Shinichi Nakagawa <S.Nakagawa <at> sheffield.ac.uk> writes:
... > I am a little confused which one to trust and use. Or there are no easy
form
> to do this? I am guessing formula would change depending on what
distribution
> you use and what link function as well? I want to calculate icc from GLMM
with
> Poisson with log link function and also binomial with logit function. Could
> anybody help me please?
Yes, you are right that ICC depends on assumed data distribution. While ICC is
very handy in linear models it is not the case in GLMM. I suggest you take a
look at the references bellow. There is also some online material by the same
authors. Additionally, I remember that there were lively discussions about ICC
on "multilevel" list at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/multilevel.html
Best wishes, Gregor
@Article{Goldstein:2002,
author = {Goldstein, H. and Browne, W. and Rabash, J.},
title = {Partitioning variation in multilevel models},
journal = {Understanding Statistics},
year = {2002},
volume = {1},
number = {4},
pages = {223--231},
keywords = {variance ratio, variance partition coefficient,
intra-unit correlation, intra-class correlation, normal
models, discrete models, random coefficient models}
}
@Article{Browne:2005,
author = {Browne, W. J. and Subramanian, S. V. and Jones, K. and
Goldstein, H.},
title = {Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that
exhibit overdispersion},
journal = {J. R. Stat. Soc. A Stat. Soc.},
year = {2005},
volume = {168},
number = {3},
pages = {599--613},
doi = {10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.00365.x},
checked = {[2006-04-16]},
keywords = {heritability, ratios, intra-class correlation,
intra-unit correlation, simulation, linearization, latent
variable approach},
}