search for: simona

Why not just use Instruction::insertAfter()? I->insertAfter(new_inst); On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Try incrementing the iterator before using. > > On Sep 5, 2016 10:26, "Simona Simona via llvm-dev" < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Simona Simona via llvm-dev < >&g...

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Simona Simona via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to add a new instruction after a given instruction in a basic >> block. >> Until LLVM 3.7, I was using the following code: >> >> BB->getInstList()....

...when I perform the calculation above I get approximately the right answer. The approximation is quite good. However it is an approximation. Any suggestion? Thank you very much! Simon >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: P.Dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk >Data: 23-nov-2009 14.09 >A: "simona.racioppi at libero.it"<simona.racioppi at libero.it> >Cc: "Charles C. Berry"<cberry at tajo.ucsd.edu>, <r-help at r-project.org> >Ogg: Re: R: Re: [R] chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski and Choleski with pivoting of matrix fails > >simona.racioppi...

...message! Actually it works quite well for me too. If I then take the trace of the final result below, I end up with a number made up of both a real and an imaginary part. This does not probably mean much if the trace of the matrix below givens me info about the degrees of freedom of a model... Simona >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: RVaradhan at jhmi.edu >Data: 25-nov-2009 18.55 >A: <simona.racioppi at libero.it>, <P.Dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk> >Cc: <r-help at r-project.org> >Ogg: RE: [R] R: Re: R: Re: chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski and Choleski...

...following code: BB->getInstList().insertAfter(I, new_inst); [where both I and new_inst are Instruction*] In LLVM 3.8 however, the SymbolTableList was created as a wrapper over iplist. Could anyone please tell me how I can do the same type of insertion in LLVM 3.8? Thank you and Regards, Simona -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160904/d48406cc/attachment.html>

...ay to split data into date column, V2, V3 and V4 columns and erase those lines without date, so that data would look like that: date V2 V3 V4 2010.12.26 00:01:52 555 11.67 44 2010.12.26 00:02:52 566 11.67 44 etc. Thanks a lot! -- Simonas Kecorius ** [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...atrix, how do I convert it to a real (not imaginary) matrix which has the same property? Is that possible? Best, Simon >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk >Data: 21-nov-2009 18.56 >A: "Charles C. Berry"<cberry at tajo.ucsd.edu> >Cc: "simona.racioppi at libero.it"<simona.racioppi at libero.it>, <r-help at r- project.org> >Ogg: Re: [R] chol( neg.def.matrix ) WAS: Re: Choleski and Choleski with pivoting of matrix fails > >Charles C. Berry wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, simona.racioppi at libero.it wrote:...

...) #Error in loadNamespace(j <- i[[1L]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[j]]) : # there is no package called ‘intervals’ #In addition: Warning message: #package ‘gstat’ was built under R version 3.0.2 #Error: package or namespace load failed for ‘gstat’ what do you recommend? -- Simona Augyte, MS PhD student Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut cell 707-832-7007 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ean from 8 to 14 same as V1 same as V1 etc. I can do it column by column using: y.ts <- ts(y$V1, frequency=12) aggregate(y.ts, FUN=mean) Bu this is a hardcore... Can anyone suggest a better way to compute all the dataframe at once and get a result as matrix? Thank you in advance! -- Simonas Kecorius ** [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...g Samba to re-read the smb.conf and setting up new shares without killing all of the active connections and therefore locks? Your help is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Simon ------------------------------------------------------------- Simon Allenby - IT - Project Telecom plc email - simona@projtel.co.uk Direct line 01636 615200 ------------------------------------------------------------ This communication is confidential and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not that person you are not permitted to make use of the information and you are requ...

...d ................ and so on, until the time when instrument works again: 2013-01-01 03:00:45 44 33 4 ............. 66 2013-01-01 03:00:46 46 35 7 ............. 6 All your suggestions will be appreciated! Simonas Kecorius ** [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...do measurements each day, and I need to process my data: draw some plots, make some analysis. When I have 30 days of measurements each 1 second, there are huge amount of numbers I am dealing with. If you could suggest some automation via R, it would be perfect. Thank you in advance. Cheers. -- Simonas Kecorius **Lithuania [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...speed up the for() loop below. Currently it takes approximately 2 minutes and 30 seconds. Because of the size of Nsim and N, simulating a multivariate normal (instead of simulating Nsim times a vector of N normal distributions) would require too much memory space. Many thanks for your kind help, Simona N=3000 PD=runif(N,0,1) cutoff.=qnorm(PD) rho.=0.1 Nsim=100000 simPD.vec=0*(1:Nsim) systemic = rnorm(Nsim,0,1); for (i in 1:Nsim) { R.vec=sqrt(rho.)*systemic[i]+sqrt(1-rho.)*rnorm(N,0,1) simPD.vec[i]=length(R.vec[R.vec<cutoff.]) } -------------- next part -------------- Visit our website...

Hi R users, I am quite new to R and I don't know how to deal with this (surely) easy issue. I need to replace words in sentences with as many hash marks as the number of characters per each word, as in the following example: Mary plays football #### ##### ######## Any suggestion about the function to be used? Thanks a lot. S. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ng syntax is right? Secondly, I tried to calculate percentiles using OpenOffice and there is disagreement between values. If I do calculation for some number row, than R and OpenOffice numbers coincide, but for a data.frame it seams that something goes wrong. Any thoughts will be appreciated. -- Simonas Kecorius ** [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I need to subset different levels of vector in a dataset to create a new dataframe that contains only these. These observations are not numerical, so I can't use the subset() function (at least this is the response I get from R). Suppose the dataframe looks like this:   ParticipID    ERP   Electrode 1         s1  0.0370       FP1 2         s2 35.0654       FP2 3         s3

...ata=camp.lavoro.meno.na) > anova(g1.1,g1,test="Chisq") Analysis of Deviance Table Resid. Df Resid. Dev Df Deviance P(>|Chi|) 1 1355 578.01 2 1354 576.08 1 1.94 0.16 Why I obtain these differences? Many thanks for any help, Simona

...y mask = 0770 case sensitive = No [documenti_csv] path = /home/csv/documenti valid users = @csv read only = No create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 case sensitive = No From /etc/group staffmovi:x:113:giorgio,boris,alberto,annamaria,simona.celotti,martina,franco,giovanna csv:x:1005:giorgio,franco,simona.celotti Executing 'id giorgio': uid=1000(giorgio) gid=1000(giorgio) gruppi=24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),44(video),46(plugdev),113(staffmovi),1005(csv),1000(giorgio) From samba log: trying access to 'doc...

Hi Simona, these failures are due to the name of the path to LLVM/clang, see below. > /scratch/user/download/release_30/build/Debug/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem > /scratch/user/download/release_30/build/Debug/bin/../lib/clang/3.0/include > /scratch/user/download/release_30/llvm/tools/clang/test...

I downloaded via svn the release_30 and current version code. I am on x86_64 GNU/Linux, I am compiling with gcc 4.4.6 I compiled release_30 with make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 OPTIMIZE_OPTION=-O0 and current release with make In both cases, when I make check-all I get : FAIL: Clang :: Preprocessor/macro_paste_c_block_comment.c (2562 of 9598) ******************** TEST 'Clang ::