search for: locking_shm

...on the samba drive, but when I try and open an oracle form file on the samba drive, form reports an error opening the file. [1999/08/21 09:23:11, 1] smbd/service.c:(521) master (10.140.30.15) connect to service oracle as user master (uid=204, gid=100) (pid 7281) [1999/08/21 09:23:11, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(213) get_share_modes: process 7073 no longer exists [1999/08/21 09:23:12, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(241) get_share_modes: file with dev 1ac inode 253 empty [1999/08/21 09:23:12, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(213) get_share_modes: process 7073 no longer exists [1999/08/21 09:23:12, 0] locking/l...

...PDC for another domain. authentifications works well. I include here a part of the logs, if someone can help me to understand what's happening, because there is surely something I forgot to do... :) Please look especially to "error" lines. +++++++++ [1999/05/28 08:56:33, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_del_share_mode(376) del_share_modes num entries = 0, deleting share_mode dev=808 ino=1574994 [1999/05/28 08:56:33, 3] smbd/open.c:fd_attempt_close(158) fd_attempt_close fd = 8, dev = 808, inode = 1574994, open_flags = 2, ref_count = 1. [1999/05/28 08:56:33, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_fi...

...the disk is full and or that there are too many files open. The problem is not reproducable, but only happens from time to time (say every few hours). I've had a look at the samba logs for his pc and this is what happens at the time that he has the error. [1999/01/27 16:32:07, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_set_share_mode(486) PANIC ERROR:set_share_mode num_share_mode_entries=-12 [1999/01/27 16:32:07, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_del_share_mode(354) del_share_modes Deleting share mode entry dev=800047 ino=464779 [1999/01/27 16:32:07, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_del_share_mode(367) PANI...

...as user <USER> (uid=108, gid=23) (pid 18705) [2002/02/28 11:12:58, 1] smbd/service.c:(581) e213845 (134.52.222.4) closed connection to service <USER> [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(213) get_share_modes: process 18407 no longer exists [2002/02/28 11:13:04, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:(240) get_share_modes: file with dev 40000008 inode 592 empty ===================================================== Question #1: Why does it "Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) no...

...(uid=1006, gid=1) (pid 4857) [2002/09/19 12:02:27, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(582) samba opened file SAMBA.mZaiFj read=No write=Yes (numopen=1) [2002/09/19 12:02:27, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2387) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2002/09/19 12:02:27, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_del_share_mode(355) del_share_modes Deleting share mode entry dev=1980085 ino=120965 [2002/09/19 12:02:27, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_del_share_mode(376) del_share_modes num entries = 0, deleting share_mode dev=1980085 ino=120965 [2002/09/19 12:02:27, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(1...

...e to our system, so it is conceivable that > the problem may be with that, but I think it more likely that it is to > do with samba (since errors are reported in the log files). ..... > Here's some more errors that have arisen in his logfile. > > [1999/01/27 16:54:40, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(168) > get_share_modes: malloc fail! > [1999/01/27 16:54:40, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(212) > get_share_modes: process 6629 no longer exists > [1999/01/27 16:54:40, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(240) > get_share_modes: fil...

...e point after a significant number of users have connected to the Samba server, smbstatus starts crashing with a bus error. In this state, it will report on the connections but fails when looking at the locks. I had a go at running gdb on the program and have located the point of failure in "locking_shm.c" in the shm_share_forall routine: line 636 (gdb) s shm_offset2addr (offset=1096040751) at ../locking/shmem_sysv.c:154 154 if (offset == 0 ) (gdb) s 157 if (!shm_header_p) (gdb) s 160 return (void *)((char *)shm_header_p + offset); (gdb) s 161 } (gdb) s shm_share_for...

...e point after a significant number of users have connected to the Samba server, smbstatus starts crashing with a bus error. In this state, it will report on the connections but fails when looking at the locks. I had a go at running gdb on the program and have located the point of failure in "locking_shm.c" in the "shm_share_forall" routine: line 636 (gdb) s shm_offset2addr (offset=1096040751) at ../locking/shmem_sysv.c:154 154 if (offset == 0 ) (gdb) s 157 if (!shm_header_p) (gdb) s 160 return (void *)((char *)shm_header_p + offset); (gdb) s 161 } (gdb) s s...

...max=8192 nread=5385 [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/process.c:(565) Transaction 202300 of length 46 [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/process.c:(402) switch message SMBclose (pid 26589) [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/reply.c:(2637) close fd=15 fnum=5054 (numopen=11) [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:(353) del_share_modes Deleting share mode entry dev=7201600 ino=47318 [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:(374) del_share_modes num entries = 0, deleting share_mode dev=7201600 ino=47318 [1999/01/21 14:02:33, 3] smbd/open.c:(155) fd_attempt_close fd = 15, dev = 7201600, inode = 47...

...ifests itself as a "File read error" in Microsoft Access. Also, Pegasus mail GPFs - which is how it normally reacts when the network goes down. There doesn't seem to be anything untoward in the logs except the following lines appear quite often: [1999/01/08 08:50:26, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(212) get_share_modes: process 12008 no longer exists [1999/01/08 08:50:26, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(240) get_share_modes: file with dev 880039 inode 1797328 empty and there was also a line which said: [1999/01/08 09:11:06, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(2...

...------------------------- 19059 DENY_ALL RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /home/hpdrc-people-6/petrovm/Netscape/Users/default/mail/Inbox.snm Tue Jan 11 10:40:04 2000 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x1dfdc in shm_share_forall (fn=0x1b3cc <print_share_mode>) at locking/locking_shm.c:636 636 if (process_exists(entry_scanner_p->e.pid)) { (gdb) where #0 0x1dfdc in shm_share_forall (fn=0x1b3cc <print_share_mode>) at locking/locking_shm.c:636 #1 0x1c668 in share_mode_forall (fn=0x1b3cc <print_share_mode>) at locking/loc...

...is_in_path: no name list. [2003/04/02 15:18:48, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(522) unix_clean_name [rh/reshum1.exe] [2003/04/02 15:18:48, 5] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(229) get_share_modes Read share mode 0x8020 pid=25736 [2003/04/02 15:18:48, 5] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(254) get_share_modes: file with dev 80...

...ba 2.0.x and the 64 bit aspect of Solaris 2.6 (Sparc, not Intel). Specifically, it's the configure script that compiles the program. The configure script sets CPPFLAGS to -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. This evidently screws up the offset calculations for identifying locks in the locking_shm.c routines. I have no idea why you would want to compile large file support into Samba as neither Windows, nor Linux, can currently handle large files. Samba compiles with warning messages about shifting counts being too big (ntrans.c, reply.c, trans2.c and util.c) when the large file support fla...

...me(522) unix_clean_name [/FABERLAB/suse.iso] [2000/06/02 15:17:32, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(522) unix_clean_name [FABERLAB/suse.iso] [2000/06/02 15:17:32, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(599) maurice opened file FABERLAB/suse.iso read=No write=Yes (numopen=1) [2000/06/02 15:17:32, 3] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_set_share_mode(455) set_share_mode: Created share record for FABERLAB/suse.iso (dev 690 inode 44818) [2000/06/02 15:17:32, 3] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_set_share_mode(494) set_share_mode: Created share entry for FABERLAB/suse.iso with mode 0x11 pid=787 [2000/06/02 15:17:32, 3] smbd/pr...

...clean_name [test.sh] [2005/04/22 12:21:36.364473, 2, pid=19888, effective(4294967294, 4294967294), real(0, 0)] smbd/open.c:open_file(602) iusr_hopper opened file test.sh read=No write=Yes (numopen=1) [2005/04/22 12:21:36.364579, 3, pid=19888, effective(4294967294, 4294967294), real(0, 0)] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_set_share_mode(456) set_share_mode: Created share record for test.sh (dev a0007 inode 8193) [2005/04/22 12:21:36.364683, 3, pid=19888, effective(4294967294, 4294967294), real(0, 0)] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_set_share_mode(495) set_share_mode: Created share entry for test.sh with mode 0x2...

vince@rti.com (Vince Chen) write: >We upgraded from samba 1.9.17 to 1.9.18 (now running p7) in hopes of >solving file-corruption problems when large files are copied to >NT from our IRIX 6.2 samba server. > >Has anyone see any file corruption? This won't solve your problem, but I just ran some tests copying a large file from NT to FreeBSD2.2.6 and back, w/o any sign of

...on(521) pc000320 (aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd) connect to service LSW as user ottone (uid=31053, gid=207) (pid 26890) [1999/09/20 17:12:13, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(521) pc000320 (aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd) connect to service LSW as user ottone (uid=31053, gid=207) (pid 538) [1999/09/20 17:12:13, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(213) get_share_modes: process 26890 no longer exists [1999/09/20 17:12:13, 0] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_get_share_modes(241) get_share_modes: file with dev 40010001 inode 315642 empty [1999/09/20 17:12:23, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(905) oplock_break resend [1999/09/2...

...406) Jan 18 18:10:21 gate smbd[5872]: Closing connections Jan 18 18:10:21 gate smbd[5872]: [1999/01/18 18:10:21, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(514) Jan 18 18:10:21 gate smbd[5872]: ost6 (0.0.0.0) closed connection to service virus Jan 18 18:10:21 gate smbd[5872]: [1999/01/18 18:10:21, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_del_share_mode(354) Jan 18 18:10:21 gate smbd[5872]: del_share_modes Deleting share mode entry dev=301 ino=620605 Jan 18 18:10:21 gate smbd[5872]: [1999/01/18 18:10:21, 2] locking/locking_shm.c:shm_del_share_mode(375) Jan 18 18:10:21 gate smbd[5872]: del_share_modes num entries = 0, delet...

...rrently in BRANCH_NTDOM. > Specifically > how is smbstatus getting the information. through locking.c, which has a higher order function table. one of the things that can be done is to enumerate through the open files and open sessions, regardless of whether you are doing FAST_SHARE_MODES (locking_shm.c) or the old slow file-based share modes (locking_slow.c) > By some sort of interprocess communication > with the smbd processes? correct. i'm just having to look at this, to be able to imlement "remote" smbstatus commands in smbclient. luke <a href="mailto:lkcl...

I'm looking at migrating a small Netware 3.12 server to a Linux box with samba for a small office. They use a DOS program called `ACCPAC' to do their accounting; both the program and it's data reside on different exported volumes on the netware system. I set up a linux box (for testing- deployment later, maybe) to make sure the program would run with samba before going ahead and just