search for: lacl

I have compiled both my kernel (2.4.17) and samba (2.2.3a) to support ACL/EAs. It looks like it has gone well, but I get one message that worries me, but I don't know if it should or not. checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no As you can see, the last line is where my concern lies. Can anyone shed some light on what is being done here? Thanks alot, Al Moote

...nclude/sys/. But all my efforts trying to implement xfs are honored by samba with the well known configure messages: checking for _acl... no checking for __acl... no checking for _facl... no checking for __facl... no [..] checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no I did ldconfig after installing attr-dev and removed config.cache, nothing helped! so, what is wrong here? what am I missing? thx in advance, tony.n ______________________________________________________________________________ Die clevere Geldreserve: de...

...acl-support > ~/myconfig.out 2>&1 [username@localhost source]# cat ~/myconfig.out | grep acl checking for sys/acl.h... yes checking for _acl... no checking for __acl... no checking for _facl... no checking for __facl... no checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no The log shows that acl_get_file is not found because: configure:13177: gcc -o conftest -O -O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib conftest.c -lacl -lcups -lssl -lcrypto -lnsl -lcrypt -lpam 1>&5 /lib/libacl.so: undef...

Hello ! I am using samba 3 with acl support and when I use the "hide unreadable" option, it only take the unix right. Even if they have read or write access given by acls, people have to be the owner of a directory to see it. I don't know if it's realy a bug or if i'm not using it the right way, i simply add it to a share definition. Thanks in advance ! Eric Guimont

...r@gentoo.org QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org the current output from running `./configure --enable-acl-support` after applying the acl patch looks like: <snip> checking for __facl... no checking whether to support ACLs... ACLs requested -- running tests checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no checking attr/xattr.h usability... yes </snip> trivial patch attached against the patch/acls.diff in CVS to make it read: <snip> checking for __facl... no checking whether to support ACLs... ACLs...

...ltools from bestbits. i would use an fileserver with acl support, but i have some problems. after uncompress the tar-archiv i type in the sourcedirectory: ./configure --with-quotas --with-acl-support and i get the following: "checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... (cached) no checking for ACL support... (cached) no" is this normal? well, i've done make and make install. the option <nt acl support> is availible, but it does not work. local acl works! please help! regards... -- STEPHAN PFEIFFER ICQ: 39844459 (Home) 39064604 (Work)...

...;m using redhat 7.3, with ACL support from http://acl.bestbits.at/. I've tested that the ACL is working on the filesystem, and samba can find it too. Here's the error: checking if large file support can be enabled... yes checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no checking whether to build winbind... yes checking whether to enable winbind auth challenge/response code... checking whether or not getgroups returns EGID too many times... yes checking whether struct passwd...

Hello everybody I'm hoping someone can help me with this problem. I have redhat 7.3 with the 2.4.18-3 kernel and after applying the acl patches to the kernel, running make menuconfig and make dep I then run make bzImage which produces the following error: ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux-2.4.18-3/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o

Hiya. I've got an XFS partition, have compiled and installed all the XFS stuff, then compiled (with --with-acl-support) samba, which then returns: checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs So it would seem to me that ACLs would be supported. So then I install and run it, add the box to the (Samba 2.2.2) domain, surf via Windows (W2K) to a share point, modify the ACLs on a file or directory, and save them. Everything's fi...

Thanks for the help on the missing '-p1' for the acl and xattr patches. Things are configuring and making properly now. However, I couldn't help noticing this during the configure: checking whether to support ACLs... ACLs requested -- running tests checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... yes checking ACL test results... Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... yes checking attr/xattr.h usability... no checking attr/xattr.h presence... no checking for attr/xattr.h... no checking whether to support extended attributes... Xattrs requested but...

...windows server, but the permissions that show up are unix_group 109 (server\unix_group 109) I may not have configured samba with acl support ./configure --with-acl-support So I went back and tried running that line. It reported: checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... (cached) no checking for ACL support... (cached) no Now I'm not sure where to go from here. Any ideas? Thanks, Brett -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

...solaris*|*cygwin*) + solaris*) AC_MSG_RESULT(Using solaris ACLs) AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SOLARIS_ACLS, 1, [true if you have solaris ACLs]) AC_DEFINE(SUPPORT_ACLS, 1) Configure detects the following after the above mod: $ grep -i acl config.status S["LIBS"]="-lacl " D["HAVE_SYS_ACL_H"]=" 1" D["HAVE_ACL_LIBACL_H"]=" 1" D["HAVE_ACLSORT"]=" 1" D["HAVE_LIBACL"]=" 1" D["HAVE_POSIX_ACLS"]=" 1" D["SUPPORT_ACLS"]=" 1"

...on entry to main and it segfaults faithfully. Relevant compiler flags are these: g++ -c -o whatever.o -O0 -ggdb -Wno-deprecated -Werror -fPIC -Dmanything -Imanydirs whatever.cpp g++ -o whatever -static -static-libgcc many.o -Lmanydirs -lpthread -lanotherlib -lzlib -lesmtp -lnsl -lrpcsvc -lcrypt -lacl -ldl -lrt -landmanymore So I'm looking for some guidance on what things I could try to isolate this in a smaller app. -- Darrin

...ion is dangerous and should not be used. collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1 This is how the make file looks like: LIBS=-lreadline -ldl -lcrypt -ldes425 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err -lpam -lafsauthent -lafsrpc -ldes -llwp -lrx -lrxkad -lrxstat -lubik -lacl -lafsadminutil -lafsint -laudit -lauth -lauth.krb -lbos -lbosadmin -lbubasics -lbudb -lbutm -lbxdb -lcfgadmin -lclientadmin -lcmd -ldir -lfsprobe -lgtx -lkasadmin -lkauth -lkauth.krb -lnull -lprocmgmt -lprot -lptsadmin -lsys -ltermlib -lusd -lvldb -lvolser -lvosadmin -lxstat_cm -lxstat_fs -lpthread...

I've upgraded to Samba 3.0 (samba-3.0.0.tar.bz2) from 2.2.7a and I am having troubles with the acl-support. I am running xfs with ACLs enabled and ACLs did work on Samba 2.2.7 I've compiled samba 3 --with-acl-support --with-winbind --with-quotas But I still can't get the ACLs to work. Am I missing something?

...able = yes map archive = no map read only = no map hidden = no map system = no create mode = 777 directory mode = 777 Samba configure params: --prefix=/usr/local/samba ... checking whether to support ACLs... auto configure: checking whether ACL support is available: checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for getxattr in -lattr... yes checking for POSIX ACL support... yes configure: Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no ...

...t;with-acl-support"). When I run the next command in the HowTo: cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/ && rpm -ba samba.spec I get a lot of activity on screen, ending with this: checking if large file support can be enabled... yes checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no checking whether to build winbind... yes checking whether or not getgroups returns EGID too many times... yes checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt... no checking whether to use included popt... ./popt checking configure summary... configure: error: summary fail...

...pe ext3 (rw,acl) # uname -a Linux <hostname> 2.4.22-acl #2 Mon Nov 24 14:30:54 GMT 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # ./configure --with-quotas --with-acl-support --enable-cups <snip> checking whether to support ACLs... checking for getxattr in -lattr... no checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no </snip> Red Hat 9.0 (custom kernel), Samba 3.0.0 (release) Am I missing some (kernel) headers or is something else going on here? I'd prefer to stick with ext3 if at all possible (part of disaster recovery plan)... Incidentally I can use getfacl t...

...a Linux server. I never saw anyone post anything about how to make it work. I tried, but I was never able to compile on Cygwin when I patched the source with the acls.diff patch. ./configure would error out after displaying: Checking whether to support ACLS... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no This issue was referenced in this post, but I never saw a follow up or resolution: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg01329.html Solution: ----------- Well I did some poking around the acls.diff patch and started examining the way cygwin imp...

...windows server, but the permissions that show up are unix_group 109 (server\unix_group 109) I may not have configured samba with acl support ./configure --with-acl-support So I went back and tried running that line. It reported: checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... (cached) no checking for ACL support... (cached) no Now I'm not sure where to go from here. Any ideas? Thanks, Brett