Rails - Jan 2006 - RaislsEdge - where to get latest javascripts ?

To play with RJS I just made a "rake freeze edge". But this copies
only the
libs into vendor/rails and any attempt of "rake update_javascripts"
fails.

But all the he required  javascripts are there, at:
BASEPATH/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/javascripts/

Except of prototype, they seem to have no version number, so I am asking
whether I should take those javascript files from there or checkout the
whole rails trunk and get them form  Dir[RAILTIES_PATH +
''/html/javascripts/*.js''] ?

--
Roberto Saccon - http://rsaccon.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060108/df8bc8d1/attachment.html

> Except of prototype, they seem to have no version number, so I am asking
"rake update_javascripts" -- that''ll give you the latest
javascripts
from the current Rails you''re running. And when you''re running
edge,
that means edge js.
--
David Heinemeier Hansson
http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain
http://www.basecamphq.com   -- Online project management
http://www.backpackit.com   -- Personal information manager
http://www.rubyonrails.com  -- Web-application framework

A quick look at the soure repository shows that the javascripts are from the
same revison, so now maybe I should change my question: why do we have the
same set of scripts at two diffferent locations ?

On 1/8/06, Roberto Saccon <rsaccon@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> To play with RJS I just made a "rake freeze edge". But this
copies only
> the libs into vendor/rails and any attempt of "rake
update_javascripts"
> fails.
>
> But all the he required  javascripts are there, at:
> BASEPATH/vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/javascripts/
>
> Except of prototype, they seem to have no version number, so I am asking
> whether I should take those javascript files from there or checkout the
> whole rails trunk and get them form  Dir[RAILTIES_PATH +
> ''/html/javascripts/*.js''] ?
>
> --
> Roberto Saccon - http://rsaccon.com



--
Roberto Saccon - http://rsaccon.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060108/eb446ec3/attachment.html

> > Except of prototype, they seem to have no version number, so I am
asking
>
> "rake update_javascripts" -- that''ll give you the latest
javascripts
> from the current Rails you''re running. And when you''re
running edge,
> that means edge js.
Wups, seems that you already did that. What''s the failure?
--
David Heinemeier Hansson
http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain
http://www.basecamphq.com   -- Online project management
http://www.backpackit.com   -- Personal information manager
http://www.rubyonrails.com  -- Web-application framework

> A quick look at the soure repository shows that the javascripts are from
the
> same revison, so now maybe I should change my question: why do we have the
> same set of scripts at two diffferent locations ?
Because they need to go in both the Rails package and in the Action
Pack package. Believe it or not, the later can actually be used as a
stand-alone framework :). Not a ton of people are doing that, though.
--
David Heinemeier Hansson
http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain
http://www.basecamphq.com   -- Online project management
http://www.backpackit.com   -- Personal information manager
http://www.rubyonrails.com  -- Web-application framework

On 1/8/06, Roberto Saccon <rsaccon@gmail.com>
wrote:
> A quick look at the soure repository shows that the javascripts are from
the
> same revison, so now maybe I should change my question: why do we have the
> same set of scripts at two diffferent locations ?
Action Pack has its own JS so that it can be used independently of
Rails. Running "rake update_javascripts" copies the scripts from
Railties'' html/javascripts/ directory. Both sets of scripts should
always be identical.

--
sam

thanks, now everything makes sense !

On 1/8/06, Sam Stephenson <sstephenson@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On 1/8/06, Roberto Saccon <rsaccon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A quick look at the soure repository shows that the javascripts are
from
> the
> > same revison, so now maybe I should change my question: why do we have
> the
> > same set of scripts at two diffferent locations ?
>
> Action Pack has its own JS so that it can be used independently of
> Rails. Running "rake update_javascripts" copies the scripts from
> Railties'' html/javascripts/ directory. Both sets of scripts should
> always be identical.
>
> --
> sam
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>


--
Roberto Saccon - http://rsaccon.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060108/eaae6171/attachment.html

(wow, this is an old thread)

I noticed that "rake update_javascripts" also copies over  
application.js. This is disastrous if you already have code in that  
file. My opinion is that this should either:
1. not copy it
2. ask to overwrite if we have put in something in there other than the  
default contents



kamal

On Sunday, January 08, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Sam Stephenson
wrote:
>On 1/8/06, Roberto Saccon <rsaccon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> A quick look at the soure repository shows that the javascripts
>>are from the
>> same revison, so now maybe I should change my question: why do we
>>have the
>> same set of scripts at two diffferent locations ?
>
>Action Pack has its own JS so that it can be used independently of
>Rails. Running "rake update_javascripts" copies the scripts from
>Railties'' html/javascripts/ directory. Both sets of scripts should
>always be identical.
>
>--
>sam
>_______________________________________________
>Rails mailing list
>Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
>http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails




-- 
Posted with http://DevLists.com.  Sign up and save your time!

This has been fixed in http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/3863

On 13 Mar 2006 08:47:31 -0000, Kamal Fariz
<devlists-rubyonrails@devlists.com> wrote:
> (wow, this is an old thread)
>
> I noticed that "rake update_javascripts" also copies over
> application.js. This is disastrous if you already have code in that
> file. My opinion is that this should either:
> 1. not copy it
> 2. ask to overwrite if we have put in something in there other than the
> default contents
>
>
>
> kamal
>
> On Sunday, January 08, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Sam Stephenson wrote:
> >On 1/8/06, Roberto Saccon <rsaccon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> A quick look at the soure repository shows that the javascripts
> >>are from the
> >> same revison, so now maybe I should change my question: why do we
> >>have the
> >> same set of scripts at two diffferent locations ?
> >
> >Action Pack has its own JS so that it can be used independently of
> >Rails. Running "rake update_javascripts" copies the scripts
from
> >Railties'' html/javascripts/ directory. Both sets of scripts
should
> >always be identical.
> >
> >--
> >sam
> >_______________________________________________
> >Rails mailing list
> >Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> >http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Posted with http://DevLists.com.  Sign up and save your time!
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>

--
Cody Fauser
http://www.codyfauser.com