OOOOKay. Here's my somewhat silly question. the 2.2.2 whatsnew says: nt acl support This parameter has been changed to a per-share option, and is very useful in enabling Windows 2000 SP2 to load/save profiles from a Samba share. Here's the dilemmna. I have no NT server. However under win9X networking - access control tab, you can either give share level, on a machine by machine basis, or user level. I have not (am I just being stupid here?) seen ANYTHING that talks about implementing ACL support previously for SAMBA only implementations. Is this what I've been looking for?? Or have I missed it for ages?? Thanks Mitch B
If all you are using is Win9x, then there is really no advantage to setting up a domain and therefore acl will not be an issue to you. Greg Zartman> -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of mitchlist > Sent: Wednesday, 31 October 2001 12:05 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: New 2.2.2 question/ACL Lists > > > > OOOOKay. Here's my somewhat silly question. > > the 2.2.2 whatsnew says: > nt acl support > This parameter has been changed to a per-share option, and is > very useful in enabling Windows 2000 SP2 to load/save profiles > from a Samba share. > > Here's the dilemmna. > > I have no NT server. However under win9X networking - access > control tab, you can either give share level, on a machine by > machine basis, or user level. > > I have not (am I just being stupid here?) seen ANYTHING > that talks about implementing ACL support previously for SAMBA > only implementations. > > Is this what I've been looking for?? Or have I missed it for > ages?? > Thanks > Mitch B > > > > > >
Reasonably Related Threads
- uidNumber. ( Was: What is --rfc2307-from-nss ??)
- uidNumber. ( Was: What is --rfc2307-from-nss ??)
- COURT solicited comments!: Was: Analysis of the Microsoft Settlement from a Samba perspective.
- uidNumber. ( Was: What is --rfc2307-from-nss ??)
- ADS Domain Member Workgroup vs Realm