samba - Dec 2008 - Samba versions require specific Kerberos version?

My SuSE ES 10 SP1 (32bit) and SP2 (64bit) servers have (from the
opensuse repositories) Samba 3.2.4, with the MIT Kerberos provided in
the SLES distribution.  In other words, my Samba is a little "ahead"
of the Kerberos distribution.

Is this a problem?

I ask because the winbindd log on the 64bit machine is loaded with KDC
name resolution failures (the kdc is provided by our campus ADS).
Despite that, Samba seems to be serving files correctly with users
authenticated against ADS.  This behavior on the one machine, and
little odd things on both machines, are items I'd like to at least
understand over the next few weeks.

Thanks, all.

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:12:53PM -0500, Frank Burleigh
wrote:
> My SuSE ES 10 SP1 (32bit) and SP2 (64bit) servers have (from the
> opensuse repositories) Samba 3.2.4, with the MIT Kerberos provided in
> the SLES distribution.  In other words, my Samba is a little
"ahead"
> of the Kerberos distribution.
Samba uses the libraries as available at build time.  Therefore
everything should fit and you don't have to fear being "ahead".
> I ask because the winbindd log on the 64bit machine is loaded with KDC
> name resolution failures (the kdc is provided by our campus ADS).
> Despite that, Samba seems to be serving files correctly with users
> authenticated against ADS.  This behavior on the one machine, and
> little odd things on both machines, are items I'd like to at least
> understand over the next few weeks.
As 3.2.6 is available please also test with this version.  See
http://en.opensuse.org/Samba#openSUSE_Build_Service  3.2.6 is available
from the STABLE repositories.

Lars
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20081214/0c3f4d28/attachment.bin