search for: never

Hi All, I'm relatively new to R. I have a variable, "internet use," which ranges from "Almost everyday, "Several times a week," "Several times a month," "Seldom," "Never," and "Don't know." I want to recode this data into a new variable, say "use.internet," such that I have a dichotomous variable indicating simply whether or not they have access to the internet. Hence, I want to make "Never" and "Don't know"...

...rc/Makevars ** libs gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/lib/R/include -I/usr/local/include -DUSING_R -I. -g -O2 -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"0.5\" -DINTERNAL_ARPACK -DINTERNAL_LAPACK -DINTERNAL_BLAS -fpic -g -O2 -c adjlist.c -o adjlist.o igraph.h:435: warning: inline function ?igraph_es_type? declared but never defined igraph.h:233: warning: inline function ?igraph_vs_type? declared but never defined igraph.h:435: warning: inline function ?igraph_es_type? declared but never defined igraph.h:233: warning: inline function ?igraph_vs_type? declared but never defined gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/lib/R/include -I/us...

Consider this data structure (df1) ... Group Year PctProf FullYr 1 Never RF 2004 87 88 2 Cohort 1 2004 83 84 3 Cohort 2 2004 84 86 4 Cohort 3 2004 87 87 5 Cohort 4 2004 73 74 6 Never RF 2005 85 86 7 Cohort 1 2005 81 82 8 Cohort 2 2005 81 81 9 Cohort 3 2005 78 79 10 Cohort 4 2005...

...cores about double the ones in R, how can I specify one of my factors as a random factor or change it to where it does the right model fitting? I am using the lm command instead of glm. I am new to R so this might seem basic. Joe King, M.A. <mailto:jp@joepking.com> jp@joepking.com "Never give in, never give in, never; never; never; never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense" - Winston Churchill "You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." - Wins...

...le (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail blocked in 11853 test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 5 xen-boot fail like 11853 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 8 debian-fixup fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 15 guest-stop fail never pass test-i386-i386-xl 15 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl 15 guest-stop...

...le (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 13 guest-localmigrate.2 fail REGR. vs. 13379 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 9 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 13379 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check...

...le (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 10 guest-saverestore fail blocked in 11853 test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 5 xen-boot fail like 11853 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 8 debian-fixup fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 15 guest-stop fail never pass test-i386-i386-xl 15 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl 15 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl 15 guest-stop...

...le (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 8 debian-fixup fail like 14675 test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 11 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 14675 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-i386-i386-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-i386-i386-xl-qemut-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/che...

...28/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 9 guest-start.2 fail like 12225 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check...

...edhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12785 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail like 12785 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 13 guest-stop...

...rt fail in 12856 pass in 12857 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 9 guest-start.2 fail like 12856 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail never pass test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check...

...t succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 5691 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking, including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable: test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 7 windows-install fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl 15 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 7 redhat-install...

On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:45 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Can't you implement __builtin_assume(cond) to codegen to something >> like: >> >> %cond = i1 ... >> br i1 %cond, label %always, label %never >> never: >> unreachable >> always: > > The code generators will remove the branch to %never. > I already tried this :) What would work is to define > an llvm.abort intrinsic, and do: > > %cond = i1 ... > br i1 %cond, label %always, label %never > never...

...le (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail like 12217 test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail like 12213 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check...

Whoops, email client auto-filled dev previously. Let's try this again. Michael Maier wrote: <snip> > Ok - but this doesn't seem to answer my main question: > > Why must > > progressinband=never > > be applied especially if asterisk uses it by default? The big difference > between w/ and w/o it is: The default in 13 is "no" which still allows early media through. That option has a complicated past. > > w/o the option progrssinband=never just the sip-package...

...ly (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 10 guest-saverestore fail pass in 10643 test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail pass in 10643 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 9 guest-start.2 fail never pass test-i386-i386-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check...

...fail pass in 10632 test-i386-i386-xl-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail pass in 10632 test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail pass in 10632 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 9 guest-start.2 fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check...

...le (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 13025 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail like 13025 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 11 leak-check/check fail never pass test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 11 leak-check/check...

...pass in 16232 test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 16232 pass in 16260 test-i386-i386-xl-qemut-win 3 host-install(3) broken in 16232 pass in 16260 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: build-armhf 4 xen-build fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop...

I have been running experiments and I found an interesting multiple representations of never expiring accounts. I see when I create an account using the ADUC in windows 10 pro on samba-dc-4.7.5-2.fc27 when I use ldapsearch to get accountExpires I get 9223372036854775807 if I set the account to expire I get the expected value for that date. Here is the strange part when I set the account ba...