R help - Dec 2008 - how to manipulate ... within a function

Is there a way a function ('parent', say) can manipulate the ...
argument,
and then pass the manipulated value into another function ('child', say)
that it calls?

What I'm trying to do is to use some plotting defaults within
'parent' that
are not part of parent's argument list, but to let the use over-ride these
defaults if they choose.  A sketch is below.

parent <- function(stuff, ...) {
  dots <- list(...)
  if (!"type" in names(list)) dots$type='p'
  plot(stuff, unlist(dots))  # or alist()? or what?
}

I know, I can just make "type" be a formal argument of
'parent', and I'm
happy to do that, but I'm still in the learning stages with R, and so
I'm
trying to become more familiar with as much R syntax as I can, even if I end
up doing things differently later on.
-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/how-to-manipulate-...-within-a-function-tp21083637p21083637.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

On 18/12/2008 7:19 PM, Dan Kelley wrote:
> Is there a way a function ('parent', say) can manipulate the ...
argument,
> and then pass the manipulated value into another function ('child',
say)
> that it calls?
> 
> What I'm trying to do is to use some plotting defaults within
'parent' that
> are not part of parent's argument list, but to let the use over-ride
these
> defaults if they choose.  A sketch is below.
> 
> parent <- function(stuff, ...) {
>   dots <- list(...)
>   if (!"type" in names(list)) dots$type='p'
>   plot(stuff, unlist(dots))  # or alist()? or what?
You use the do.call() function to construct the call.  The first arg is 
what to call, the second is a list containing the args to pass.  Since 
you've got both stuff and dots to pass, you concatenate them into one 
big list:

do.call(plot, c(list(stuff), dots))

Duncan Murdoch
> }
> 
> I know, I can just make "type" be a formal argument of
'parent', and I'm
> happy to do that, but I'm still in the learning stages with R, and so
I'm
> trying to become more familiar with as much R syntax as I can, even if I
end
> up doing things differently later on.