search for: call_nt_transact_ioctl

....0.6 on Solaris2.6 and use it together with clearcase (version 3.2.1). Sometimes the checkout of files from a clearcase NT-client hangs and probably causes clearcase to destroy the viewstore. In the samba logfile of that client I found the following message: [2000/02/17 09:29:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. Does this mean, that a service required from clearcase is not implemented? Is there a workaround or bugfix? Bernhard -- _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Bernhard Riegel mailto:ber...

...gol read only = No create mask = 0777 force create mode = 0777 force security mode = 0777 directory mask = 0777 force directory mode = 0777 force directory security mode = 0777 This is the log message: [2002/08/13 15:03:48, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1798) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/08/13 15:09:00, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1798) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/08/13 18:22:27, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1798) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implement...

...ave a large (8 CPUs, 32GB RAM) x86 Sun server running x8664 Debian Lenny, with Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny6. It's a BDC and file server. I have noticed various entries in the log files that I'd like to understand better. Some machines are generating this: [2009/11/16 15:10:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2019) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented. Others are generating this: [2009/11/17 10:42:57, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2019) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90060): Currently not implemented. Machines seem to generate either, but not both errors. Obviously I...

...riencing some really funky Samba errors, and I'm hoping that some of you might have some ideas. This only happens sporadically, and when it does, I loose Samba connectivity for a while. Here are my Samba logs: Jun 2 13:29:01 nasone smbd[20289]: [2004/06/02 13:29:01, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2076) Jun 2 13:29:01 nasone smbd[20289]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9009c): Currently not implemented. Jun 2 13:45:22 nasone smbd[20289]: [2004/06/02 13:45:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(304) Jun 2 13:45:22 nasone smbd[20289]: read_socket_with_timeout: timeout...

Hi William, I got no positive reply since I made my posting. Only you and another guy, who made the same experience. No answer to the question, what functionality has "call_nt_transact_ioctl" and what effect on SAMBA has the missing of this procedure. Sorry, Michael William Soudan schrieb: > Hi Michael, > > I'm getting the same message in our samba logfiles as you mentioned in your > post to the samba mailing list: > > [2000/03/06 13:37:57, 0] smbd/nttrans....

As I posted to samba@samba.org one month ago, we found the same error as Chuck Thier (smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented.) as a possible reason for some crashes of ClearCase clients on WindowsNT (we use Samba 2.0.6 on Solaris 2.6 and ClearCase 3.2.1). Therefore I support his wish, that this functionality should be implemented in samba as soon as possible. --...

All, Since upgrading to 3.0.23d on several linux servers, I'm seeing the following error repeatedly in my logs: Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: [2007/01/02 15:05:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2332) Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90078): Currently not implemented. Aside from the obvious, what does this error mean? I've googled for this specific error, but didn't have much luck. Should I just ignore these errors? So far as I can tell, service to...

I'm seeing these errors every couple minutes from my Samba server (3.0.28... RHEL5 build). [2008/09/15 11:59:44, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2463) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented. I realize what 'currently not implemented' means, and since no users have complained, I assume the message is ignorable. I was wondering however, if anyone can enlighten me as to what ioctl 0x9005c is/does, and what win...

...15:48:41, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(478) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [2002/06/24 16:15:17, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(478) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [2002/06/24 16:42:18, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1798) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/06/24 16:46:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(478) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [2002/06/24 16:54:20, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1798) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently...

Hi everybody I'm actually facing some strange messages in smb logs: our samba server is running fine but I can see a lot of this message in the log : Apr 27 13:33:53 lnx-ds01 smbd[18773]: [2009/04/27 13:33:53, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2029) Apr 27 13:33:53 lnx-ds01 smbd[18773]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90060): Currently not implemented. after sometime (one hour, one day.... it depends) samba crashes (nothing in the log), at least on the client side (no response from explorer.exe) following this crash, each new connection to t...

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312...

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312...

Robert Dal Santo wrote: > Is there any work underway to get Samba to support OPLOCKS? I know > they are difficult to implement but I'm faced with a decisions now to buy an > NT box (Ugh!) or do a lot of messing around to get this application > to perform decently. The application in questions takes around 5 > hours to do a taks without OPLOCKS and around an hour to do the

...I use samba to act as an NT server for 6 XP pro clients running MS Access database. In my log files I consitanty have the following error which seems to occur when there is more that one user accessing the database: Feb 27 11:36:24 fileserver smbd[11192]: [2010/02/27 11:36:24, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2463) Feb 27 11:36:24 fileserver smbd[11192]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x900eb): Currently not implemented. Despite this error there seems to be no effect on performance. I have googled around and seen the same arror reported before but no definative answer. Thanks My smb.conf [global] l...

Hello, I just upgraded from 2.05a to 2.0.7 on a RH 6.0 system, upgraded one of the workstations to win2k pro, and didn't change anything to my smb.conf.

Hiya, Can someone explain why I am seeing chmod of W32X86/3/PSCRIPT5.DLL failed (Operation not permitted) in the log files. It is a samba 3.0.1pre3 print server, which has the drivers on it for loading to the clients. Here is the log file of errors. Thanx in advanced Kris [2003/11/27 16:29:15, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(250) aclarke opened file W32X86/3/PSCRIPT.HLP read=Yes write=No

...wing no other files open. File is not always the same. Samba log errors from last backup: [2005/05/22 01:00:20, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) server (192.168.123.20) connect to service backup initially as user root (uid=0, gid=0) (pid 1330) [2005/05/22 01:02:40, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2269) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9009c): Currently not implemented. [2005/05/22 02:23:08, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(384) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [2005/05/22 02:23:08, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(837) server (192.168.123.20) closed connec...

Hello all, Got SAMBA running on a linux 2.0.32 box, and all is well. Looked over the docs and set up my printer with the (what I think) are correct entries. Basically, what the default smb.conf has. Testparms says it o.k.! And I can print (lpr) locally. Windows sees both printcap entries (inkjet and psjet), but any attempt to pring to them errors out. I then added the print command =

This message I found in my smb log file : [2000/01/31 08:56:47, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2387) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. corresponding code in nttrans.c : /****************************************************************** ********** Reply to IOCTL - not implemented - no plans. ******************************************************************* *********/...

...1632 ? S 13:06 1:06 smbd -D I have also looked at the logs, again nothing... [1999/09/08 09:02:38, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(488) jean-michel (137.100.98.16) connect to service AIGFPDev as user aigfpdev (uid= 503, gid=510) (pid 25639) [1999/09/08 09:17:08, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1838) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [1999/09/10 13:01:30, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(514) jean-michel (137.100.98.16) closed connection to service AIGFPDev [1999/09/10 13:06:03, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(488) jean-michel (137.100.98.16) connect to service AIGFPD...