Michael Friendly
2006-Dec-04 20:40 UTC
[R] example() and example(package=) like data() and data(package=) ?
data() and data(package="foo") present screens describing available data sets in all or specified packages, and dd <- data() returns a structure where dd$results contains columns for "Package" "LibPath" "Item" "Title", all of which make it easy to 'do things' with package data. Is there any reason why there should not be parallel uses, example() and example(package="foo") not requiring a topic to be specified? That would be very handy, especially for exploring a new package or developing tools for documenting them, with output. -Michael -- Michael Friendly Email: friendly AT yorku DOT ca Professor, Psychology Dept. York University Voice: 416 736-5115 x66249 Fax: 416 736-5814 4700 Keele Street http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/friendly.html Toronto, ONT M3J 1P3 CANADA