Hi,
I need some help understanding the output from PAM. When I look at the output it
doesn't list the cluster number by the median vlaues on each of the
variables (like it does with k-means) Instead I have the following:
So I know for instance cluster 1 has a mean for variable1 of 33.33, however when
I run PAM i get:
variable 1 variable2
29 32 12
97 12 9
308 106 8
217 62 2
Does 29 relate to cluster 1, and 97 to cluster2 etc.
Hope this makes sense,
Nathaniel
___________________________________________________________
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
___________________________________________________________
now.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
You've asked the almost identical question yesterday.
{that *de*creases the probability of getting help in some cases!}
If you take a little effort and follow the posting guide
(keywords "reproducible example"; "not using HTML in
e-mails"),
I (and many others) gladly will help you further.
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
>>>>> "nathaniel" == nathaniel Grey <nathaniel.grey
at yahoo.co.uk>
>>>>> on Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:09:09 +0200 (CEST) writes:
nathaniel> Hi,
nathaniel> I need some help understanding the output from PAM. When I
look at the output it doesn't list the cluster number by the median vlaues
on each of the variables (like it does with k-means) Instead I have the
following:
nathaniel> So I know for instance cluster 1 has a mean for variable1 of
33.33, however when I run PAM i get:
nathaniel> variable 1 variable2
nathaniel> 29 32 12
nathaniel> 97 12 9
nathaniel> 308 106 8
nathaniel> 217 62 2
nathaniel> Does 29 relate to cluster 1, and 97 to cluster2 etc.
nathaniel> Hope this makes sense,
nathaniel> Nathaniel
nathaniel> ___________________________________________________________
nathaniel> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
nathaniel> ______________________________________________
nathaniel> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
nathaniel> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
nathaniel> PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
nathaniel> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible
code.
The question is not reproducable, therefore useless. Perhaps you are forgetting what a medoid is when you expect a mean? HTH, Ranjan On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:09:09 +0200 (CEST) nathaniel Grey <nathaniel.grey at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:> Hi, > > I need some help understanding the output from PAM. When I look at the output it doesn't list the cluster number by the median vlaues on each of the variables (like it does with k-means) Instead I have the following: > > So I know for instance cluster 1 has a mean for variable1 of 33.33, however when I run PAM i get: > variable 1 variable2 > 29 32 12 > 97 12 9 > 308 106 8 > 217 62 2 > > Does 29 relate to cluster 1, and 97 to cluster2 etc. > > Hope this makes sense, > > Nathaniel > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > now. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >