Daniel Abbott
2009-Jul-17 10:15 UTC
[R] Package norm has been removed. What to use for Maximum Likelihood Missing Data Imputation?
Hello, I apologize if an answer to my questions is available, or if I submitted this question incorrectly. I have read the mailing lists, as well as the R Project and CRAN homepages. However, I may have missed something. I noticed the package 'norm' has been removed. Its page http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/norm/index.html now reads: "Package ?norm? was removed from the CRAN repository. Formerly available versions can be obtained from the archive." My questions are: 1. Why was norm removed? I used the package and found it to be very useful. Is there a serious error in the package or another problem? 2. If norm should no longer be removed, what is another good package for ML (maximum likelihood) missing data imputation? I have seen several recommendations online, but I wonder which one is currently the "reigning champ." Thank you very much. I appreciate your time!
Uwe Ligges
2009-Jul-17 10:56 UTC
[R] Package norm has been removed. What to use for Maximum Likelihood Missing Data Imputation?
The package is ORPHANED (i.e. no active maintainer) and does not pass the checks for recent versions of R anymore. If you think the package is very useful for you, you may want to become its new active maintainer. Just take the sources from the archive, fix and update the package as you like and submit a version that passes the checks to CRAN. Best, Uwe Ligges Daniel Abbott wrote:> Hello, > > I apologize if an answer to my questions is available, or if I > submitted this question incorrectly. I have read the mailing lists, as > well as the R Project and CRAN homepages. However, I may have missed > something. > > I noticed the package 'norm' has been removed. Its page > http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/norm/index.html now reads: > > "Package ?norm? was removed from the CRAN repository. > > Formerly available versions can be obtained from the archive." > > My questions are: > > 1. Why was norm removed? I used the package and found it to be very > useful. Is there a serious error in the package or another problem? > > 2. If norm should no longer be removed, what is another good package > for ML (maximum likelihood) missing data imputation? I have seen > several recommendations online, but I wonder which one is currently > the "reigning champ." > > Thank you very much. I appreciate your time! > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Daniel Abbott
2009-Jul-17 11:11 UTC
[R] Package norm has been removed. What to use for Maximum Likelihood Missing Data Imputation?
I appreciate the info! I am mostly interested with ML missing data imputation. Is there another R module which has such a function that is well regarded? Thank you.
Achim Zeileis
2009-Jul-17 11:18 UTC
[R] Package norm has been removed. What to use for Maximum Likelihood Missing Data Imputation?
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Daniel Abbott wrote:> Hello, > > I apologize if an answer to my questions is available, or if I > submitted this question incorrectly. I have read the mailing lists, as > well as the R Project and CRAN homepages. However, I may have missed > something. > > I noticed the package 'norm' has been removed. Its page > http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/norm/index.html now reads: > > "Package ?norm? was removed from the CRAN repository. > > Formerly available versions can be obtained from the archive." > > My questions are: > > 1. Why was norm removed? I used the package and found it to be very > useful. Is there a serious error in the package or another problem?What do you consider to be a serious error? Typical reasons for removing a package from the active CRAN repository are that the package does not pass CRAN checks and/or that the package maintainer is irresponsive. (norm, specifically, hadn't been updated since 2002.) This is serious enough to make all automatic CRAN features such as daily package checks and building of binary packages too cumbersome. But if you do not consider this to be serious, you can keep on using "norm", it is still in CRAN's package archives. Or, even better, you could adopt it, fix it, and release a new version to CRAN (although it is not quite clear to me whether the norm's license allows this). (Note that CRAN runs no checks whether the methods implemented are reasonable or well-suited for the problem they are trying to address etc.)> 2. If norm should no longer be removed, what is another good package > for ML (maximum likelihood) missing data imputation? I have seen > several recommendations online, but I wonder which one is currently > the "reigning champ."The "Multivariate" and the "SocialSciences" task views have sections about missing data http://CRAN.R-project.org/view=Multivariate http://CRAN.R-project.org/view=SocialSciences Additionally, I can recall that there is the Amelia II package: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Amelia and potentially others. hth, Z> Thank you very much. I appreciate your time! > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > >