I have a project due at school and have chosen Samba servers to research. I am trying to find a source of information that discusses the corporate advantage to Samba. How much money can a company save in NT server licensing fees for example. Something that would help me write a fictitious business proposal. If anyone can quick point me in a direction here I would appreciate it.
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Joe E. Fieck wrote:> I have a project due at school and have chosen Samba servers to research. > I am trying to find a source of information that discusses the corporate > advantage to Samba. How much money can a company save in NT server > licensing fees for example. Something that would help me write a fictitious > business proposal. If anyone can quick point me in a direction here I would > appreciate it.Joe, Suggest you contact a local PC reseller and ask for the price of MS Windows 2000 Advanced Server and the price of Windows 2000 Server Client Access Licenses (CALs). Assume you find that MS Windows 2000 Advanced Server will cost you $1000. Assume that MS Windows 2000 Server CALs (Client Access Licenses) will cost you $40 per PC. If you have a multi PC network, you would spend: No. of Servers X $1000 = Server license costs No. of PCs x $40 = Client Access Licensing costs Now, find out what will be the cost of Software Assurance and add that to the mix above. The result is what you pay for MS Windows at the back end. Now add to that the cost of IT staff to manage the server installation. To compare the cost of Samba: No. of Servers X cost of (Linux _or_ FreeBSD) = Server OS costs No. of PCs x Nothing for CALs = Nothing Add cost of staffing to keep systems alive, bingo - you are home! But what value are you going to place on: 1. Higher and more reliable uptime? 2. Ability to change code to do what you want? 3. Better ability to configure the servers - ie: Samba does great server consolidation - ie: Samba allows multiple personalities per server 4. Total control of feature creep. ie: With Samba you upgrade only if you want to. There are still servers running samba-1.9.15p8 (Dates to around NT3.5) 5. Samba gives you more performance out of your hardware - lower hardware costs Maybe some other budding list member can give you more factors to consider. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: jht@samba.org
You may also want to throw in that the average salary for a UNIX/Linux admin is A LOT MORE than the MSCE admin. ;) -----Original Message----- From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of John H Terpstra Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 7:09 PM To: Joe E. Fieck Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba proposal document. On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Joe E. Fieck wrote:> I have a project due at school and have chosen Samba servers toresearch.> I am trying to find a source of information that discusses thecorporate> advantage to Samba. How much money can a company save in NT server > licensing fees for example. Something that would help me write afictitious> business proposal. If anyone can quick point me in a direction here Iwould> appreciate it.Joe, Suggest you contact a local PC reseller and ask for the price of MS Windows 2000 Advanced Server and the price of Windows 2000 Server Client Access Licenses (CALs). Assume you find that MS Windows 2000 Advanced Server will cost you $1000. Assume that MS Windows 2000 Server CALs (Client Access Licenses) will cost you $40 per PC. If you have a multi PC network, you would spend: No. of Servers X $1000 = Server license costs No. of PCs x $40 = Client Access Licensing costs Now, find out what will be the cost of Software Assurance and add that to the mix above. The result is what you pay for MS Windows at the back end. Now add to that the cost of IT staff to manage the server installation. To compare the cost of Samba: No. of Servers X cost of (Linux _or_ FreeBSD) = Server OS costs No. of PCs x Nothing for CALs = Nothing Add cost of staffing to keep systems alive, bingo - you are home! But what value are you going to place on: 1. Higher and more reliable uptime? 2. Ability to change code to do what you want? 3. Better ability to configure the servers - ie: Samba does great server consolidation - ie: Samba allows multiple personalities per server 4. Total control of feature creep. ie: With Samba you upgrade only if you want to. There are still servers running samba-1.9.15p8 (Dates to around NT3.5) 5. Samba gives you more performance out of your hardware - lower hardware costs Maybe some other budding list member can give you more factors to consider. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: jht@samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> Message: 19 > From: "Irving Carrion" <icarrion@allinterior.com> > To: "'John H Terpstra'" <jht@samba.org>, > "'Joe E. Fieck'" <JEFieck@bluepumpkin.com> > Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org> > Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba proposal document. > Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:42:38 -0400 > Organization: All Interior Supply > > You may also want to throw in that the average salary for a UNIX/Linux > admin is A LOT MORE than the MSCE admin. ;)Maybe per hour, but not per server, since the average number of servers/admin is usually much higher for a unix/linux admin ... Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
Maybe Matching Threads
- Diverse servers
- Umlaute and Sharing with both SAMBA and Helios Ethershare.
- What is the universal (world wide) understanding behind degaussing harddisks?
- What is the universal (world wide) understanding behind degaussing harddisks?
- Samba4, MS CAL and Windows Server as domain member