samba-bugs@samba.org
2008-Apr-19 02:12 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5404] New: rsync --dry-run should show where files will go
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5404 Summary: rsync --dry-run should show where files will go Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: nlevitt@gmail.com QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org Multiple times I've run rsync -n (aka --dry-run) to check if the files I'm transferring are gonna go where I want them to, to make sure I've got trailing slashes in the right spots and such. But it does not tell me, which is very frustrating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs@samba.org
2008-Apr-19 02:24 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5404] rsync --dry-run should show where files will go
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5404 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #1 from wayned@samba.org 2008-04-18 21:24 CST ------- I'd suggest using -i (--itemize-changes) with -n. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs@samba.org
2008-Apr-26 00:10 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5404] rsync --dry-run should show where files will go
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5404 nlevitt@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Comment #2 from nlevitt@gmail.com 2008-04-25 19:10 CST ------- I hope reopening the bug doesn't violate etiquette. But -i gives me little satisfaction. As the man page says, the output is utterly cryptic, and amongst the zillions of options, -i is very obscure. Why not have -n print something like this, kind of like "/bin/cp -v", for each file: /source/path/file -> dest-host:/dest/path/file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs@samba.org
2008-Apr-26 06:51 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5404] rsync --dry-run should show where files will go
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5404 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #3 from wayned@samba.org 2008-04-26 01:50 CST ------- Sorry, I wouldn't like such an output. --dry-run tells rsync to just not do the copy, not become overly repetitive in its output strings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Reasonably Related Threads
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5792] New: rsync fails to log files "sent" with options: --itemize-changes -n --log-file
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4787] New: add support for --max-delete=N where N is less than 0
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7109] New: Need to define NO_SYMLINK_XATTR on Linux
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6251] New: security: rsync executes remote commands
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5728] New: Rsync --min-size and --max-size filter too late in the process.