Dennis Fisher
2010-Dec-12 16:13 UTC
[R] Submissions that include an entire previous digest
Colleagues, Today's digest (Volume 94, Issue 12) contained an entire copy of Digest, Vol 94, Issue 11. It appears that an inconsiderate poster (Message 39 in Issue 12) received the digest and clicked reply, thereby including the entire digest in his/her submission (> 6000 additional lines of text). This made it difficult to scroll through the digest efficiently. At minimum, posters should be aware that this is inconsiderable behavior. Is there some means for the mailing list to detect submissions that contain the entirety of a previous digest (e.g., rejecting emails that contain both "Subject: R-help Digest, Vol XX, Issue YY" and "End of R-help Digest, Vol XX, Issue YY") to prevent this problem? Dennis Dennis Fisher MD P < (The "P Less Than" Company) Phone: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-753-7784) Fax: 1-866-PLessThan (1-866-753-7784) www.PLessThan.com
Dirk Eddelbuettel
2010-Dec-12 16:50 UTC
[R] Submissions that include an entire previous digest
On 12 December 2010 at 08:13, Dennis Fisher wrote: | Colleagues, | | Today's digest (Volume 94, Issue 12) contained an entire copy of Digest, Vol 94, Issue 11. It appears that an inconsiderate poster (Message 39 in Issue 12) received the digest and clicked reply, thereby including the entire digest in his/her submission (> 6000 additional lines of text). This made it difficult to scroll through the digest efficiently. | | At minimum, posters should be aware that this is inconsiderable behavior. | | Is there some means for the mailing list to detect submissions that contain the entirety of a previous digest (e.g., rejecting emails that contain both "Subject: R-help Digest, Vol XX, Issue YY" and "End of R-help Digest, Vol XX, Issue YY") to prevent this problem? By default, mailman (the Python software running this and many other mailing lists) has a default size of 40 kB per post. Default behaviour is to let the moderator handle the post, one could also automatically reject it. We could obviously dial the size down. And speaking just for myself, I would have no problem unsubscribing serial abusers of the list but others, including the kind sould patrolling this as moderators, are more forgiving. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com