samba - Sep 2004 - RH7.3 compatibility with SRPMS

I just rebuilt the Redhat SRPMS using 7.3 - I am noticed in the SPEC
file some RH8/9 specific shell scripts.  So far it seems to be working
fine - just wondering if there is any conflicts with this..thanks in
advance.



# Don't depend on Net::LDAP
# one filter for RH 8 and one for 9
Source998: filter-requires-samba_rh8.sh
Source999: filter-requires-samba_rh9.sh

# Working around perl dependency problem from docs
# Only > RH 8.0 seems to care here

echo "rpm_version == %{rpm_version}"
if [ "%{rpm_version}" == "42" ]; then
   %define __perl_requires %{SOURCE999}
   echo "%{__perl_requires}"
elif [ "%{rpm_version}" == "41" ]; then
   %define __find_requires %{SOURCE998}
   echo "%{__find_requires}"
fi

On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:10, Chris McKeever wrote:
> I just rebuilt the Redhat SRPMS using 7.3 - I am noticed in the SPEC
> file some RH8/9 specific shell scripts.  So far it seems to be working
> fine - just wondering if there is any conflicts with this..thanks in
> advance.
RH 7.3 is getting quite old now, and I doubt it's being tested.  In any
case, these scripts are not required if the rebuild works, they just
remove Net::LDAP from the 'requires' statement of the binary RPM.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                 abartlet@samba.org
Authentication Developer, Samba Team            http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   abartlet@hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040905/47fb76f3/attachment.bin