I'm just curious to see if I'm fighting an uphill battle that isn't
really
necessary. Is anyone out there NOT using PAM, running Samba and winbind on
Solaris 8? Maybe my problems are related to my attempt to keep it simple
and not use pam.
-Dan
Daniel J. Thomas
Systems Administrator
Johns Hopkins University
Applied Physics Laboratory
Laurel, MD
Balt: (443) 778-7924
Wash: (240) 228-7924
"Always avoid a bad file copy...
You can never know when your replication proceeds you."
-Anonymous Author
"Thomas, Daniel J." wrote:> > I'm just curious to see if I'm fighting an uphill battle that isn't really > necessary. Is anyone out there NOT using PAM, running Samba and winbind on > Solaris 8? Maybe my problems are related to my attempt to keep it simple > and not use pam.Nothing in winbind requires PAM. pam_winbind just provides an authenticaion service that may or may not be needed at your site - and is not used by Samba itself. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett abartlet@pcug.org.au Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet@samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet@hawkerc.net http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Known limitations? (IRIX + Samba 2.2.3a + Winbind)
- "ld.so.1: ls: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/nss_ winbind.so.1: symbol socket: referenced symbol not found" - Samba Team?
- Problems with large trusted domains?
- What are these programs?
- Sharing to domain users?