Hi, Im using 2.2.x at the moment and I'm wondering should I move to 3.0 now. I need samba to be a file server in couple networks. What I need in all of them is to get the samba to authenticate user / group from winNT/Win2k servers. At the moment this doesn't work with the 2.2.x because my lack of knowledge. I have 3 weeks time to get this working =). If I can't make this I must install Microsoft software in those tree new file servers :( and that I don't want. All the tree networks are a like. So is the Samba 3.0 stable enough to be used in a companys use wich needs stablenes? Is the 3.0 easyer to conf to be in a WinNT domain? Thanks Mikko
Mikko Rautiainen wrote:> > Hi, > > Im using 2.2.x at the moment and I'm wondering should I move to 3.0 now.I don't think anybody would recommend you using it in production.> I need samba to be a file server in couple networks. What I need in all > of them is to get the samba to authenticate user / group from > winNT/Win2k servers. At the moment this doesn't work with the 2.2.x > because my lack of knowledge.If you can get your Samba PDC connected to both it should not be a problem. Or you are asking about different domains ? Then you need 2 Samba instances running on different IPs.> I have 3 weeks time to get this working =). If I can't make this I must > install Microsoft software in those tree new file servers :( and that I > don't want. > All the tree networks are a like. > > So is the Samba 3.0 stable enough to be used in a companys use wich > needs stablenes? > Is the 3.0 easyer to conf to be in a WinNT domain?What makes you think that Samba 3.0 would solve your particular problem ? :)> > Thanks > Mikko > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba