4.2.4 with internal DNS and I can't >> find the DNS logs. Whe...

First off - let me say I am not an administrator.?? I need to know?if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition.? When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size.? it's too small and I can't do yum updates. if it's not easy to actually increase it, is it safe to take a chunk in my root filesystem (like /new.boot or something) and just mount it as /boot from now on so it uses the space or is that not a good idea?? I...

...that run as part of `llvm-check` to the report generation script, and I had assumed llvm-undname was just missing on that list of all binaries. But maybe that's not how that coverage list is computed? > As for +x permissions on llvm/utils/prepare-code-coverage-artifact.py, > it's an oversight that they are missing. I wasn't able to land a > permissions change via the new monorepo (I get: "Committed c3b9398d101 to > svn", but the commit does not appear). Perhaps you'll have better luck? > I couldn't figure out how to do it via git-svn / `git-llvm push` eit...

We're using the Sernet Samba v4.2.4 with internal DNS and I can't find the DNS logs. Where does the Samba 4 internal DNS log queries? Thanks. regards, John

...king for yum-priorities or any info on any changes here for CentOS 5.4. There is also a forum post for this here: <https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=22798&forum=37> Is this missing on purpose? Function merged with another yum package? Or is it just missing as an oversight? -- //Morten //morten at mortent.org

...binaries passed to llvm/utils/prepare-code-coverage-artifact.py so that llvm/lib/Demangle/MicrosoftDemangle.cpp (and friends) show up? (If the config is public, I can send you a patch.) Also, is there a reason llvm/utils/prepare-code-coverage-artifact.py doesn't have +x set, or is that just an oversight? Thanks, Nico -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190529/9c0311e5/attachment.html>

Looking through the X86 GlobalISEL code for selecting loads and stores, I'm not seeing the creation of the MachineMemOperands I'd expect to see and do see being generated by SelectionDAG.  Is this simply an oversight, or is there some aspect of the new design which pushes us away from MMOs? Various parts of the machine instruction level optimization passes use the existence and contents of an MMO for optimization legality checks.  As a simple example, we won't fold a load unless we can examine it's...