search for: nevers

Hi All, I'm relatively new to R. I have a variable, "internet use," which ranges from "Almost everyday, "Several times a week," "Several times a month," "Seldom," "Never," and "Don't know." I want to recode this data into a new variable, say "use.internet," such that I have a dichotomous variable indicating

Hi, I am a Newbie for R. I just installed R-base on my notebook with openSuSE 11. However, I always got compilation errors in installing add-on packages. For example, when installing "igraph" I got the following error: ___________________________________________________________________ * Installing *source* package 'igraph' ... checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler

Consider this data structure (df1) ... Group Year PctProf FullYr 1 Never RF 2004 87 88 2 Cohort 1 2004 83 84 3 Cohort 2 2004 84 86 4 Cohort 3 2004 87 87 5 Cohort 4 2004 73 74 6 Never RF 2005 85 86 7 Cohort 1 2005 81 82 8 Cohort 2 2005 81 81 9 Cohort 3 2005 78 79 10 Cohort 4 2005 72 74 11

Hi all, I am trying to run a two factor anova, but one of the factors is a random factor, now I am also running in SPSS and it seems its dividing by the wrong term to get the appropriate F term. here is my data. In SPSS the F scores about double the ones in R, how can I specify one of my factors as a random factor or change it to where it does the right model fitting? I am using the lm command

flight 12033 xen-4.0-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12033/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 6 leak-check/basis(6) fail REGR. vs. 11853 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 14 guest-localmigrate/x10

flight 13439 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13439/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 9 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 13379 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 9 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 13376 Regressions which are regarded as

flight 12038 xen-4.0-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12038/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 10 guest-saverestore fail blocked in 11853 test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 5 xen-boot fail like 11853 Tests which did not succeed, but are not

flight 14679 xen-4.1-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/14679/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 8 debian-fixup fail like 14675 test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 11 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 14675 Tests which did not succeed, but are not

flight 12228 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12228/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 9 guest-start.2 fail like 12225 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass

flight 12796 xen-4.1-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12796/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12785 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot

flight 12857 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12857/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 11 guest-localmigrate.2 fail pass in 12856 test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 9 guest-start fail in 12856 pass in 12857 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not

flight 5856 xen-4.0-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5856/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 5691 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking, including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable: test-amd64-amd64-win 16

On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:45 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Can't you implement __builtin_assume(cond) to codegen to something >> like: >> >> %cond = i1 ... >> br i1 %cond, label %always, label %never >> never: >> unreachable >> always: > > The code generators will remove the branch to %never. > I already tried this :) What would work is

flight 12230 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12230/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12228 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install

Whoops, email client auto-filled dev previously. Let's try this again. Michael Maier wrote: <snip> > Ok - but this doesn't seem to answer my main question: > > Why must > > progressinband=never > > be applied especially if asterisk uses it by default? The big difference > between w/ and w/o it is: The default in 13 is "no" which still

flight 10644 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10644/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 10 guest-saverestore fail pass in 10643 test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail pass in 10643 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:

flight 10635 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10635/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-i386-i386-win 7 windows-install fail pass in 10632 test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail pass in 10632 test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install

flight 13339 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13339/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 13025 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 9 guest-start

flight 16260 xen-4.2-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/16260/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-i386-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 16228 test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 16228 test-i386-i386-win 5

I have been running experiments and I found an interesting multiple representations of never expiring accounts. I see when I create an account using the ADUC in windows 10 pro on samba-dc-4.7.5-2.fc27 when I use ldapsearch to get accountExpires I get 9223372036854775807 if I set the account to expire I get the expected value for that date. Here is the strange part when I set the account back to