KathysKode-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
2008-Oct-19 04:24 UTC
Does anybody out there use Litespeed?
I''ve heard good things about Litespeed but all the documentation I''ve found doesn''t reflect the new 3.3 version. The older 2 and 1 versions are just so different. I''ve gone down the road with the old docs and it''s always a dead end. I''d be happy to pay or trade code or some kind of programming favors for some help in this area. I''ve got some good projects under my belt. Thank you, Kathleen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
KathysKode-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:> I''ve heard good things about Litespeed but all the documentation I''ve > found doesn''t reflect the new 3.3 version. The older 2 and 1 versions > are just so different. I''ve gone down the road with the old docs and > it''s always a dead end. > I''d be happy to pay or trade code or some kind of programming favors > for some help in this area. > I''ve got some good projects under my belt. > Thank you, > KathleenI used LiteSpeed for a while. It is very easy to administer once you wrap your head around how it''s done. It''s also reasonably fast. I turned it off when I needed to have a WebDAV share running, which LiteSpeed doesn''t support. In order to do WebDAV, you have to run another web server (Apache) and do some redirection. I figured if I had to run Apache anyway, I''d use it to serve up my Rails apps as well. I had used Mongrel in the past, but took the opportunity to give Passenger a try. Overall, I''m happier now. The big downside for LiteSpeed, in my opinion, is that the free version is 32 bit and supports only one processor. I run a 64 bit slice on SliceHost, so I had to have the 32 bit compatibility libraries installed (which isn''t too big of a deal) and it would use only one processor. I don''t remember the pricing structure, but the license I was considering if I went "enterprise" was going to run about $700 per year. For a real business making real money, that might not be so bad, but for a single person running tight finances, it didn''t make sense to license LiteSpeed when I can run Apache (or Nginx, Lightttpd, etc) for free. As usual, your mileage may vary. Peace. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [SEC] Latest LiteSpeed ruby-lsapi does not vulnerable to the cgi.rb 99% CPU DoS attack
- LiteSpeed
- LiteSpeed Web Server 2.2 with Ruby Rails integration....
- How do I use GDB to debug Litespeed Server?
- Images larger than 40k uploaded with attachment_fu won't display