markleeds at verizon.net
2008-Oct-24 07:10 UTC
[R] following up on infinite email server loop
just to add to ted's explanation in case it helps to fix the email server problem: below are the two Recipients and one of the two is always contained in the repeated emails that I'm receiving. Also, of course i don't mean to claim that the names contained in below are doing anything to cause the problem . VEC Operator is just an example. There are 3 or 4 others that repeat also. The repeating seems to have slowed down but it's still happening off and on ? Thanks. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sender: r-help-bounces@r-project.org On-Behalf-Of: pburns@pburns.seanet.com Subject: Re: [R] VEC Operator in R Message-Id: <4900C171.1090103@pburns.seanet.com > Recipient: nalbicelli@tricadiacdpcmanagement.com -------------------------------------------------------- ender: r-help-bounces@r-project.org On-Behalf-Of: ggrothendieck@gmail.com Subject: Re: [R] VEC Operator in R Message-Id: <971536df0810231134l7e1a7871g8791a001f6d7c4b@mail.gmail.com > Recipient: ngottlieb@marinercapital.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Patrick Burns wrote: Sender: r-help-bounces@r-project.org <mailto:r-help-bounces@r-project.org> <mailto:r-help-bounces@r-project.org> On-Behalf-Of: pburns@pburns.seanet.com <mailto:pburns@pburns.seanet.com> <mailto:pburns@pburns.seanet.com> Subject: Re: [R] VEC Operator in R Message-Id: <4900C171.1090103@pburns.seanet.com <mailto:4900C171.1090103@pburns.seanet.com> <mailto:4900C171.1090103@pburns.seanet.com> > Recipient: nalbicelli@tricadiacdpcmanagement.com <mailto:nalbicelli@tricadiacdpcmanagement.com> <mailto:nalbicelli@tricadiacdpcmanagement.com> -------------------------------------------------------- This information is being sent at the recipient's request or with their specific understanding. The recipient acknowledges that by sending this information via electronic means, there is no absolute assurance that the information will be free from third party access, use, or further dissemination. This e-mail contains information that is privileged and/or confidential and may be subject to legal restrictions and penalties regarding its unauthorized disclosure or other use. You are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using this information if you are not the intended recipient. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. This is not an offer of or the solicitation for any security which will be made only by private placement memorandum that may be obtained from the applicable hedge fund. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and all attachments from your system. Thank You. ------------------------------ From: "Patrick Burns" <pburns@pburns.seanet.com> To: "megh" <megh700004@yahoo.com> Cc: r-help@r-project.org Date: Thu Oct 23 13:24:49 CDT 2008 Subject: Re: [R] VEC Operator in R For 'VEC' you may not need to do anything -- in a lot of circumstances it will just work. For 'VECH' you can write a function using the 'lower.tri' function. But it seems to me that the assumption behind your question is that a simple function that someone else has written is going to be better than a simple function that you write. Not true (barring bugs). R is egalitarian -- your functions have the same standing as "official" functions. A lot of times it is faster to write a function of your own rather than search out someone else's even if you know such functions exist. Patrick Burns patrick@burns-stat.com <mailto:patrick@burns-stat.com> <mailto:patrick@burns-stat.com> +44 (0)20 8525 0696 http://www.burns-stat.com <http://www.burns-stat.com> <http://www.burns-stat.com> (home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User") megh wrote:> Can anyone please tell whether there is any R function to act as "VEC" > and > "VECH" operator on Matrix? Yes of course, I can write a > user-defined-function for that or else, I can put dim(mat) <- NULL. > However > I am looking for some R function. > > Your help will be highly appreciated. > > Regards, >______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org <mailto:R-help@r-project.org> <mailto:R-help@r-project.org> mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html <http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html> <http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. ------------------------------ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org <mailto:R-help@r-project.org> <mailto:R-help@r-project.org> mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html <http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html> <http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Reasonably Related Threads
Wisdom of the Ancients
