Paul, Deryck, et al.,
Thanks for all of your help (OP isn't savvy--what was your first clue?
<g>). After sufficient prodding, I went and looked and found the
following
URL, at our very own samba.org, for rpms for Samba v 3.0.14a:
<http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Fedora/RPMS/i386/core/3/>http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/Fedora/RPMS/i386/core/3/
Looks like I'll be uninstalling the source build and installing these
rpms.... I'm also going to go to school on Paul's Option 2 below.
Eric Hines
>From: Paul Gienger <pgienger@ae-solutions.com>
>User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
>
>Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Install/SWAT Access
>
>Deryck Hodge wrote:
>
>>Eric Hines wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Paul,
>>>
>>>Thanks for your response. I got the version from samba.org as a
tar.gz
>>>file, which turned out to be source code. I did install from
source.
>>>Where can I get an rpm package for this version? Alternatively (for
my
>>>longer term benefit), how do I a) get FC3 to look at/use the upgrade
>>>version in the samba team's directory structure, or b) install
the
>>>upgrade version into FC3's directory structure?
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Eric Hines
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Eric,
>>
>>You can specify a different directory structure when using configure.
Run
>>"./configure --help" to see the options.
>>Running "./configure --help | grep dir" produced the
following:
>>
>
>While this is all fine and good, it still doesn't fix the problem I was
>addressing, that being source code installs on a RPM based system can
>cause havoc if you aren't adept at keeping things straight. Not to be
>demeaning to Eric, but the OP here isn't savvy (yet ;) ) on where things
>should be to fix the system when things break, hence the post here.
>
>Eric, to answer your questsons
>a) simple really, build an RPM that has been built to RH/Fedora's
>organization.
>b) see answer a.
>
>To build a rpm to these specs, you have 3 real choices. One of them I
>outlined in my response, which is to run the makerpms.sh script, which I
>think you need to add u+x permissions to before it will run.
>Option 2 is to grab a src.rpm and build that way. This is a long
>description, but it's pretty easy. If you download
>http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/RedHat/SRPMS/samba-3.0.14a-1.src.rpm
>and install that, you will get the sources installed in a way that you can
>build from them in RHs directory structure. To build the rpm files, you
>go to /usr/src/redhat/SPECS and execute 'rpmbuild -bb samba.spec'
which
>will then go nuts building, provided you have any dependancies installed,
>it will complain if you don't. If it does complain, install any
packages
>it is asking for. Once it exits (hopefully with a 0 result) you will have
>packages built in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386 (assuming that you're
running
>an x86-32 arch). Install all the samba packages without the -debug in
>the name. I'm sure there's an option to disable debug builds, but I
don't
>know it off hand.
>
>- note that you have to have a few deve packages installed to just get
>started here, like rpmbuild (I think, it used to be named that) and maybe
>some other stuff. Try to run rpmbuild bare and see if it runs, if not
>start to install that and put in whatever it asks for. If you aren't
sure
>how to do that, go to your install disk's rpm directory and run rpm -ivh
><package_file_name>.rpm. I realize now that you may not be that
fluent
>at installing rpm files, that command right there is one you could end up
>using a lot in this step. You can install several packages at once by
>just adding more filenames at the end.
>
>Option 3 is to find a binary packaged RPM file someplace. You're on
your
>own there, I usually do step 2 if things aren't available in my yum
paths.
>
>Hope that helps.
>
>--
>Paul Gienger Office: 701-281-1884
>Applied Engineering Inc.
>Systems Architect Fax: 701-281-1322
>URL: www.ae-solutions.com mailto: pgienger@ae-solutions.com
>
>
If you are unwilling to defend your right to your own life, then you are
like a mouse trying to argue with owls. You think their ways are wrong.
They think you are dinner.
--Anonymous
