Hi all, again. I am trying to set up samba with acl-support on a debian woody (final) box. The kernel has got XFS-support and getfacl and setfacl are working fine since I have built the acl-debian packages from SGI's acl-sources. Also attr-dev, acl-dev and the appropriate kernel-headers are installed. The acl.h can be found in /usr/include/sys/. But all my efforts trying to implement xfs are honored by samba with the well known configure messages: checking for _acl... no checking for __acl... no checking for _facl... no checking for __facl... no [..] checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no I did ldconfig after installing attr-dev and removed config.cache, nothing helped! so, what is wrong here? what am I missing? thx in advance, tony.n ______________________________________________________________________________ Die clevere Geldreserve: der DiBa-Privatkredit. Funktioniert wie ein Dispo, ist aber viel g?nstiger! Alle Infos: http://diba.web.de/?mc=021104
On Wednesday 14 August 2002 12:21, Antonio Nikolic wrote:> checking for _acl... no > checking for __acl... no > checking for _facl... no > checking for __facl... no > [..] > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... > no checking for ACL support... noThis is exactly the same problem Stephan Pfeiffer mentioned here yesterday. Seems like a bigger issue. Cheers, Kai -- Kai Blin Linux system administrator Tel: Ring-86592 Allgemeine Chirurgie Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen "The first rule of magic is simple. Don't waste your time waving your hands and hoping when a rock or a club will do." -- McCloctnik the Lucid
> On Wednesday 14 August 2002 12:21, Antonio Nikolic wrote: > > > checking for _acl... no > > checking for __acl... no > > checking for _facl... no > > checking for __facl... no > > [..] > > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... > > no checking for ACL support... no > > This is exactly the same problem Stephan Pfeiffer mentioned here yesterday. > Seems like a bigger issue. > > Cheers, KaiHi, I had the same problem. I solved this (XFS+ACL+Samba) problem. I add -lattr into configure script. Find all "LIBS= -lacl" and replace "LIBS= -lacl $LIBS" by "LIBS= -lacl -lattr $LIBS" After adding configure writes: checking for ACL support... yes Using Posix ACLs. I don't know why -lattr was removed from configure script. :o( David -- David Lukastik <david.lukastik@svkuh.cz>
Hi, folks thank you for your advice, but I'm sorry to report that adding -lattr did not really help in spite of attr-dev being installed... Now, maybe it would helo, if I knew WHERE exactly configure is looking for WHICH files. Where is acl.h supposed to be for example and what other files need to be present? Or is there a specia XFSed version of attr-devel? I've tried compiling samba-2.2.4 today with the same effect as before... p.s.@Martin.Pienert>> Hey Martin, meinen Gl?ckwunsch, dass Du's p.s.@Martin.Pienert>> gepackt hast, bei mir funzt es irgendwie also p.s.@Martin.Pienert>> noch immer nicht... :-(>Hi, > >I had the same problem. >I solved this (XFS+ACL+Samba) problem. > >I add -lattr into configure script. >Find all "LIBS= -lacl" and replace "LIBS= -lacl $LIBS" by "LIBS= -lacl >-lattr $LIBS" > >After adding configure writes: >checking for ACL support... yes >Using Posix ACLs. > >I don't know why -lattr was removed from configure script. :o( > >David>>Hi all, again. >> >>I am trying to set up samba with acl-support on a debian woody (final) box. >>The kernel has got XFS-support and getfacl and setfacl are working fine since >>I have built the acl-debian packages from SGI's acl-sources. Also attr-dev, acl-dev >>and the appropriate kernel-headers are installed. The acl.h can be found in /usr/include >>But all my efforts trying to implement xfs are honored by samba with the well known conf >>messages: >> checking for _acl... no >> checking for __acl... no >> checking for _facl... no >> checking for __facl... no >> [..] >> checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no >> checking for ACL support... no >> >>I did ldconfig after installing attr-dev and removed config.cache, nothing helped! >>so, what is wrong here? what am I missing? >> >>thx in advance, >>tony.n
Antonio Nikolic wrote:>Hi all, again. > >I am trying to set up samba with acl-support on a debian woody (final) box. >The kernel has got XFS-support and getfacl and setfacl are working fine since >I have built the acl-debian packages from SGI's acl-sources. Also attr-dev, acl-dev >and the appropriate kernel-headers are installed. The acl.h can be found in /usr/include/sys/. >But all my efforts trying to implement xfs are honored by samba with the well known configure >messages: > checking for _acl... no > checking for __acl... no > checking for _facl... no > checking for __facl... no > [..] > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no > checking for ACL support... no > >I did ldconfig after installing attr-dev and removed config.cache, nothing helped! >so, what is wrong here? what am I missing? > >thx in advance, >tony.n > > > >______________________________________________________________________________ >Die clevere Geldreserve: der DiBa-Privatkredit. Funktioniert wie ein Dispo, >ist aber viel g?nstiger! Alle Infos: http://diba.web.de/?mc=021104 > > >Hmmm...I just installed a clean copy of Woody on a box. I patched my Linux sources with SGI's XFS 1.1 tarball and rolled a kernel. After a reboot, I did an 'apt-get source samba' and a 'dpkg-buildpackage'. Here's a few things I can think of: - What version of the Linux kernel did you install Woody from/are running? If you took the default, then you're running a 2.2.x kernel. I'm using a 2.4.18 kernel (At the boot prompt when initially installing Woody, type 'bf24' to install a 2.4 kernel). - When you compiled your kernel, did you include Posix ACL support (under file systems when you run 'make menuconfig'). - Before compiling the kernel, I installed Woody's acl and xfsprogs packages. Do you have them installed (it sounds like you compiled them from source). HTH, Ken McCord
Hi folks, let's summarize a bit: I have installed woody from a bootable cd with a xfs-patched kernel: 2.4.18. This kernel is still installed and running, since all options (like use POSIX ACL etc.) are set. I downloaded the kernel-headers form this one and installed them too.