samba - Mar 2005 - RE: Samba 3.0.11 won't compile on Solaris 8

> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Celeste Suliin Burris wrote:
> 
> > Samba 3.0.11 won't compile on my Solaris 8 machine. It keeps
getting
> > compile errors in clitar [snip]
I'm having this same problem.
> Wonder why it is failing with #ifdef HAVE_REGEX_H ?  That 
> macro is not defined anywhere.  We don't even test for 
> regex.h anyways.  Can you check 
> and see where HAVE_REGEX_H is defined.
It turns out it is defined in gssapi.h from an MIT krb5 1.4 install.

Given that you are surprised that this macro is defined, is it safe to
assume that the code it surrounds is not supposed to be used?  Can this
code be safely removed from clitar.c?

Thank you,
Garrick James
Washington Mutual UNIX Platform Services

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

James, Garrick wrote:

|> Wonder why it is failing with #ifdef HAVE_REGEX_H ?  That
|> macro is not defined anywhere.  We don't even test for
|> regex.h anyways.  Can you check
|> and see where HAVE_REGEX_H is defined.
|
| It turns out it is defined in gssapi.h from an MIT krb5 1.4 install.
|
| Given that you are surprised that this macro is defined, is it safe to
| assume that the code it surrounds is not supposed to be used?  Can this
| code be safely removed from clitar.c?

Yup.  See http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post3.0.11/clitar.patch
Fixed in >= 3.0.12pre1






cheers, jerry
====================================================================Alleviating
the pain of Windows(tm)      ------- http://www.samba.org
GnuPG Key                ----- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc
"I never saved anything for the swim back."     Ethan Hawk in Gattaca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCNugOIR7qMdg1EfYRApl4AKCvQPHC90jLwXo2jQ3E5r2BeoPu1wCcC97E
FHkUjmVUmD9mGG1qJylo1mo=uxHr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----