R help - Oct 2008 - following up on infinite email server loop

just to add to ted's explanation in case it helps to fix the email 
server problem: below are the two Recipients  and one of the two is 
always contained in the repeated emails that I'm receiving.  Also,  of 
course i don't mean to claim that the names contained in below are 
doing anything to cause the problem .  VEC Operator is just an example. 
There are 3 or 4 others that repeat also. The repeating seems to have 
slowed down but it's still happening off and on ? Thanks.

 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sender: r-help-bounces@r-project.org 
On-Behalf-Of: pburns@pburns.seanet.com 
Subject: Re: [R] VEC Operator in R
Message-Id: <4900C171.1090103@pburns.seanet.com >
Recipient: nalbicelli@tricadiacdpcmanagement.com 
--------------------------------------------------------

ender: r-help-bounces@r-project.org 
On-Behalf-Of: ggrothendieck@gmail.com 
Subject: Re: [R] VEC Operator in R
Message-Id: 
<971536df0810231134l7e1a7871g8791a001f6d7c4b@mail.gmail.com >
Recipient: ngottlieb@marinercapital.com 


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at  2:37 PM, Patrick Burns wrote:

Sender: r-help-bounces@r-project.org 
<mailto:r-help-bounces@r-project.org>   
<mailto:r-help-bounces@r-project.org>
On-Behalf-Of: pburns@pburns.seanet.com <mailto:pburns@pburns.seanet.com> 
  <mailto:pburns@pburns.seanet.com>
Subject: Re: [R] VEC Operator in R
Message-Id: <4900C171.1090103@pburns.seanet.com 
<mailto:4900C171.1090103@pburns.seanet.com>   
<mailto:4900C171.1090103@pburns.seanet.com> >
Recipient: nalbicelli@tricadiacdpcmanagement.com 
<mailto:nalbicelli@tricadiacdpcmanagement.com>   
<mailto:nalbicelli@tricadiacdpcmanagement.com>
--------------------------------------------------------


This information is being sent at the recipient's request or with their 
specific understanding. The recipient acknowledges that by sending this 
information via electronic means, there is no absolute assurance that 
the information will be free from third party access, use, or further 
dissemination. This e-mail contains information that is privileged 
and/or confidential and may be subject to legal restrictions and 
penalties regarding its unauthorized disclosure or other use. You are 
prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using this 
information if you are not the intended recipient. Past performance is 
not necessarily indicative of future results. This is not an offer of or 
the solicitation for any security which will be made only by private 
placement memorandum that may be obtained from the applicable hedge 
fund. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us 
immediately by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and all attachments 
from your system. Thank You.

------------------------------

 From: "Patrick Burns" <pburns@pburns.seanet.com>
To: "megh" <megh700004@yahoo.com>
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Date: Thu Oct 23 13:24:49 CDT 2008
Subject: Re: [R] VEC Operator in R

For 'VEC' you may not need to do anything -- in
a lot of circumstances it will just work.

For 'VECH' you can write a function using the
'lower.tri' function.

But it seems to me that the assumption behind your
question is that a simple function that someone else
has written is going to be better than a simple function
that you write.  Not true (barring bugs).

R is egalitarian -- your functions have the same standing
as "official" functions. A lot of times it is faster to write
a function of your own rather than search out someone
else's even if you know such functions exist.

Patrick Burns
patrick@burns-stat.com <mailto:patrick@burns-stat.com>   
<mailto:patrick@burns-stat.com>
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http://www.burns-stat.com <http://www.burns-stat.com>   
<http://www.burns-stat.com>
(home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")

megh wrote:
> Can anyone please tell whether there is any R function to act as
"VEC"
> and
> "VECH" operator on Matrix? Yes of course, I can write a
> user-defined-function for that or else, I can put dim(mat) <- NULL. 
> However
> I am looking for some R function.
>
> Your help will be highly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org <mailto:R-help@r-project.org>   
<mailto:R-help@r-project.org>  mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help 
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>   
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>
PLEASE do read the posting guide 
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html 
<http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>   
<http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

------------------------------

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org <mailto:R-help@r-project.org>   
<mailto:R-help@r-project.org>  mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help 
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>   
<https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help>
PLEASE do read the posting guide 
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html 
<http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>   
<http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html>
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]