Hey, I have a CMS I am building right now and I would like to my articles to split in many pages. Here is what I want to do: Once the article reaches 150 words or so it create a link to Page 2 of the article and, on page 2, it displays the rest of the article... How can I do that ? (note that you explain this to a beginner :) Thank you! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Weirdmonkey, I will not speak for everyone, but I''d rather see your answer at least addressed than go unanswered. Your question is very vague and could be implemented more ways than members on this list. You admit that you are a beginner, so I would study up a bit on your string routines and begin to design and implement this system with your own ideas, then when you come up against a specific problem, ask the list. It will be much more responsive. This is also the only way you will really learn. I am not speaking out of criticism, but just trying to help you use the list to it''s best potential and also further your development skills. It seems like your question is almost, how do I build a CMS system? Maybe I have missed the main intent of the question, and if so, maybe if you restate it others will understand it better as well as myself. Jeremy On Mar 29, 2006, at 4:36 PM, weirdmonkey wrote:> Hey, > > I have a CMS I am building right now and I would like to my > articles to > split in many pages. > > Here is what I want to do: > > Once the article reaches 150 words or so it create a link to Page 2 of > the article and, on page 2, it displays the rest of the article... > > > How can I do that ? > (note that you explain this to a beginner :)
Jeremy,
I understand that my question my be a little vague.
Here are more details:
It is a website for books summary
I build a scaffold to be able to enter new summaries with ease.
I call the summary in the view using <%= book.summary %> and would like
to implement the truncate method to it.
(http://api.rubyonrails.com/classes/ActionView/Helpers/TextHelper.html#M000502)
What I would like to do is:
-If the # of the number of words exceed 200 for example, it will create:
Part1 ---> word 1 to word 200
Part2 ---> word 201 to 400
Part3 ---> word 401 to ...
etc...
If the number of words in Part 1 exceeds 200 words, it will place a link
to Part 2 at the bottom and so on...
I hope it clearer for you now :)
Thank you!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
I think you''ll want to implement this back in your model. So rather than using <%= book.summary => in your view you''ll use <%= book.summary_page(1) => <%= book.summary_page(2) => etc... book.summary_page(n) will get the appropriate chunk of text for the current page. Try something like that and see how you travel. cheers, Ben -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060330/7599d281/attachment.html
Ben and Kaz Askins wrote:> I think you''ll want to implement this back in your model. So rather > than using <%= book.summary => in your view you''ll use <%= > book.summary_page(1) => <%= book.summary_page(2) => etc... > > book.summary_page (n) will get the appropriate chunk of text for the > current page. Try something like that and see how you travel. >I tried something a little like that a couple of projects ago. Where I ended up having problems was how to deal with HTML tags in the text. I ended up with a separate Page model, and just let the users do the splitting in the end. Much simpler :-) -- Alex
Alex Young wrote:> Ben and Kaz Askins wrote: >> I think you''ll want to implement this back in your model. So rather >> than using <%= book.summary => in your view you''ll use <%= >> book.summary_page(1) => <%= book.summary_page(2) => etc... >> >> book.summary_page (n) will get the appropriate chunk of text for the >> current page. Try something like that and see how you travel. >> > I tried something a little like that a couple of projects ago. Where I > ended up having problems was how to deal with HTML tags in the text. I > ended up with a separate Page model, and just let the users do the > splitting in the end. Much simpler :-)Hi Alex, I don''t get it, can you explain further ? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
weirdmonkey wrote:> Alex Young wrote: >> Ben and Kaz Askins wrote: >>> I think you''ll want to implement this back in your model. So rather >>> than using <%= book.summary => in your view you''ll use <%= >>> book.summary_page(1) => <%= book.summary_page(2) => etc... >>> >>> book.summary_page (n) will get the appropriate chunk of text for the >>> current page. Try something like that and see how you travel. >>> >> I tried something a little like that a couple of projects ago. Where I >> ended up having problems was how to deal with HTML tags in the text. I >> ended up with a separate Page model, and just let the users do the >> splitting in the end. Much simpler :-) > > Hi Alex, > > I don''t get it, can you explain further ? >Sure. Because splitting a long body of text reliably and well is hard to get right (you don''t want to split in the middle of a sentence, you don''t want to leave dangling sentences, you can''t break markup, images might want to stay on the same page as a specific piece of text, and so on), don''t store the text in a single field in the Book model. Rather, do something like this: create table books ( id int not null auto_increment primary key, title text -- whatever else you need here... ); create table pages ( id... book_id int, position int, content text -- whatever else you need here... ); Then your models could look like this: class Book < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :pages, :order => "position", :dependent => :delete end class Page < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :book acts_as_list :scope => :book end Now, in your interface, you can allow the users to create pages as they need them, putting the breaks where it makes sense in the text. You can still validate new pages as being shorter than a given limit if you want to, but there''s no need to do any more than that. I''ve found that the users I deal with are fairly happy to do things that way. Hope this helps... -- Alex