I'm just curious to see if I'm fighting an uphill battle that isn't really necessary. Is anyone out there NOT using PAM, running Samba and winbind on Solaris 8? Maybe my problems are related to my attempt to keep it simple and not use pam. -Dan Daniel J. Thomas Systems Administrator Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, MD Balt: (443) 778-7924 Wash: (240) 228-7924 "Always avoid a bad file copy... You can never know when your replication proceeds you." -Anonymous Author
"Thomas, Daniel J." wrote:> > I'm just curious to see if I'm fighting an uphill battle that isn't really > necessary. Is anyone out there NOT using PAM, running Samba and winbind on > Solaris 8? Maybe my problems are related to my attempt to keep it simple > and not use pam.Nothing in winbind requires PAM. pam_winbind just provides an authenticaion service that may or may not be needed at your site - and is not used by Samba itself. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett abartlet@pcug.org.au Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet@samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet@hawkerc.net http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Known limitations? (IRIX + Samba 2.2.3a + Winbind)
- "ld.so.1: ls: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/nss_ winbind.so.1: symbol socket: referenced symbol not found" - Samba Team?
- Problems with large trusted domains?
- What are these programs?
- Sharing to domain users?