Hiya! Samba 2.0.7 on HP-UX 11.0. When a user tries to map a drive, the smb.log shows the following: NOTE: the stanza ending in PANIC repeats 3 times, snipped here for brevity ==================================== [2002/02/28 11:12:43, 1] smbd/server.c:(641) smbd version 2.0.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [2002/02/28 11:12:43, 1] smbd/files.c:(215) file_init: Information only: requested 16000 open files, 2038 are available. (I know I need to change the above, will regen the kernel later or is this causing the problem? Mike) [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> (uid=108, gid=23) (pid 18684) [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(69) Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 0] lib/util.c:(2381) PANIC: failed to set gid [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/server.c:(641) smbd version 2.0.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/files.c:(215) file_init: Information only: requested 16000 open files, 2038 are available. [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> (uid=108, gid=23) (pid 18705) [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> (uid=108, gid=23) (pid 18705) [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(581) e213845 (134.52.222.4) closed connection to service <USER> [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(213) get_share_modes: process 18407 no longer exists [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(240) get_share_modes: file with dev 40000008 inode 592 empty ==================================================== Question #1: Why does it "Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0)"? Question #2: What does the "call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented." error imply? Question #3: What does the two "get_share_modes" error imply? TIA, Mike
Hi Mike; 2.0.7 defaults 'guest account' to the user nobody, which has a uid of -1 and gid of -2; samba will core on negative uid/gid pairs. The HPUX version (CIFS/9000) defaults the guest account to 'smbnull' and adds an smbnull user (with positive uid/gid pair) for this reason. to fix this simply add the "guest account = <some valid user made for this purpose>" to the global section of smb.conf The ioctl error means just what it says - the client requested an ioctl that we don't implement - usually not a big deal; clients will typically get this response back and fall back on some other method to accomplish what they wanted to do. The get share modes error is cleanup from the fact that the previous connection cored, and left information in the sharemodes table. again no big deal - when you clean up the guest account, this will go away. Hope this helps, Don -----Original Message----- From: Kerns, Mike [mailto:mike.kerns@boeing.com] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:25 PM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: [Samba] PANIC and delayed drive mapping? Hiya! Samba 2.0.7 on HP-UX 11.0. When a user tries to map a drive, the smb.log shows the following: NOTE: the stanza ending in PANIC repeats 3 times, snipped here for brevity ==================================== [2002/02/28 11:12:43, 1] smbd/server.c:(641) smbd version 2.0.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [2002/02/28 11:12:43, 1] smbd/files.c:(215) file_init: Information only: requested 16000 open files, 2038 are available. (I know I need to change the above, will regen the kernel later or is this causing the problem? Mike) [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> (uid=108, gid=23) (pid 18684) [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(69) Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 0] lib/util.c:(2381) PANIC: failed to set gid [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/server.c:(641) smbd version 2.0.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/files.c:(215) file_init: Information only: requested 16000 open files, 2038 are available. [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> (uid=108, gid=23) (pid 18705) [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> (uid=108, gid=23) (pid 18705) [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(581) e213845 (134.52.222.4) closed connection to service <USER> [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(213) get_share_modes: process 18407 no longer exists [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(240) get_share_modes: file with dev 40000008 inode 592 empty ==================================================== Question #1: Why does it "Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0)"? Question #2: What does the "call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented." error imply? Question #3: What does the two "get_share_modes" error imply? TIA, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hiya, Don! Yes, this has helped! Does 2.2.3a have the same need for a positive integer uid/gid guest user? I just put 2.2.3a on a test server and the performance is much better. Thanks for your help! Mike> ---------- > From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)[SMTP:don_mccall@hp.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:49 AM > To: 'Kerns, Mike'; 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: RE: [Samba] PANIC and delayed drive mapping? > > Hi Mike; > 2.0.7 defaults 'guest account' to the user nobody, which has a uid of -1 > and > gid of -2; > samba will core on negative uid/gid pairs. The HPUX version (CIFS/9000) > defaults the > guest account to 'smbnull' and adds an smbnull user (with positive uid/gid > pair) for this > reason. > to fix this simply add the "guest account = <some valid user made for this > purpose>" to > the global section of smb.conf > > The ioctl error means just what it says - the client requested an ioctl > that > we don't > implement - usually not a big deal; clients will typically get this > response > back and fall > back on some other method to accomplish what they wanted to do. > > The get share modes error is cleanup from the fact that the previous > connection cored, and > left information in the sharemodes table. again no big deal - when you > clean up the > guest account, this will go away. > > Hope this helps, > Don > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kerns, Mike [mailto:mike.kerns@boeing.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:25 PM > To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: [Samba] PANIC and delayed drive mapping? > > > Hiya! > > Samba 2.0.7 on HP-UX 11.0. > > When a user tries to map a drive, the smb.log shows the following: > > NOTE: the stanza ending in PANIC repeats 3 times, snipped here for > brevity > > ====================================> > [2002/02/28 11:12:43, 1] smbd/server.c:(641) > smbd version 2.0.7 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > [2002/02/28 11:12:43, 1] smbd/files.c:(215) > file_init: Information only: requested 16000 open files, 2038 are > available. > (I know I need to change the above, will regen the kernel later or > is > this causing the problem? Mike) > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) > e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> > (uid=108, > gid=23) (pid 18684) > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(69) > Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 0] lib/util.c:(2381) > PANIC: failed to set gid > > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/server.c:(641) > smbd version 2.0.7 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/files.c:(215) > file_init: Information only: requested 16000 open files, 2038 are > available. > [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) > e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> > (uid=108, gid=23) (pid 18705) > [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) > e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> > (uid=108, > gid=23) (pid 18705) > [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(581) > e213845 (134.52.222.4) closed connection to service <USER> > [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:(2516) > call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. > [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(213) > get_share_modes: process 18407 no longer exists > [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(240) > get_share_modes: file with dev 40000008 inode 592 empty > > ====================================================> > Question #1: Why does it "Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set > to (0,0) uid=(0,0)"? > > Question #2: What does the "call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not > implemented." error imply? > > Question #3: What does the two "get_share_modes" error imply? > > TIA, > > Mike > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba >
Yes, as far as I know. Don -----Original Message----- From: Kerns, Mike [mailto:mike.kerns@boeing.com] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 4:59 PM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org'; 'MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)' Subject: RE: [Samba] PANIC and delayed drive mapping? Hiya, Don! Yes, this has helped! Does 2.2.3a have the same need for a positive integer uid/gid guest user? I just put 2.2.3a on a test server and the performance is much better. Thanks for your help! Mike> ---------- > From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)[SMTP:don_mccall@hp.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:49 AM > To: 'Kerns, Mike'; 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: RE: [Samba] PANIC and delayed drive mapping? > > Hi Mike; > 2.0.7 defaults 'guest account' to the user nobody, which has a uid of -1 > and > gid of -2; > samba will core on negative uid/gid pairs. The HPUX version (CIFS/9000) > defaults the > guest account to 'smbnull' and adds an smbnull user (with positive uid/gid > pair) for this > reason. > to fix this simply add the "guest account = <some valid user made for this > purpose>" to > the global section of smb.conf > > The ioctl error means just what it says - the client requested an ioctl > that > we don't > implement - usually not a big deal; clients will typically get this > response > back and fall > back on some other method to accomplish what they wanted to do. > > The get share modes error is cleanup from the fact that the previous > connection cored, and > left information in the sharemodes table. again no big deal - when you > clean up the > guest account, this will go away. > > Hope this helps, > Don > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kerns, Mike [mailto:mike.kerns@boeing.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:25 PM > To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: [Samba] PANIC and delayed drive mapping? > > > Hiya! > > Samba 2.0.7 on HP-UX 11.0. > > When a user tries to map a drive, the smb.log shows the following: > > NOTE: the stanza ending in PANIC repeats 3 times, snipped here for > brevity > > ====================================> > [2002/02/28 11:12:43, 1] smbd/server.c:(641) > smbd version 2.0.7 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > [2002/02/28 11:12:43, 1] smbd/files.c:(215) > file_init: Information only: requested 16000 open files, 2038 are > available. > (I know I need to change the above, will regen the kernel later or > is > this causing the problem? Mike) > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) > e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> > (uid=108, > gid=23) (pid 18684) > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(69) > Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 0] lib/util.c:(2381) > PANIC: failed to set gid > > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/server.c:(641) > smbd version 2.0.7 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > [2002/02/28 11:12:50, 1] smbd/files.c:(215) > file_init: Information only: requested 16000 open files, 2038 are > available. > [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) > e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> > (uid=108, gid=23) (pid 18705) > [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(550) > e213845 (134.52.222.4) connect to service <USER> as user <USER> > (uid=108, > gid=23) (pid 18705) > [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(581) > e213845 (134.52.222.4) closed connection to service <USER> > [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:(2516) > call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. > [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(213) > get_share_modes: process 18407 no longer exists > [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(240) > get_share_modes: file with dev 40000008 inode 592 empty > > ====================================================> > Question #1: Why does it "Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set > to (0,0) uid=(0,0)"? > > Question #2: What does the "call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not > implemented." error imply? > > Question #3: What does the two "get_share_modes" error imply? > > TIA, > > Mike > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba >