Maithili Shiva
2009-Mar-26 08:40 UTC
[R] (Interpretation) VGAM - FRECHET 3 parameters by maximum likelihood estimation for
Dear R Helpers This is the R code (which I have slightly changed) I got in VGAM package for estimating the parameters of FRECHET. _________________________________________________________________ y = rfrechet(n <- 100, shape=exp(exp(0))) # (A) fit3 = vglm(y ~ 1, frechet3(ilocation=0), trace=TRUE, maxit=155) # (B) coef(fit3, matrix=TRUE) # (C) Coef(fit3) # (D) fitted(fit3)[1:5,] # (E) mean(y) # (F) weights(fit3, type="w")[1:5,] # (G) vcov(fit3) # (H) fit3 at extra$location[1:3] # Estimate of the location parameter # (I) fit3 at extra$LHSanchor # Anchor Point # (J) _________________________________________________________________ When I run these commands using R I get following output corresponding to each command line OUTPUT # (A) [1] 0.7495887 1.1578511 0.8872487 0.7781103 1.1026540 1.8557026 1.1527270 1.1538885 [9] 1.0436005 0.8702552 1.0326653 1.1456378 1.1292287 0.9779141 0.7882611 2.0040318 [17] 0.8832376 1.6684632 0.7112340 1.8440806 0.8103669 0.6171517 0.6632612 0.9288173 [25] 1.2625774 1.2371949 2.3995687 0.9674406 1.2205647 2.2997349 1.3561988 1.0257294 [33] 0.7693035 1.3112102 1.2841138 0.5207330 0.8861406 0.7819666 1.1376008 1.3396068 [41] 0.6828540 0.7358596 0.8678724 1.1191930 0.9581007 0.8645687 1.0269345 0..9853376 [49] 0.7861684 2.2938797 0.5994656 1.3733527 3.0904095 2.7179989 0.8408945 0.9995262 [57] 1.0456575 0.6139744 17.4274447 0.5928158 1.6172649 0.7354806 1.4714551 0.7851852 [65] 1.9091740 1.0862915 1.9082128 1.0051395 1.0991948 1.6698645 2.8901334 0.8174091 [73] 1.3964180 0.7452934 0.8133906 1.2417527 2.1583672 1.1822409 0.8068691 0.8410480 [81] 1.2394454 1.3391757 1.0867579 1.3395385 1.2791401 0.7897431 1.2112373 1.6531473 [89] 1.7432403 6.7756058 0.9385585 1.5561437 0.9590773 0.7936483 2.5215168 1.1984615 [97] 0.6345925 1.4218795 2.3178357 1.5454827 OUTPUT # (B) In vglm.fitter(x = x, y = y, w = w, offset = offset, Xm2 = Xm2, : convergence not obtained in 155 iterations. OUTPUT # (C)> coef(fit3, matrix=TRUE)log(difference) log(scale) loglog(shape) (Intercept) -0.7954072 -0.1283776 -0.03175329 OUTPUT # (D)> Coef(fit3))difference scale shape 0.4513974 0.8795212 2.6346374 (IS IT THAT THESE GIVE THE SCALE AND SHAPE PARAMETER ESTIMATES OF FRECHET.?) OUTPUT # (E)> fitted(fit3)[1:5,][1] 1.339454 1.339454 1.33954 1.339454 1.339454 (WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?) OUTPUT # (F)> mean(y)[1] 1.439024 OUTPUT # (G) weights(fit3, type="w")[1:5,] [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [1,] 24.264915 46.60547 38.864660 -33.624853 40.492033 -29.075460 [2,] 7.599936 14.18608 1.554636 -9.724618 2.440009 -2.670739 [3,] 6.486803 26.53437 1.855081 -12.926846 -5.700736 2.433455 [4,] 16.768849 37.36856 36.299447 -25.025068 34.078418 -22.643518 [5,] 9.562077 15.87083 2.671884 -11.625172 4.418292 -4.454716 (WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?) OUTPUT # (H) vcov(fit3) (Intercept)1 (Intercept)2 (Intercept):3 (Intercept) : 1 0.0022605491 0.0021317673 -1.576056e-04 (Intercept) : 2 0.0021317673 0.0020926942 -1.780387e-04 (Intercept) : 3 -0.0001576056 -0.0001780387 3.892675e-05 Warning message: In summaryvlm(object, corr = FALSE, dispersion = dispersion) : the estimated variance-covariance matrix is usually inaccurate as the working weight matrices are a crude BFGS quasi-Newton approximation OUTPUT # (I) fit3 at extra$location[1:3] # Estimate of the location parameter 1 2 3 0.06930899 0.06930899 0.06930899 (What does this MEAN? IS IT THAT 'D' gives SCALE and SHAPE parameter whereas this gives me LOCATION parameter?) OUTPUT # (J) fit3 at extra$LHSanchor # Anchor point [1] 0.520733 (What does this mean?) My problem is to calculate the estimators of 3 Parameter FRECHET distribution. Which of the above figures give me estimates of the three parameters of the FRECHET distribution. With regards and thanking in advance, Maithili Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo!