simona.racioppi at libero.it
2009-Nov-26 11:12 UTC
[R] R: RE: R: Re: R: Re: chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski and Choleski with pivoting of matrix fails
Thanks for your message! Actually it works quite well for me too. If I then take the trace of the final result below, I end up with a number made up of both a real and an imaginary part. This does not probably mean much if the trace of the matrix below givens me info about the degrees of freedom of a model... Simona>----Messaggio originale---- >Da: RVaradhan at jhmi.edu >Data: 25-nov-2009 18.55 >A: <simona.racioppi at libero.it>, <P.Dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> >Cc: <r-help at r-project.org> >Ogg: RE: [R] R: Re: R: Re: chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski andCholeski with pivoting of matrix fails> >I do not understand what the problem is, as it works just fine for me: > >A <- matrix(c(0.5401984,-0.3998675,-1.3785897,-0.3998675,1.0561872, >0.8158639,-1.3785897, 0.8158639, 1.6073119), 3, 3, byrow=TRUE) > >eA <- eigen(A) > >chA <- eA$vec %*% diag(sqrt(eA$val+0i)) %*% t(eA$vec) > >all.equal(A, Re(chA %*% t(chA))) > >Y <- diag(c(1,2,3)) > >solve(chA %*% Y) > >Ravi. >>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Ravi Varadhan, Ph.D. > >Assistant Professor, The Center on Aging and Health > >Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology > >Johns Hopkins University > >Ph: (410) 502-2619 > >Fax: (410) 614-9625 > >Email: rvaradhan at jhmi.edu > >Webpage: http://www.jhsph.edu/agingandhealth/People/Faculty_personal_pages/Varadhan.html> > >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >-----Original Message----- >From: r-help-bounces at r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] OnBehalf Of simona.racioppi at libero.it>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:59 AM >To: P.Dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk >Cc: r-help at r-project.org >Subject: [R] R: Re: R: Re: chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski andCholeski with pivoting of matrix fails> >Dear Peter, >thank you very much for your answer. > >My problem is that I need to calculate the following quantity: > >solve(chol(A)%*%Y) > >Y is a 3*3 diagonal matrix and A is a 3*3 matrix. Unfortunately one >eigenvalue of A is negative. I can anyway take the square root of A but whenI>multiply it by Y, the imaginary part of the square root of A is dropped, andI>do not get the right answer. > >I tried to exploit the diagonal structure of Y by using 2*2 matrices for A >and Y. In this way the problem mentioned above disappears (since all >eigenvalues of A are positive) and when I perform the calculation above Iget>approximately the right answer. The approximation is quite good. However itis>an approximation. > >Any suggestion? >Thank you very much! >Simon > > > > >>----Messaggio originale---- >>Da: P.Dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk >>Data: 23-nov-2009 14.09 >>A: "simona.racioppi at libero.it"<simona.racioppi at libero.it> >>Cc: "Charles C. Berry"<cberry at tajo.ucsd.edu>, <r-help at r-project.org> >>Ogg: Re: R: Re: [R] chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski and Choleski >with pivoting of matrix fails >> >>simona.racioppi at libero.it wrote: >>> It works! But Once I have the square root of this matrix, how do Iconvert>it >>> to a real (not imaginary) matrix which has the same property? Is that >>> possible? >> >>No. That is theoretically impossible. >> >>If A = B'B, then x'Ax = ||Bx||^2 >= 0 >> >>for any x, which implies in particular that all eigenvalues of A should >>be nonnegative. >> >>> >>> Best, >>> Simon >>> >>>> ----Messaggio originale---- >>>> Da: p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk >>>> Data: 21-nov-2009 18.56 >>>> A: "Charles C. Berry"<cberry at tajo.ucsd.edu> >>>> Cc: "simona.racioppi at libero.it"<simona.racioppi at libero.it>, <r-help at r- >>> project.org> >>>> Ogg: Re: [R] chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski and Choleskiwith>>> pivoting of matrix fails >>>> Charles C. Berry wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, simona.racioppi at libero.it wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I need to take the square root of the following matrix: >>>>>> >>>>>> [,1] [,2] [,3] >>>>>> [1,] 0.5401984 -0.3998675 -1.3785897 >>>>>> [2,] -0.3998675 1.0561872 0.8158639 >>>>>> [3,] -1.3785897 0.8158639 1.6073119 >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried Choleski which fails. I then tried Choleski with pivoting,but>>>>>> unfortunately the square root I get is not valid. I also tried eigen >>>>>> decomposition but i did no get far. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any clue on how to do it?! >>>>> >>>>> If you want to take the square root of a negative definite matrix,you>>>>> could use >>>>> >>>>> sqrtm( neg.def.mat ) >>>>> >>>>> from the expm package on rforge: >>>>> >>>>> http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/expm/ >>>> But that matrix is not negative definite! It has 2 positive and one >>>> negative eigenvalue. It is non-positive definite. >>>> >>>> It is fairly easy in any case to get a matrix square root from the >eigen >>>> decomposition: >>>> >>>>> v%*%diag(sqrt(d+0i))%*%t(v) >>>> [,1] [,2] [,3] >>>> [1,] 0.5164499+0.4152591i -0.1247682-0.0562317i -0.7257079+0.3051868i >>>> [2,] -0.1247682-0.0562317i 0.9618445+0.0076145i 0.3469916-0.0413264i >>>> [3,] -0.7257079+0.3051868i 0.3469916-0.0413264i 1.0513849+0.2242912i >>>>> ch <- v%*%diag(sqrt(d+0i))%*%t(v) >>>>> t(ch)%*% ch >>>> [,1] [,2] [,3] >>>> [1,] 0.5401984+0i -0.3998675-0i -1.3785897-0i >>>> [2,] -0.3998675-0i 1.0561872+0i 0.8158639-0i >>>> [3,] -1.3785897-0i 0.8158639-0i 1.6073119-0i >>>> >>>> A triangular square root is, er, more difficult, but hardly impossible. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B >>>> c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K >>>> (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45)35327918>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45)35327907>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>-- >> O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B >> c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K >> (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 >>~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907 >> >> > >______________________________________________ >R-help at r-project.org mailing list >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > >
Seemingly Similar Threads
- R: Re: chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski and Choleski with pivoting of matrix fails
- R: Re: R: Re: chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski and Choleski with pivoting of matrix fails
- Pivoting in chol
- Choleski decomposition
- LLVM 3.8.0 - Adding new instruction to a basic block