Mike Lee
2004-Nov-30 02:58 UTC
[Samba] Viewing ACL permissions via windows kills smbd (help)
Hello all, I have a Fedora 2 server running as a file server. Security = DOMAIN and using winbindd successfully (so I think). Also the shared partitions are formated using XFS so acls should be good to go. However, whenever I use a windows machine and try to view the ACL permissions on a file/folder, the windows dialog box say "Unable to display security information". Then I look at the smbd log file for that windows machine, and it says the following: [2004/11/29 21:44:52, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) ==============================================================[2004/11/29 21:44:52, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 3727 (3.0.9) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection [2004/11/29 21:44:52, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) ==============================================================[2004/11/29 21:44:52, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1403) PANIC: internal error [2004/11/29 21:44:52, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1411) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic2+0x111) [0x81d8541] #1 /usr/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x1a) [0x81d842a] #2 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x81c5f58] #3 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 [0xc06f48] #4 /usr/sbin/smbd(get_nt_acl+0xba9) [0x80cf089] #5 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x809bad4] #6 /usr/sbin/smbd(reply_nttrans+0x9df) [0x809e00f] #7 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x80d1a76] #8 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x80d1d00] #9 /usr/sbin/smbd(process_smb+0x8c) [0x80d1f0c] #10 /usr/sbin/smbd(smbd_process+0x168) [0x80d2c48] #11 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x4ea) [0x824c5da] #12 /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe4) [0xbf4ad4] #13 /usr/sbin/smbd [0x80788e1] Below is my smb.conf file [global] workgroup = MWTP server string = File Server security = DOMAIN password server = 192.168.1.7 username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 preferred master = No local master = No domain master = No enhanced browsing = No dns proxy = No wins server = 192.168.1.7 ldap ssl = no idmap uid = 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000 template homedir = /home/%U template shell = /bin/bash admin users = MWTP\mlee, jsimon, administrator, mwtp\administrator map acl inherit = Yes Below is my /etc/fstab file: LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1 LABEL=/boot /boot ext3 defaults 1 2 none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 LABEL=/home /home xfs defaults 1 2 none /proc proc defaults 0 0 none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0 /dev/sda3 swap swap defaults 0 0 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom udf,iso9660 noauto,owner,kudzu,ro 0 0 /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto noauto,owner,kudzu 0 0 /dev/sdb1 /mnt/usb-backup xfs defaults 1 2 I suspect the error messages are why I can't view the ACLs. However, a couple of days prior, everything worked fine. I am so close to moving my entire office to a ldap+samba backend, but I would like to get things like these worked out first. Any thoughts? Thanks so much in advance. Mike Lee-- Director - The NewMedia Group mlee@mtech.edu
Jeremy Allison
2004-Nov-30 04:59 UTC
[Samba] Viewing ACL permissions via windows kills smbd (help)
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 07:56:58PM -0700, Mike Lee wrote:> Hello all, > > I have a Fedora 2 server running as a file server. Security = DOMAIN and > using winbindd successfully (so I think). Also the shared partitions are > formated using XFS so acls should be good to go. However, whenever I use a > windows machine and try to view the ACL permissions on a file/folder, the > windows dialog box say "Unable to display security information". Then I look > at the smbd log file for that windows machine, and it says the following:Can you compile with -g and get a full stack backtrace ? Thanks, Jeremy.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Temp fix for users getting smb_trans2: invalid data in messages log file
- Using discrete choice data to estimate marginal willingness to pay (MWTP)
- Garbage collection kills my logger and results jobs too
- Use of "&" kills rails -- redux
- Network Servers window kills all Nautilus windows in CentOS 5.1?