search for: langille

...smtpd was incorrect. It should be: submission inet n - n - - smtpd By specifying n for chroot, it ensures that DNS lookups can occur. Otherwise, if you are using reject_unknown_recipient_domain the following error will occur: Recipient address rejected: Domain not found Hope that helps. ? Dan Langille http://langille.org/

...r 30 minutes of internet that way. Let me watch a bit more streaming?. I?m convinced that idea is achievable with a little programming. Mind you, most of my power outages exceed 1 hour. Do you already do something similar? Do you have something you?d like to share please? Thank you -- Dan Langille dan at langille.org

...ired to avoid this message: invalid vdev specification use '-f' to override the following errors: mismatched replication level: raidz contains both files and devices I tried to offline one of the sparse files: zpool offline storage /tmp/sparsefile2.img That caused a panic: http://www.langille.org/tmp/zpool-offline-panic.jpg After rebooting, I rm'd both /tmp/sparsefile1.img and /tmp/sparsefile2.img without thinking they were still in the zpool. Now I am unable to destroy the pool. The system panics. I disabled ZFS via /etc/rc.conf, rebooted, recreated the two sparse files, th...

...there is no console. I'm attached to a FreeBSD jail from the host system, directly via the ezjail-admin console command. # w 6:52PM up 18 days, 23:34, 0 users, load averages: 0.96, 0.57, 0.46 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT # Ain't nobody there.. -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/

...x. On the console was this: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata0: resetting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded done After reboot, those messages were found in /var/log/messages. I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RC from Apr 4 10:45:49 EST 2003. Any ideas? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

...it and it didn?t work. But that was about getting the NUT server to synthesize LB to its clients before the actual UPS did. If you?re running NUT as a client on your server, then yes, as others have noted, upssched on your server is probably the way to go. > On Jul 16, 2023, at 9:00 AM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > > Hello, > > I had an idea last week: why shut everything off (in my basement) when the power goes off (and run time goes below X minutes)? > > My idea: shutdown the big stuff first (two servers) leaving th...

...s (ping -c 100). re0: <RealTek 8168/8111B PCIe Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci1 I have seen a thread on current mentioning similar problems: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=862039+0+current/freebsd- current -- Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/ dan@langille.org

...s running a zfs send | zfs receive (both within the same system / zpool). The system ran out of space, a drive went off line, and the system is degraded. This is a raidz2 array running on FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sat Sep 18 23:43:48 EDT 2010. The following logs are also available at http://www.langille.org/tmp/zfs-space.txt <- no line wrapping This is what was running: # time zfs send storage/bacula@transfer | mbuffer | zfs receive storage/compressed/bacula-mbuffer in @ 0.0 kB/s, out @ 0.0 kB/s, 3670 GB total, buffer 100% fullcannot receive new filesystem stream: out of space mbuffer: er...

...But that was about getting the NUT server to synthesize LB to its clients before the actual UPS did. > > If you?re running NUT as a client on your server, then yes, as others have noted, upssched on your server is probably the way to go. > > >> On Jul 16, 2023, at 9:00 AM, Dan Langille via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I had an idea last week: why shut everything off (in my basement) when the power goes off (and run time goes below X minutes)? >> >> My idea: shutdown the big stuff first...

...ot;1234567890123456"; spdadd 10.0.0.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/10.0.0.10-10.0.0.1/require ah/tunnel/10.0.0.10-10.0.0.1/require; spdadd 0.0.0.0/0 10.0.0.0/24 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/10.0.0.1-10.0.0.10/require ah/tunnel/10.0.0.1-10.0.0.10/require; -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ BSDCan - http://www.bsdcan.org/

Why wasn't there a FreeBSD security alert for Kerberos 5? Does FreeBSD use the MIT implementation? I got an email from CERT about this. See the attached message below. -- Daniel Rudy >From - Sat Sep 04 03:22:15 2004 X-UIDL: a8f31551eb03ca144862bddc8ccce266 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Apparently-To: dcrudy@pacbell.net via 206.190.37.79; Fri, 03 Sep 2004

...al: 1980 ups.serial: G091C30079 ups.shutdown: enabled ups.start.auto: yes ups.start.battery: yes ups.start.reboot: yes ups.status: OL ups.test.interval: 604800 ups.test.result: Done and passed ups.timer.shutdown: 0 ups.timer.start: 0 ups.type: offline / line interactive ups.vendorid: 0463 -- Dan Langille dan at langille.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20200911/1520dcad/attachment.html>

Disabling chroot doesn't fix the issue, it just worked around it. Aparently your chroot is not configured correctly, likely using debian based system, and your resolv.conf in the chroot is not updated correctly. Quoting Dan Langille <dan at langille.org>: > I wanted to mention I updated the Postfix and Dovecot SASL wiki > entry yesterday. > > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL > > The entry: > > submission inet n - - - - smtpd > > was incorrect. It should be: > &gt...

...t; > [myups3] > > driver : usbhid-ups > > port = auto > > vendorid = 0463 > > productid = ffff > > desc = "5S" > > bus = 002 > > device = 014 > > pollonly > I have only: [ups02] driver=usbhid-ups port=auto serial = [redacted] -- Dan Langille dan at langille.org : https://langille.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20230309/62290a2f/attachment-0001.htm>

...ltage=116.500000;;;0.000000 battery=100.000000%;;;0.000000;100.000000 load=0.000000%;;;0.000000;100.000000 left=157.466667;;;0.000000 where 10.0.0.18 is the slave I want to check and ups02 is the Eaton connected to bast.example.org On each slave, I have this configuration (see https://github.com/dlangille/nut_config): nut.conf: MODE=netclient ups.conf: # see https://networkupstools.org/docs/man/dummy-ups.html # under repeater mode [ups02] driver = dummy-ups # this is the master port = ups02 at bast.example.org desc = "dummy-ups in repeater mode" upsd.conf: LISTEN 127.0.0.1 LISTEN ::1...

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, at 5:19 PM, Roger Price wrote: > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020, Dan Langille wrote: > > > I wondered how folks monitored slaves. > > A NUT solution is to use a "heartbeat" generated in each slave and monitored in > say the master or elsewhere. I did find this earlier today: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2017-April/0105...

...trampled on by > accident or purpose), but you can get root bash as a login shell while > leaving the real root to its normal shell. This make it sound like you find it very bothersome to login and type 'bash' (or whatever), to give yourself the shell you want. Is that so? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

Hello. I am running Samba version 2.2.5 on Redhat Linux 8.0, kernel version 2.4.18-14. Encrypted passwords = yes; security = user; wins server =169.254.1.2; netbios name = SambaServer. My client is Windows 2000, service pack 3. I am only able to browse my samba shares only if I use the ip address of my samba server. For example on Winddows 2000 I run: NET USE \\169.254.1.1, I can see the

...ocal/etc/ssl/imaps.unixathome.org.crt ssl_key = </usr/local/etc/ssl/imaps.unixathome.org.nopassword.key userdb { args = /var/db/dovecot.users driver = passwd-file } verbose_proctitle = yes verbose_ssl = yes protocol imap { imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail tb-extra-mailbox-sep } -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/

...om nut at nabhas (somewhere) (Mon Sep 14 17:41:44 2020): > > UPS networkups is unavailable > > Broadcast message from nut at nabhas (somewhere) (Mon Sep 14 17:47:14 2020): > > UPS networkups is unavailable At this point, are the processes you saw before still running? — Dan Langille http://langille <http://langille/>.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20200919/ac267d4c/attachment.html>