samba - Nov 2002 - Does the newest version support Mulitibyte NETBIOS name?

Dear Sir,

I remember that I can use multibyte NETBIOS name (just as Traditional Chinese)
in Microsoft Windows to talk with the previous version of samba (maybe 2.0.7).

But since I use 2.2.3a (which is included in RedHat 7.3), the log file name is
incorrect when the client use multibyte NETBIOS name.  And when I use the newest
version (2.2.6), if the client use multibyte NETBIOS name, then the client can
not share anything with the SAMBA server.   At the same time, I can use
multibyte NETBIOS name in any Microsoft Windows production,  and share any file
or printer service to each other.

Does the newest version support multibyte NETBIOS name?  If not, will be support
at next version?

Thanks a lot!

Fei, Long-Wen
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 07:29:18PM +0800, Fei, Long-Wen
wrote:
> Dear Sir,
> 
> I remember that I can use multibyte NETBIOS name (just as Traditional
Chinese) in Microsoft Windows to talk with the previous version of samba (maybe
2.0.7).
> 
> But since I use 2.2.3a (which is included in RedHat 7.3), the log file name
is incorrect when the client use multibyte NETBIOS name.  And when I use the
newest version (2.2.6), if the client use multibyte NETBIOS name, then the
client can not share anything with the SAMBA server.   At the same time, I can
use multibyte NETBIOS name in any Microsoft Windows production,  and share any
file or printer service to each other.
> 
> Does the newest version support multibyte NETBIOS name?  If not, will be
support at next version?
It looks like the multibyte NetBIOS naming support was broken in
the 2.2.x releases. As we're aiming to release Samba 3.0 as soon
as possible we probably won't be doing a patch for this immediately.

However, the APPLIANCE_HEAD cvs branch does has this fix included,
and I'm committed to testing and making sure this is fixed in
the Samba 3.0 release (CVS branch SAMBA_3_0).

Jeremy.