Hi -- I'm using lmer for binomial data. I am trying to replicate estimates provided by Agresti (2002, Categorical data analysis, Wiley) using abortion data in table 10.13 (estimates provided in table 12.3 p. 505). I fit the same model using these three commands: a1 <- lmer(resp ~ sex + option1 + option2 + (1|id), data=abort,family=binomial, method = c("AGQ")) a2 <- lmer(resp ~ sex + option1 + option2 + (1|id), data=abort,family=binomial, method = c("Laplace")) a3 <- lmer(resp ~ sex + option1 + option2 + (1|id), data=abort,family=binomial, method = c("PQL")) All three methods provide the exact same estimates (which should not be the case), and the estimates are incorrect. I know the data are correctly entered because I obtain correct estimates with gllamm in Stata. I am I doing something wrong here in my commands, or is the lmer module not implementing AGQ and Laplace properly with this version?
Markus Bean wrote:> Hi -- > > I'm using lmer for binomial data. I am trying to > replicate estimates provided by Agresti (2002, > Categorical data analysis, Wiley) using abortion data > in table 10.13 (estimates provided in table 12.3 p. > 505). > > I fit the same model using these three commands: > > a1 <- lmer(resp ~ sex + option1 + option2 + (1|id), > data=abort,family=binomial, method = c("AGQ")) > > a2 <- lmer(resp ~ sex + option1 + option2 + (1|id), > data=abort,family=binomial, method = c("Laplace")) > > a3 <- lmer(resp ~ sex + option1 + option2 + (1|id), > data=abort,family=binomial, method = c("PQL")) > > All three methods provide the exact same estimates > (which should not be the case), and the estimates are > incorrect. I know the data are correctly entered > because I obtain correct estimates with gllamm in > Stata. > > I am I doing something wrong here in my commands, or > is the lmer module not implementing AGQ and Laplace > properly with this version?The latter. Actually it is not implementing them at all in this version. I will upload a new release of the lme4 package later this week and insert appropriate messages.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] CommandLine: using cl::Positional with enum
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_BALLOON_CHUNKS
- [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_BALLOON_CHUNKS
- parsing /proc/cmdline
- MVC questions with rails