R help - Feb 2009 - Putting all independent variables in one variable so performing many similar tests is more convenient

I want to do something like this.

avo(q~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
avo(r~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
avo(s~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)

(There's likely a better way to do this actually, but I think this'll
work.)

How do I define e=a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l such that the following works?

avo(q~e)
avo(r~e)
avo(s~e)

Tom

oops, I mean aov

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Thomas Levine <thomas.levine at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I want to do something like this.
>
> avo(q~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
> avo(r~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
> avo(s~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
>
> (There's likely a better way to do this actually, but I think
this'll work.)
>
> How do I define e=a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l such that the following works?
>
> avo(q~e)
> avo(r~e)
> avo(s~e)
>
> Tom
>

Try this:

e <- as.formula(paste("q", paste(letters[1:12], collapse = " +
"), sep = " ~
"))

aov(e)

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Thomas Levine
<thomas.levine@gmail.com>wrote:
> I want to do something like this.
>
> avo(q~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
> avo(r~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
> avo(s~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
>
> (There's likely a better way to do this actually, but I think
this'll
> work.)
>
> How do I define e=a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l such that the following works?
>
> avo(q~e)
> avo(r~e)
> avo(s~e)
>
> Tom
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>


-- 
Henrique Dallazuanna
Curitiba-Paraná-Brasil
25° 25' 40" S 49° 16' 22" O

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Try:

aov(yield ~., npk)


On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Thomas Levine <thomas.levine at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I want to do something like this.
>
> avo(q~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
> avo(r~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
> avo(s~a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l)
>
> (There's likely a better way to do this actually, but I think
this'll work.)
>
> How do I define e=a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i+j+k+l such that the following works?
>
> avo(q~e)
> avo(r~e)
> avo(s~e)
>
> Tom
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>