samba - Sep 2004 - oplock_break failed

hello
i have "oplock_break failed " in logs, see below. should i consider
removing
oplocks ?
regards

---------------
[2004/09/09 11:08:53, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705)
  ul_55 (129.199.59.202) connect to service users initially as user
DOM_BIBLIO+Daniele (uid=10029, gid=10000) (pid 19058)
[2004/09/09 11:09:23, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(807)
  oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
  oplock_break failed for file Daniele/ExportLecteursRetroliste.txt (dev 80c,
inode = 1569809, file_id = 2).
[2004/09/09 11:09:23, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(879)
  oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file
Daniele/ExportLecteursRetroliste.txt
[2004/09/09 11:09:40, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
  ==============================================================[2004/09/09
11:09:40, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
  INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 19058 (3.0.2a-Debian)
  Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection
[2004/09/09 11:09:40, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
  ==============================================================[2004/09/09
11:09:40, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1390)
  smb_panic(): calling panic action [/usr/share/samba/panic-action 19058]
gdb: Symbol `emacs_ctlx_keymap' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
[2004/09/09 11:09:40, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1398)
  smb_panic(): action returned status 0
-----------------------
[2004/09/09 11:44:41, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705)
  ul_55 (129.199.59.202) connect to service users initially as user
DOM_BIBLIO+Daniele (uid=10029, gid=10000) (pid 23457)
[2004/09/09 11:56:19, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(807)
  oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
  oplock_break failed for file Daniele/~WRD1872.tmp (dev = 80c, inode 1569860,
file_id = 293).
[2004/09/09 11:56:19, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(879)
  oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Daniele/~WRD1872.tmp
[2004/09/09 11:57:08, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(887)
  ul_55 (129.199.59.202) closed connection to service users
[2004/09/09 11:57:08, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(705)
  ul_55 (129.199.59.202) connect to service users initially as user
DOM_BIBLIO+Daniele (uid=10029, gid=10000) (pid 24191)
[2004/09/09 11:57:27, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)
  ==============================================================[2004/09/09
11:57:27, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
  INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 24191 (3.0.2a-Debian)
  Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection
[2004/09/09 11:57:27, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
  ==============================================================[2004/09/09
11:57:27, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1390)
  smb_panic(): calling panic action [/usr/share/samba/panic-action 24191]
gdb: Symbol `emacs_ctlx_keymap' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
[2004/09/09 11:57:27, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1398)
:


-- 
_____________________________________

Eric LE HENAFF
Informaticien auprès des bibliothèques de l'ENS
Centre de Ressources Informatiques
Ecole Normale Supérieure
Paris

On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 12:08:37PM +0200, ?ric le h?naff
wrote:
> hello
> i have "oplock_break failed " in logs, see below. should i
consider removing
> oplocks ?
You could try that, although oplock break failed
messages are often due to local network problems.
Check your switches/hubs/nic cards.

Jeremy.

is the panic action generated by the oplock problem ?


"Jeremy Allison" <jra@samba.org> a écrit dans le message de
news:20040909102012.GF3082@localhost.localdomain...
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 12:08:37PM +0200, ?ric le h?naff
wrote:
> hello
> i have "oplock_break failed " in logs, see below. should i
consider
removing
> oplocks ?
You could try that, although oplock break failed
messages are often due to local network problems.
Check your switches/hubs/nic cards.

Jeremy.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Hi,

i posted the same problem 3 weeks ago, I was afraid, I am the only one having 
this problem.
I am glad, that there others thinking about that problem too, so maybe we will 
get it fixed.
One try was also to switch off the oplocks, which is not a really good idea, 
because several users can work on the same file without noticing it. So they 
will override each others changes.

In those (for me helpless) last three weeks the users complaining about 
problems to save their files grew more and more, they are only w2k - Clients, 
I have a lot of w98 clients still, never heard a word from them, it is not 
only excel causing the trouble, but also word, once I got even with notepad 
and a text file with only the word "test" as content.

Meanwhile I did try to undo all the changes I have made before the problem 
occured.
What I can't easyly undo is the update on the w2k clients, I was pondering 
changing the linux kernel-update this weekend ( from 2.4.21 back to 2.4.18 I 
had before the problem existed). I don't like that, and I am glad about the 
sugesstion checking the switches and NIC's - I never spend a thougth on them
- I think the servers NIC, the switch is a 3COM 4400, but I already had one 
damaged of them to, so maybe 3Com isn't that quality assurance I hoped it to
be.





Am Donnerstag, 9. September 2004 12:20 schrieb Jeremy
Allison:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 12:08:37PM +0200, ?ric le h?naff wrote:
> > hello
> > i have "oplock_break failed " in logs, see below. should i
consider
> > removing oplocks ?
>
> You could try that, although oplock break failed
> messages are often due to local network problems.
> Check your switches/hubs/nic cards.
>
> Jeremy.
-- 


mit freundlichen Gr??en

Martin Schmidt

Tel: 09843/988095
Fax: 09843/988096
email: martin.schmidt@jielo.de