The lattice package uses special logic to allow for multiple left-hand-side variables in a formula, e.g. y1 + y2 ~ x. Is there an elegant way to do this outside of lattice? I'm trying to implement a data summarization function that logically takes multiple dependent variables. The usual invocation of model.frame( ) causes R to try to do arithmetic addition to create a single dependent variable. Thanks Frank ----- Frank Harrell Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Multiple-left-hand-side-variables-in-a-formula-tp4660060.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Gabor Grothendieck
2013-Mar-02 00:50 UTC
[R] Multiple left hand side variables in a formula
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Frank Harrell <f.harrell at vanderbilt.edu> wrote:> The lattice package uses special logic to allow for multiple left-hand-side > variables in a formula, e.g. y1 + y2 ~ x. Is there an elegant way to do > this outside of lattice? I'm trying to implement a data summarization > function that logically takes multiple dependent variables. The usual > invocation of model.frame( ) causes R to try to do arithmetic addition to > create a single dependent variable. >Try: lm( cbind(Sepal.Length, Sepal.Width) ~., iris) -- Statistics & Software Consulting GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc. tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com
I don't know how much of the information that model.frame supplies you need,
but you could make a data.frame containing all the variables on both sides of
them
formula by changing lhs~rhs into ~lhs+rsh before calling model.frame. E.g.,
f <- function (formula) {
if (length(formula) == 3) { # has left hand side
envir <- environment(formula)
formula <- formula(call("~", call("+",
formula[[2]], formula[[3]])))
environment(formula) <- envir
}
formula
}
This doesn't quite take care of the wild-card dot in the formula: straight
variables are omitted from dot's expansion but functions of variables are
not:> colnames(model.frame(f(log(mpg)+hp ~ .), data=mtcars))
[1] "log(mpg)" "hp" "mpg"
"cyl"
[5] "disp" "drat" "wt"
"qsec"
[9] "vs" "am" "gear"
"carb"
Bill Dunlap
Spotfire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at
r-project.org] On Behalf
> Of Frank Harrell
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 4:17 PM
> To: r-help at r-project.org
> Subject: [R] Multiple left hand side variables in a formula
>
> The lattice package uses special logic to allow for multiple left-hand-side
> variables in a formula, e.g. y1 + y2 ~ x. Is there an elegant way to do
> this outside of lattice? I'm trying to implement a data summarization
> function that logically takes multiple dependent variables. The usual
> invocation of model.frame( ) causes R to try to do arithmetic addition to
> create a single dependent variable.
>
> Thanks
> Frank
>
>
>
> -----
> Frank Harrell
> Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University
> --
> View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Multiple-left-hand-side-
> variables-in-a-formula-tp4660060.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Reasonably Related Threads
- Bug in by() function which works for some FUN argument and does not work for others
- Does a formula object have a "left hand side"
- Bug in by() function which works for some FUN argument and does not work for others
- Bug in by() function which works for some FUN argument and does not work for others
- Resultado de la consola como un tibble